1UP has pummeled new details out of Namco Bandai and The Mark of Kri devs at BottleRocket concerning the upcoming Splatterhouse remake, which will bloody up the Xbox 360 and PS3 sometime next year. Among the finer points spilled include a return of many of the series' weapons, including the 2-by-4 and meat cleaver, while Rick's arsenal has been expanded to include multiple weapon classes and "a few surprises."
Speaking of the original, while Namco believes the source material's graphics are "best left to nostalgia," the team notes that they have tried to remain faithful to the series' 80s horror movie vibe. Even so, the devs admit that gore is what the game "is going to be all about," promising that players will have "a very messy good time." It's amazing what you can do with that little 'M' on the box. Still, we wonder if the title will come with a disclaimer warning kids that inevitably get hold of Spatterhouse that lumber is absolutely not to be used in this manner.
Reader Comments (51)
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 11:08PM (Unverified) said
Splatterhouse remake sounds better and better each time I see it
Reply
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 11:19PM mr nimblewick said
I sure the final game looks better than that screenshot.
Reply
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 11:20PM (Unverified) said
So basically what I'm feeling from this game is this is our version of Madworld without the ridiculous black & white art style.
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 10:09AM (Unverified) said
You nintendo fanboys are so defensive (for good reason I suppose). I wasn't even bashing anything, just saying that these two games are basically identical gameplay wise. If you can prove me wrong then by all means go for it.
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 10:41AM Boffo the Sock said
"I wasn't even bashing anything, just saying that these two games are basically identical gameplay wise. If you can prove me wrong then by all means go for it."
I'll have a go at it then. Splatterhouse is a remake of a game that was originally released in American arcades in 1989, and Mad World is a completely new IP. Is that good enough? No? Ok then...
All that has been seen of Splatterhouse so far are a handful of screenshots, and a video which shows nothing more than Rick just standing around for a split second. No gameplay has been shown yet, so it would be impossible for anyone to say that the gameplay of Splatterhouse is identical to any title, let alone Mad World.
Reply
I'll have a go at it then. Splatterhouse is a remake of a game that was originally released in American arcades in 1989, and Mad World is a completely new IP. Is that good enough? No? Ok then...
All that has been seen of Splatterhouse so far are a handful of screenshots, and a video which shows nothing more than Rick just standing around for a split second. No gameplay has been shown yet, so it would be impossible for anyone to say that the gameplay of Splatterhouse is identical to any title, let alone Mad World.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 10:45AM (Unverified) said
Both of you failed.
Ridiculous is my opinion. I hate anything black and white, specially "new" stuff as I think it's a lazy way to make something.
"I'll have a go at it then. Splatterhouse is a remake of a game that was originally released in American arcades in 1989, and Mad World is a completely new IP. Is that good enough? No?"
No. It's a nice story, but completely irrelevant to the topic of the discussion. Read the EGM coverstory if you want more details on the game. The two look to be just about the same.
Reply
Ridiculous is my opinion. I hate anything black and white, specially "new" stuff as I think it's a lazy way to make something.
"I'll have a go at it then. Splatterhouse is a remake of a game that was originally released in American arcades in 1989, and Mad World is a completely new IP. Is that good enough? No?"
No. It's a nice story, but completely irrelevant to the topic of the discussion. Read the EGM coverstory if you want more details on the game. The two look to be just about the same.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 10:54AM Comet 20 said
"Ridiculous is my opinion. I hate anything black and white, specially "new" stuff as I think it's a lazy way to make something."
Oh really Tmac? Lets look at your statement without the word ridculous.
"So basically what I'm feeling from this game is this is our version of Madworld without the black & white art style."
Well would you look at that, it doesnt sound like troll bait anymore! If you dont want to be accussed of being a trol dont try to sound like one.
Reply
Oh really Tmac? Lets look at your statement without the word ridculous.
"So basically what I'm feeling from this game is this is our version of Madworld without the black & white art style."
Well would you look at that, it doesnt sound like troll bait anymore! If you dont want to be accussed of being a trol dont try to sound like one.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 10:55AM Boffo the Sock said
You conveniently glossed over the part where I mentioned no Splatterhouse gameplay has been shown yet. Maybe EGM has played both games, but I don't read printed publications since I'm no fan of paying good money for page after page of advertisements.
If EGM has indeed seen/experienced the gameplay from both titles and stated that they're identical, then I would be interested to see empirical evidence of such. Otherwise I'm forced to continue to believe that you're just spinning a yarn to help you troll.
Reply
If EGM has indeed seen/experienced the gameplay from both titles and stated that they're identical, then I would be interested to see empirical evidence of such. Otherwise I'm forced to continue to believe that you're just spinning a yarn to help you troll.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:00AM (Unverified) said
"Maybe EGM has played both games, but I don't read printed publications since I'm no fan of paying good money for page after page of advertisements."
Then you're not in a good position to argue with me about this. They had more info on the game than has probably been released so far, so that's how I know what I know.
And Comet I couldn't care less if you or someone else think that I'm trolling. If someone released a game on ps3/360 with black and white I'd say the same thing. I was just presenting my side though, you can take it in whatever way that makes you feel good.
Reply
Then you're not in a good position to argue with me about this. They had more info on the game than has probably been released so far, so that's how I know what I know.
And Comet I couldn't care less if you or someone else think that I'm trolling. If someone released a game on ps3/360 with black and white I'd say the same thing. I was just presenting my side though, you can take it in whatever way that makes you feel good.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:12AM Boffo the Sock said
"Then you're not in a good position to argue with me about this."
You're the one who's not in good position. You have twice referred to some statement from an article that possibly only exists in your head. Splatterhouse gameplay has not yet been shown. Show me something to prove otherwise because I get the sneaking suspicion that you're full of crap.
Reply
You're the one who's not in good position. You have twice referred to some statement from an article that possibly only exists in your head. Splatterhouse gameplay has not yet been shown. Show me something to prove otherwise because I get the sneaking suspicion that you're full of crap.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:15AM (Unverified) said
http://www.eldojogamer.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/egm-splatterhouse.JPG
Yeah I really dreamed that up.
Reply
Yeah I really dreamed that up.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:19AM Boffo the Sock said
That cover doesn't say anything about gameplay, so I don't know how you got the impression that the gameplay is the same as Mad World from just that. Also, that issue is six months old, and I'm willing to wager the shirt off my back that all they had to go on then was screenshots. To answer your question, yes I do think you are dreaming stuff up.
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:25AM (Unverified) said
Protip: You have to READ the magazine. If you refuse to do so and call me a liar, you're doing nothing but showing your ignorance. Since scans aren't allowed to be linked, you're gonna have to find it on your own.
And no they didn't just show screens. Have you ever read a game magazine before? The cover story is usually a 6-10 page article. It would be kind of pointless to just show 6-10 pages of screenshots.
Reply
And no they didn't just show screens. Have you ever read a game magazine before? The cover story is usually a 6-10 page article. It would be kind of pointless to just show 6-10 pages of screenshots.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:34AM Boffo the Sock said
PROTIP: The burden of proof does not lie on the skeptic. Unless you can prove your claims, I have every right to disbelieve anything you say.
Have you ever read a gaming article? Most previews are based off of things like screenshots and tech demos. Gameplay shown during a preview is usually not indicative of final gameplay. However, at such an early stage of a game's development, little is shown to journalists besides a few pictures and maybe a demonstration or two.
I never said you needed to scan anything either. Surely this article you keep drumming up mentioned the gameplay somewhere in order to give you the impression that it is somehow identical to Mad World. You can paraphrase the part that gives you a gameplay impression if you like.
If you don't like being called a liar, prove yourself right instead of throwing a hissy fit. You asked to be proven wrong, but you can't even manage to provide a shred of evidence to prove yourself right.
Reply
Have you ever read a gaming article? Most previews are based off of things like screenshots and tech demos. Gameplay shown during a preview is usually not indicative of final gameplay. However, at such an early stage of a game's development, little is shown to journalists besides a few pictures and maybe a demonstration or two.
I never said you needed to scan anything either. Surely this article you keep drumming up mentioned the gameplay somewhere in order to give you the impression that it is somehow identical to Mad World. You can paraphrase the part that gives you a gameplay impression if you like.
If you don't like being called a liar, prove yourself right instead of throwing a hissy fit. You asked to be proven wrong, but you can't even manage to provide a shred of evidence to prove yourself right.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:37AM samfish said
This is the article our troll friend is talking about:
http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?pager.offset=1&cId=3167987&p=4
It's actually not completely invalid to compare this to MadWorld, but at the same time, you may as well compare MadWorld to God of War. The only similarities the two games share is that they're violent action games with interactive environments.
MadWorld we KNOW has a huge focus on those environments...the gameplay revolves around them! The EGM preview makes it seem like the environments in Splatterhouse are just sort of there for the fun of it and don't really add anything to the gameplay (which I'm not saying is a bad thing).
You could also go back and play Mark of Kri and God Hand to understand what you're getting, gameplay wise.
The EGM preview makes it seem like Splatterhouse will play similar to the developer's previous games and Platinum has come right out and said that MadWorld will play similar to God Hand (yay!).
Given that, history suggests that though they're both violent beat 'em ups, they're going to be otherwise COMPLETELY different.
At any rate, you look stupid trying to pretend you weren't trolling the Wii again, tmac.
Reply
http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?pager.offset=1&cId=3167987&p=4
It's actually not completely invalid to compare this to MadWorld, but at the same time, you may as well compare MadWorld to God of War. The only similarities the two games share is that they're violent action games with interactive environments.
MadWorld we KNOW has a huge focus on those environments...the gameplay revolves around them! The EGM preview makes it seem like the environments in Splatterhouse are just sort of there for the fun of it and don't really add anything to the gameplay (which I'm not saying is a bad thing).
You could also go back and play Mark of Kri and God Hand to understand what you're getting, gameplay wise.
The EGM preview makes it seem like Splatterhouse will play similar to the developer's previous games and Platinum has come right out and said that MadWorld will play similar to God Hand (yay!).
Given that, history suggests that though they're both violent beat 'em ups, they're going to be otherwise COMPLETELY different.
At any rate, you look stupid trying to pretend you weren't trolling the Wii again, tmac.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:37AM (Unverified) said
I can't prove anything to someone who insists on being ignorant. I gave you what you needed, but you are too lazy/ignorant to check it. It's on you now.
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:44AM Boffo the Sock said
@tmacairjordan
"I can't prove anything..."
Finally a scrap of truth escapes your keyboard!
Reply
"I can't prove anything..."
Finally a scrap of truth escapes your keyboard!
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:47AM (Unverified) said
See you're being so ignorant that I knew you were going to do that. Samfish can argue much much better than you. You should just give up and keep quiet from now on.
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:57AM Boffo the Sock said
You really are as much fun as a barrel of monkeys. Samfish provided the article that you were unable to provide. In doing so, he also proved you wrong. That's probably why you were so reluctant to post the article, because you knew you were full of it. His post proves that you were using hyperbole in order to be sensational. That sounds like something a troll does.
The games are similar, which as stated by Samfish, is to be expected from games that are within the same genre. However they are by no stretch of the imagination "identical" as you claimed. You asked for somebody to disprove your assertion that Splatterhouse is identical to Mad World, and it has been done.
I don't understand why you are gloating in your defeat, but I do find it amusing.
Reply
The games are similar, which as stated by Samfish, is to be expected from games that are within the same genre. However they are by no stretch of the imagination "identical" as you claimed. You asked for somebody to disprove your assertion that Splatterhouse is identical to Mad World, and it has been done.
I don't understand why you are gloating in your defeat, but I do find it amusing.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 12:02PM (Unverified) said
I didn't provide it because I didn't know about it. If I did rest assured I would have posted it, because it would have saved hearing a lot of your ignorance.
They're similar enough to be almost identical. If you play one extremely violent and gory action/brawler game do you really need to play another? Unless one of these games are going to have some stellar story that no one knows about yet or something.
Anyway I'm done responding to you. There's only so much blind ignorance I can take from 1 person.
Reply
They're similar enough to be almost identical. If you play one extremely violent and gory action/brawler game do you really need to play another? Unless one of these games are going to have some stellar story that no one knows about yet or something.
Anyway I'm done responding to you. There's only so much blind ignorance I can take from 1 person.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 12:11PM (Unverified) said
Well, why should I play both Madworld and this then? As I said before, is there some fascinating story I'm missing? Cause I get the feeling neither will have a memorable one.
The art styles? Neither are impressive to me.
So that leaves gameplay. Ultra violent gameplay that will likely get repetitive near the end. What reason is there to play both?
Reply
The art styles? Neither are impressive to me.
So that leaves gameplay. Ultra violent gameplay that will likely get repetitive near the end. What reason is there to play both?
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 12:17PM samfish said
Go play Mark of Kri and then go play God Hand.
If you REALLY can't see the difference in the ACTUAL gameplay mechanics, not just it's presentation, then there is no hope for you.
Dude, I don't know what else to tell you! You're saying the equivalent of, "I've had a hamburger at Wendys, so why should I bother eating the 100% angus all beef burger at this fancy restaurant?"
Reply
If you REALLY can't see the difference in the ACTUAL gameplay mechanics, not just it's presentation, then there is no hope for you.
Dude, I don't know what else to tell you! You're saying the equivalent of, "I've had a hamburger at Wendys, so why should I bother eating the 100% angus all beef burger at this fancy restaurant?"
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 3:05PM (Unverified) said
lol guys, tmac really wasn't trolling...although it is pretty funny how you guys jumped all over him for nothing.
and he defended himself well. he isn't trolling at all really, and that is surprising for some of the things i've read him post in the past.
Give it a rest please.
Reply
and he defended himself well. he isn't trolling at all really, and that is surprising for some of the things i've read him post in the past.
Give it a rest please.
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 11:30PM (Unverified) said
This should come out pretty well since it's being developed by the guys who made the Mark of Kri games on PS2. Those were some underrapreciated gems.
Reply
Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 7:36PM (Unverified) said
@Fenix:
Thanks for the detailed reply, man. I went ahead and Ebay'ed the 60g PS3 healthy amount (sucker sold fast) so I'm heading out to get an Xbox 360 Pro later today.
Now I just have to decide which games to get. This is going to be tough!
Thanks again! (btw, barring any problems, my XBL gamertag should be "turkeybaster" as well)
Reply
Thanks for the detailed reply, man. I went ahead and Ebay'ed the 60g PS3 healthy amount (sucker sold fast) so I'm heading out to get an Xbox 360 Pro later today.
Now I just have to decide which games to get. This is going to be tough!
Thanks again! (btw, barring any problems, my XBL gamertag should be "turkeybaster" as well)
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:47AM (Unverified) said
Sweet man, I look out for you. Great decision!
Reply
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 11:43PM Hyams said
Meh. Personally I find the first in-game battle screenshots of Final Fantasy 13 to be far more interesting than this:
http://i41.tinypic.com/mt5d82.jpg
(Oh, and the red-head has been named. She's called 'Vanilla'.)
Write about that, 'stiq, plz. =)
Reply
http://i41.tinypic.com/mt5d82.jpg
(Oh, and the red-head has been named. She's called 'Vanilla'.)
Write about that, 'stiq, plz. =)
Posted: Dec 17th 2008 11:54PM (Unverified) said
You sure it's not just Cloud after a sex change?
http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/7/73/Nothing_alike_75.jpg
Reply
http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/7/73/Nothing_alike_75.jpg
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 12:02AM (Unverified) said
Good lord I can't keep up with all those awful names. Is that REALLY the best the minds at Squeenix could come up with?
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 12:58AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said
And "Cloud" was such a great, original name?
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 6:28AM kevin949 said
Ya, cloud is better than those names because when cloud was used as a name it was somewhat original and new. Now they're just rehashing. I'm guessing they just opened up a drawer at the office and whatever words popped out at them amidst the flyers and memos is what they went with.
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 9:21AM Career Random said
This game is a blocky mess of muddy textures. and even if that improves, is this premise interesting at all?
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:12AM Boffo the Sock said
"Then you're not in a good position to argue with me about this."
You're the one who's not in good position. You have twice referred to some statement from an article that possibly only exists in your head. Splatterhouse gameplay has not yet been shown. Show me something to prove otherwise because I get the sneaking suspicion that you're full of crap.
Reply
You're the one who's not in good position. You have twice referred to some statement from an article that possibly only exists in your head. Splatterhouse gameplay has not yet been shown. Show me something to prove otherwise because I get the sneaking suspicion that you're full of crap.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:34AM Boffo the Sock said
PROTIP: The burden of proof does not lie on the skeptic. Unless you can prove your claims, I have every right to disbelieve anything you say.
Have you ever read a gaming article? Most previews are based off of things like screenshots and tech demos. Gameplay shown during a preview is usually not indicative of final gameplay. However, at such an early stage of a game's development, little is shown to journalists besides a few pictures and maybe a demonstration or two.
I never said you needed to scan anything either. Surely this article you keep drumming up mentioned the gameplay somewhere in order to give you the impression that it is somehow identical to Mad World. You can paraphrase the part that gives you a gameplay impression if you like.
If you don't like being called a liar, prove yourself right instead of throwing a hissy fit. You asked to be proven wrong, but you can't even manage to provide a shred of evidence to prove yourself right.
Reply
Have you ever read a gaming article? Most previews are based off of things like screenshots and tech demos. Gameplay shown during a preview is usually not indicative of final gameplay. However, at such an early stage of a game's development, little is shown to journalists besides a few pictures and maybe a demonstration or two.
I never said you needed to scan anything either. Surely this article you keep drumming up mentioned the gameplay somewhere in order to give you the impression that it is somehow identical to Mad World. You can paraphrase the part that gives you a gameplay impression if you like.
If you don't like being called a liar, prove yourself right instead of throwing a hissy fit. You asked to be proven wrong, but you can't even manage to provide a shred of evidence to prove yourself right.
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:36AM Boffo the Sock said
Oh come on now! I thought for sure I hit the reply button. I must have refreshed or something. It looks like the only thing giving me a run for my money in this discussion is the comment system.
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2008 12:26PM Boffo the Sock said
"Read the EGM coverstory [sic] if you want more details on the game."
"You have to READ the magazine. If you refuse to do so and call me a liar, you're doing nothing but showing your ignorance."
"They had more info on the game than has probably been released so far, so that's how I know what I know."
"I didn't provide it [the article] because I didn't know about it."
One of these statements doesn't match up with the others.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZIvgQ9ik48
Reply
"You have to READ the magazine. If you refuse to do so and call me a liar, you're doing nothing but showing your ignorance."
"They had more info on the game than has probably been released so far, so that's how I know what I know."
"I didn't provide it [the article] because I didn't know about it."
One of these statements doesn't match up with the others.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZIvgQ9ik48
| 1 | 2 |
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments











