| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (35)

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 7:57PM leobebes said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Are these guys "persons of the year" like Stalin was in 1939 or in 1942 or like Hitler was in 1938?


...you know for killing gaming and all?
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 7:58PM leobebes said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
...btw I keed k?
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:04PM RKN said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You'll be receiving a visit from the NDF soon.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
In B4 Angry Nintendo Mob
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:28PM bmill3 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Or obama is in 2008? (awaits flaming)
Reply

Posted: Dec 23rd 2008 12:55AM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
killed gaming? no. miyamoto gave birth to mainstream gaming. my granny who lives in a third world country knows who mario is.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ah, so Hitler ans Stalin were both responsible for killing gaming in the 1940's? That explains the lack of consoles back then;).
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
bobby kotick was second place

are we sure this isn't "persons who fucked gaming over this year"
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
actually, I believe this is the list of "People who mad a Fuckton of Money Over the Past Fiscal Year"
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 10:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"persons who fucked gaming over this year"

lol @ those who think gaming was 'fucked over' this year

keep thinking that. i'll be playing Fallout 3.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This was meant as a reply to Leobebbes.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:15PM Supermanisdead said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This?

Or that?
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:12PM mrmobius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Hitler didn't kill gaming.

Have you any idea how popular WWII shooters are this generation and last generation?
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:57PM KeenCommander said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Approximately 5 million, though no expert has been able to keep an accurate count.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And rightly so.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:51PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
the only thing miyamoto did this year was Wii music.
WII MUSIC!!
ARGGGHH!!
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 10:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't bother expressing logic to a nintendo fanboy
Reply

Posted: Dec 23rd 2008 3:43AM Foetoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The main problem with the Wii is instead of spanning out big-titles over the life of the console like they did with the GC and N64, they released all their big-budget mainstream titles in the first 2 years. By the time Nintendo take their usual 3 years to make a new zelda/mario etc etc, it'll be late in the Wiis lifecycle or they're gearing up for Zelda HD. All they did with the Wii was push all their titles out early in the Wiis lifecycle, which isn't a bad thing, but it gives the HD-fanboys so much ammo 'omg, no good games from Nintendo in the near future!' *sigh*. Good thing 3rd parties are gearing up (finally).
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 8:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Its funny, I wouldnt have believed this possible 2-3 years back, but EA has probably done far more for gaming innovation and created more fresh titles than Nintendo in this generation. Skate, Spore, destructible environments in Battlefield, much improved gameplay in FIFA (though still prefer Pro Evo myself), Dead Space, Mirror's edge...and they probably did more to reach to "non-traditional" audiences as they put it with the SIms series.

And when will Sega get any credit for so many years of great, innovative games? They sure dont get any sales, tried Valkyria, what a gabulous game, but no one buys it, no awards, nothing.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 9:13PM TwEE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your wrong about the Nintendo/Ea thing.. right about the Sega thing..
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 9:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also, I wouldn't call Skate or Spore or even Mirrors Edge "fresh". Skate is what Tony Hawk should've been doing years ago, Spore is 5 shallow versions of 5 already made games, and while first-person platforming may not be used a lot (Mirrors Edge being an ironic example of why), its certainly not a new idea.

Also, why is it that when EA releases The Sims Will Wright becomes a god for reaching the "non-traditional" gamer, whereas whenever Nintendo does it they're accused of killing gaming and the "casual" gamers the Wii/DS reach get blamed whenever a game doesn't sell?
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 9:40PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the Sims was years ago pal, you're obviously trying to ignore the glaring failures of Spore in the eyes of the gaming community. Besides, what you said never happened, no one cares about the sims
Reply

Posted: Dec 23rd 2008 12:57AM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ moptimus

because playing the sims didn't make you look like a total tard.
Reply

Posted: Dec 23rd 2008 3:47AM Foetoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LOL Slycooper, your an idiot. Very very few Wii games require any more than small wrist movements, and the ones that require more (Wii Sports of example) are so much fun that noone cares if they look like a total tard. Grow up!
Reply

Posted: Dec 23rd 2008 7:28AM Stupidiot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because (at least in my case) playing the Sims was actually fun for us gamers, too. The gimmick from waving your arms around like an idiot in Wii sports and other, non-gamer centric, games from Nintendo wore off fast. To this day, the only game that I had good, solid fun playing on Wii was Zelda TP (yes, I have Mario Galaxy and Metroid Prime 3). The reason we hate Nintendo for reaching out to non-gamers is that, while EA remains largely gamer-centric, Nintendo's focus seems to be drifting elsewhere (Wii Music... Seriously!?)

Okay... Rant over (thank Jebus it wasn't a long one).
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 9:14PM TwEE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who do I have to kill to get a mario paint 2? WHO?
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 9:51PM mrmobius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bowser. He keeps Mario busy.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 10:05PM TwEE said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Bowser huh? That slut!
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 9:15PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How much is a bagiggle?

Can I have one?
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 10:10PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Miyamoto more for creating the best-selling game of the year, Iwata for giving the Wii the single best-selling year for any console ever, and getting the DS to beat the original Game Boy's lifetime sales in half the time
Reply

Posted: Dec 23rd 2008 3:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i remember the pre wii days,when the console was the revolution,and signing the online petitions for hd graphics capacity on it,and the petition to keep the name revolution when 'wii' was introduced.even the sony guys at school who i had to argue with in defense of the gamecube felt sorry for me and didnt tease me about the console being named wii.
its good that they are reaping the fruits of sucess for innovation,but what about all us nintendo defense force spartan mark IV fernando unit hardcore guys? they are sucessful now.great.but i feel like they forgot where they came from.when bioshock was being showed off at e3, G4 interviewed a fan ass to what he thought,and the fan said "its going to be the next metroid prime"
i was oh soo confused to hear that,as the next metroid prime,metroid prime 3 corruption,was nearing its date for launch!!!!! its not like the guy was a noob on gaming,its just that a highly anticipated hardcore title was not being pushed or hyped or anyting by nintendo. what was a couple "wii would like to play" ads going to do against the marketing onslaught of microsoft and halo 3?
suuure complain bout halo 3 was overhyped and "game fuel lmao!!!" but that was microsoft's job and they did it well.if metroid prime 3 recieved only a mere fraction of the marketing that is being done for other titles it would have done even better than it already has.while hardcore titles are being treated cheaply as if they sell themselves nooooooone shall escape from wii music ads.
they are definately persons of the year for gaming.does that gaming include GAMERS? its only by my years of loyal ndf service and the hardcore titles on the wii i would say yes.
Reply

Posted: Dec 23rd 2008 10:18AM Transcedental Protagonist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please, Joystiq, stop using that image, it's over 9000 years old.

It was funny back in the day
Reply

Posted: Dec 23rd 2008 10:23PM wiiluver135 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeah, you've got all that $$ but you still want to sue fanartists?
you Nintendo.
Reply

Posted: Dec 23rd 2008 10:24PM wiiluver135 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
screw you Nintendo.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW