| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (54)

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 9:42AM knighty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha, the I spy conversation made me giggle. But despite that, I have to agree mostly with Yahtzee in that the way the world was designed meant the game was very very samey the entire way through. I've still enjoyed it (haven't quite finished it yet) but it feels a bit like Crackdown in how it's laid out in that you know what you have left to do in the game, and you know exactly what's going to happen every time.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 9:52AM Ross said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know this sounds odd to say, but in a way I'm glad it was very samey, and that falling had little time consequence. My reasoning is that the story was very interesting and these design choices put the narrative more in the foreground, which I appreciated. Beyond that, the leaping around and fighting was fun.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 10:00AM knighty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh I certainly don't disagree with dieing having no consequence. People who say it should clearly haven't played the other games at all. And I think the story, in a sense, suffered from the design of the world because it had to work whichever way you tackled it. I liked the little conversations between the Prince and Elika but they rarely had a flow to them, if you catch what I mean, The only place there was linear story progression was when you returned to the temple for powers. Oh and yes, the leaping around is plenty fun.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:10AM Megadanxzero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For me it was the exact opposite of what I usually like in a game. I loved the story and characters (The Elika conversations were brilliant), which I usually don't care much about, but the 'acrobatics' (If you can really call them that anymore, they feel so slow and dull in comparison) and combat just bored me after a while.

I really can't decide whether I hate it or love it. It's annoying...
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They need to bring in more crazy platforming for the sequel and add some more variety to the fighting.

In this first one, the platforming was basically the same just in different patterns to remember, the fighting was essentially the same, just a different game model for each enemy type.

Other than that, I really enjoyed the game.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 1:50PM juju187 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PoP is great, i rented and brought it (rare occasion)
art is beautiful on a HD tv. got a fluid climing like Assassin Creed. not game of the year but, was definatly worth a look at just for art sake.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 9:57AM NightElve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So in resume for every every Joystiq writer LBP was as a disappointment, while many sites praised this game and even for VGChartz won as Best Platformer, Most Innovative and Game of the Year.

It had it's problems at launch but now there is zero lag while playing online and the new search system works great

Source: http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=2718&a=2
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 10:07AM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Considering it still made it onto their Top 10 List instead of GTAIV (a far better game IMO,) I don't really see what your complaint is.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 9:57AM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This reminds me that I've really got to get around to finishing PoP some time soon. Should have spent more time on that instead of wasting my time on Mirror's Edge's campaign (the Time Trials would have been a different story.)
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 10:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
LBP was def my disappointment of the year.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 10:48AM jhowlett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you don't say
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:14PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For me it was the opposite. I expected to not like it much, and in the end found it to be quite fun to play. The online content blows my mind sometimes.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:33AM gambrinus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, not a single one of these lists had Persona 4 on it. I'm pretty sure that means no one was paying attention.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How well did it sell. I certainly didn't pay it anymind. If it were a ps3 exclusive then I'd care. But since it was on the ps2 I didn't really think it was important.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:52AM Zertoss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think since it's a PS2 exclusive, it got pushed to the side by all of the games that came out on current-gen hardware.

At least, that's why I haven't gotten to it yet. That and I haven't played any of the other Personas. I'm definitely going to give 4 a try though.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 5:03PM Ross said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It also came out at the worst possible time to be included on these list -- a long RPG in December? I'm hoping to get to start on it now. Bad, bad timing.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 10:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that's one of my favourite PA comics
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Glad almost nobody is mentioning Resistance 2.

Average shooter being hyped to oblivion.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't you like Sonic Unleashed?

eh, not trying to bash your tastes or anything. It's just that, whenever a shooter comes out these days, it's automatically 'average' to half of you folks. Most of you don't even play the games you bash.

Resistance 2 is built up on formulas taken from 'average' shooters, but is made in such a way that gives it a polished feel. Resistance 1 may have been an average, boring, grey shooter, but Resistance 2 is lively, colorful, has a pretty nice story with some engaging characters, and quite a few things to find through the storyline (which has an unparalleled scope, might I add... seeing a San Fransisco sky filled with Chimeran ships was, well, fucking awesome). Not to mention, the 8-player co-op, which is a hoot and a half (especially if you're playing with friends - oh, and, it's a separate campaign), and the 60-player multiplayer, which is frantic and fun.

I'm not saying your opinion is null, but did you actually play Resistance 2, or is any PS3/360 shooter automatically 'average' in your mind, as is the case with far too many Joystiqqers?
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You already bash my tastes on the first line.

Anyway I didn't say the game was bad I say average which is not bad at all but I guess in this new era of 9's+ everything short of that is fresh manure.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"You already bash my tastes on the first line."

I was joking, mang.

"Anyway I didn't say the game was bad I say average which is not bad at all but I guess in this new era of 9's+ everything short of that is fresh manure."

I don't like how that's how everyone thinks either. Resistance 2 is pretty far from average, though. It's definitely one of the more feature filled FPSes I've played this year.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well you can't change my opinion sorry I still think the game is average but I think you can live with that ;).
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, you've played it, right? If so, then I'm not trying to argue with ya, because I understand that it's subjective.

If you haven't, though... that's a different story entirely.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 1:07PM Erdie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So...is that a no? Please tell me you've at least played it before writing all that.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 1:25PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're entire initial post was to slam the game - you had an agenda and that was to say the game didn't deserve praise.

Now, I too am curious, have you played it? I played it a lot this weekend and let me say that it is a fun game with some great scenery.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 7:04PM efeez1986 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Wiinterfang

I doubt that you even played Resistance 2 and you probably don't even have a PS3.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 7:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, it's easy.

If you haven't played it, you're a tool.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 8:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes I played it, didn't beat or anything and I find it average, it's it too hard to believe =/.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 8:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
aight.

all I was asking, mang. far too many people out there who dismiss shit without even playing it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 8:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's ok dude it happen a lot with my favorite games too like Tomb Raider,Sonic Unleashed, bullet Witch and all those average games I love so much.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:44AM ScottG13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
More disinterest in LBP and disdain for Nintendo's "online system."

If LBP was not hyped to Hades and back, would it have still been a disappointment or a stealth sleeper?
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 11:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it was released as a "surprising" PSN title for $15-$20, it might've gotten more acclaim ala Braid for xbla.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:08PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The disdain for LBP and for Nintendo WFC both tie to the worship of XBL as some sort of infallible paragon of gaming
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:21PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To clarify that last comment, it isn't an accusation of bias, but the way everyone holds online games to some sort of impossible standard
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 2:04PM ScottG13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Impossible standard? You mean like "functional" like Quake was in 1996? Or just excellent like XBL in 2009?

I don't think its unreasonable to expect servers to function at launch or to be able to have friend lists and play games with them online. MSFT has continued to amaze me in their improvement of their platform. Nintendo has largely ignored theirs.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:13PM mrmobius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why is the Fallout 3 cartoon guy in the disappointment's picture if Fallout 3 isn't mentioned?

Was this a last minute removal from the list?
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:19PM Zertoss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Look a little more closely. All the disappointments are on the left, and Fallout guy is on the right, with a Rok-It Launcher (I assume) pointed at them. See where this is going?
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:20PM mrmobius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ah, fair enough.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 1:30PM Assmar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess. I was hoping someone had the balls enough to admit that they were disappointed with Fallout 3.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 2:11PM Zertoss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't say I was disappointed with Fallout 3, because I honestly wasn't expecting much. At least I liked it more than Oblivion.

I guess these first-person RPGs just aren't my thing.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 2:29PM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I guess these first-person RPGs just aren't my thing."

Hit the left bumper. Problem solved.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 3:10PM Zertoss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You think I own a PC game on the 360? You so crazy!
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 9:24PM knighty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fallout 3 PC + 360 controller.

I'm sure I'm not the only one doing that. However, Fallout/Oblivion are horrific in third person.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:20PM Erdie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
G!
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:40PM Raiden9191 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I recently rented Prince of Persia and I loved the game. I loved everything about it, the story, the characters, the setting. True, it did get a little bit repetitive, but in the end, I really enjoyed the game. The only thing that annoyed me was how many times I died. I liked how the Prince never died, but the amount of times I fell into a bottomless pit just seemed endless. I personally can't wait for the sequel hopefully next year :)
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:48PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, is that a ninja up there?
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 1:05PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed on Prince of Persia. I've seen a lot of complaining about Elika, but based on the amount of times I mis-jump or otherwise cock up some of the platforming obstacles, I'm glad she's there. Also, I've taken a liking to the dual vocal main character approach in platformers. Almost seems dead with just one.

Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 1:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd have to say that PoP was on of the best games I've played in a long time. Something that was familiar yet fresh at the same time. Though I am slightly dissapointed at the ending, it was still an amazing story and should be on more people's radars.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 1:45PM Deck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love Prince of Persia and have to agree with your there. Especially the optional dialogue. But then I am a major sucker for dialogue/story in games if it is even remotely decent. I was hitting the left trigger as much as I could!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW