| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (70)

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:29PM Shmil said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well color me confused. I thought PETA saw having a pet as some form of slavery, well some of the PETA members at least.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:33PM copa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
True, but I'm sure PETA gave Fable 2 credit because its the game that is most likely to let you marry your dog.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's what I thought too.

From what I remember hearing the game advocated the slavery of animals (your dog) the killing of said dog, and the possible reincarnation of the dog so he can be your slave again.

The game also endorses the eating of baby chickens
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:19PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Baby or fetal chickens are a delicacy, one eats them whole bone and all. They say the head is the best part.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:30PM PedoJokerBear said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i wonder how they would feel about my character...the chicken kicker!
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 4:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shmil,

They do see having a pet as the same thing as slavery. I just think their desperate to get people to take them seriously.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 4:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shmil,

They do see having a pet as the same thing as slavery. I just think their desperate to get people to take them seriously.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:30PM IkariWarrior said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What about the chicken kicking???
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:30PM Dirty said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Guess PETA doesn't give a shit about beetles then.

Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:30PM BigPhi84 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait, no Cooking Mama?
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:30PM Huey2k2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'd put money down right now on the fact that nobody in PETA has even played Fable 2.

A game where you get an achievement for kicking chickens is the most animal friendly game of the year?

Not that I care, I love Fable 2 and could care less if it is animal friendly. I just think PETA is absolutely ridiculous.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:34PM Shmil said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Don't forget the achievement for shooting a rabbits.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:35PM otatop said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Don't forget shooting a fluffy bunny.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:35PM otatop said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Dammit too slow.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:38PM Shmil said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, but yours didn't have any careless typos. "a rabbits"? I need coffee
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:45PM teamsammalone said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well, you do become more evil for shooting the rabbit as opposed to funnier for chicken kicking...

as for the PETA and pets thing, I'd never heard they couldn't have them. the only member I ever new had so many stray dogs and cats that her place stunk worse than the pound...
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:24PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The British royal family shoot rabbits all the time, and they're not evil..

*eyes narrow*
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 3:47PM anoffday said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree. I get more confused every time PETA says something else.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 5:28PM Ellianth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How could they play the game when it freezes every 5 minutes? budda-bum-*pish*!
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's official! PETA now supports the kicking of chickens! I'm taking off work early and heading to the Lee's Feed to see what kind of live poultry they have available.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
haven't we been over this? no one cares what PETA thinks.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 3:32PM In A World said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
RAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!

**dumps fake blood on thebig33tuna**
Reply

Posted: Jan 7th 2009 6:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've given up on trying to understand Joystiq's obsession with PETA. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt and assuming it's a purposeful attempt to keep them in the foreground so as to not let anyone forget such an idiotic organization.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:38PM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dangit! I want Dinosaur Racing!

Although, does this mean I'm robbing future generations of cow racing? Am I doing them a favor?
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:38PM Yojimb0 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, I think Molyneux is a vegan... isn't there some achievement in the game for never eating meat?
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 6:43PM thejoemeister said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Featuring a strong pro-vegetarian theme, eating a plant-based diet helps you rack up "purity" points, whereas eating meat makes your character fat and evil."

You're right. PETA just loves that meat = evil.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:39PM Shagittarius said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Gonna have to disagree with Joystiq, Xplay, and Peta. This game is certainly in my top 10 (not top 5) but its core combat mechanics didn't seem improved at all from the previous game. If the actual gameplay isn't great, no matter how polished the presentation was I can't understand why it got GOTY.

I quickly determined the path of least resistance in combat was cast raise dead, then hit everything in the back by rapidly pressing the A button. Instant Win. The fact that you didn't need to understand combat any better than that undermined the whole combat system for me.

I also felt like I was playing a very unpopular MMORPG, the game felt just like an MMORPG with no one else in it but me. Maybe I've played a few too many MMOs, so I didnt have an interest in exploring the world beyond the gameplay required to win the game. All the little things like MArying having children, buying property, etc...meant nothing to me its was almost completely devoid of any meaning to the actual gameplay, none of them were required to complete the game.

I found it a decently enjoyable experience, but as a whole I found it to be a disjointed, confused, can't decide what its trying to be, morality play.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:27PM Erluti said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
*Puts on his troll-feeding gloves*

First of all, you make no argument against PETA's "Most Animal-Friendly Video Game" award, so your post has nothing to do with disagree with PETA's assessment.

"All the little things like Marrying having children, buying property, etc....its was almost completely devoid of any meaning to the actual gameplay"
See, I feel like the people that don't like this game generally share this sentiment. But I feel like that's approaching the game backwards. Marrying, having kids, owning property, etc is the actual gameplay and the questing provides a means to affect your interaction with the townsfolk and adventuring is a means to providing you with money and stuff to decorate your houses and give to your family. I enjoy the game because it is a ROLE-PLAYING game. That term just goes over the head of the general video-game and MMOing crowd. All the gameplay concepts circle about this concept of this character you are pretending to play. The fun is in telling your own story about this dude you control completely. That's why the character has no dialog, that's why you can tatoo and dye your character, that's why clothes aren't "armor"- so you can play the role you imagine.
If you want to hack and slash, or you want to be spoon-fed a story, or you want complex puzzles to solve, you've gone to the wrong place.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:31PM Erluti said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
My last sentence came out wrong, it was meant to say that there are other games that do those things better, not that Fable sucks at them.

I dunno, maybe it did come out that way?
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:38PM Shagittarius said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
You didn't say anything that I didn't say in my post, only you like those things and I think it makes it a confused mess of a game.

By the way the title of the post was "PETA chooses Fable 2 as its GOTY", so I don't think its fair to nit-pick my chosen opening statement.

There are also many games that do the things you said you liked about FABLE way better than fable does.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 3:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Come on, keep it short. I can't be arsed to read an essay in a comments section!
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 4:51PM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Touche', I didn't read the title of the post.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:39PM dabamf said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I thought Okami would win, three years in a row, no? I mean, how can you become more PETA friendly than saying that an animal is actually God?!
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Why does Joystiq report on PETA?

Just because an organization does something game-related doesn't mean you should give them publicity, particularly when you're a completely dishonest group of domestic terrorist hypocrites like PETA.

What next, a list of the best games chosen by Holocaust-deniers?

Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
^^ What he said.

I'm an animal lover, but fuck PETA.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 4:48PM Haggard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
+1, purely because I would love to see the Holocaust Denier Society's top 10 games and their justifications

"Company of Heroes gets top marks in our book, because you can play as Nazis and on the whole they don't seem like awful chaps"
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:42PM phinn said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
PETA? Lol come on everyone knows Metal Gear Solid 4 and LittleBigPlanet are GOTY. This is an "rpg" that, while very good, has a challenge level for an 8 year old and is completely over in about 8 hours. Rental material only.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"has a challenge level for an 8 year old and is completely over in about 8 hours. Rental material only."

I could very well say the same about LittleBigPlanet. Of course I wouldn't dare, that would be sarcasm.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:06PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You went right past the fact that PETA doesn't judge the game based on any merits other than how it treats animals. Oddly, they then choose a game involving killing a dog and rabbits as well as kicking chickens.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:06PM phinn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well yea you definitely could, but LBP is certainly longer than 8 hours and with the extremely powerful editor and tons of user made content most people would play it far longer than that. I was just disapointed when I think of RPGs they should be faaaaar longer and more challenging than this.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:44PM adv2k169 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder what PETA will think of DEADLY CREATURES for Wii.

You play as a spider or scorpion, you need to eat smaller weaker insects to survive.

Animals killing other animals to eat, i wonder if PETA has a problem that fact of nature.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:46PM Professor Lario said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
If we ignore these people will they just GO AWAY.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PETA's crazy.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:53PM ducttapeBigSexy said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Since apparently Joystiq runs articles on the opinions of people who no one really cares to hear, here's your next article: My game of the year is Mirror's Edge.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:00PM Shmil said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shmil chose Far Cry 2 for his GOTY
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 6:15PM arkweld said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why is it your game of the year?

Do you make mirrors or are a member of the Association of Skyscraper Window Washers? Society of Pretentiously Running Around and Jumping Over Stuff? Sorry, I mean ... Parkour.

You have to be a member of some organization loosely affiliated with an element of a game that you probably never played to get a Joystiq opinion entry of your own.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 1:55PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What? Fallout 3 and Dog Meat don't win?
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:54PM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dogmeat wasn't nearly as compelling a sidekick as the Fable 2 dog (mine's named Burrito, btw.) I guess it didn't help that Dogmeat lived up to his name in my game after he jumped in the Potomac and drowned the second time I sent him for ammo...
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 4:08PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What about Far Cry 2? They focused on the beauty of nature and animals more than the destruction of them, no gore or blood involved when they die.
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2009 2:00PM falcomadol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
New Meme: Doritos are flavored like T-Rex skins.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW