| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (63)

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:15PM Esat Dedezade said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Warning: The following comment is serious and contains no humour*

I have nine friends on my Friends list. I used to have 3o but after a huge cull I only kept those people that I regularly interact with. If I haven't spoken to them in more than a few weeks (or can't even remember who they are!) they are gone. I'm not being sarcastic when I ask this; Who has a 100 friends on XBL? If you do, do you feel that you couldn't delete a single one? If yes then you're lucky :)


* Excluding this initial warning which is portrayed as humorous and this sentence explaining it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:17PM butaneko said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
PEOPLE COOLER THAN YOU
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I have about ten but I know all of them irl...
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:19PM Esat Dedezade said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I forgot to mention that I am in no way against the possible friends list expansion (I can't think of anyone who would be either).

On that note, this is officially my last of the day. I seriously, SERIOUSLY need to get some work done.

Goodbye...
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:21PM xFenixKnightx said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Seriously, I have that same question. Who (other than Souldja Boy Tellem of course) needs more than 100 friends on there? I have family, friends AND joystiq friends. Thats it, and thats only like 40 something. It's completely ridonkulous. :P
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:25PM SpacePenguinBot said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm pretty much the same. If there were a way to sort the friends list better I might keep more of the random people who sent me requests. But when I need to get to the people I actually interact with I don't want to sort through the riff raff, so I end up deleting them. This happens even more with the avatar friends list.

I need a better way to sort my friends list before I'll ever hit a 100 friend limit.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:31PM Shmil said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I too have a very thinned out friends list but then again I consider myself a somewhat sane person. I remember hearing about people with like 200 people on their instant messanger friend's list. I'm sure there are people who accept any friend request they get, like a myspace of facebook friend request.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:32PM Nick the Hero of Canton said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I tend to keep a ton of people on my list (I have 67). Usually people I meet in Halo 3 or CoD4. I don't talk with them all the time but every now and then a game of Halo or Call of Duty gets started up and it's fun to play with them.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Then again, what the fuck.

It's free and it takes Microsoft as much effort as editing SetMaxFriends value in their XBL network configs.

So, why not?
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:46PM chdude3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BAM, I'm right with you. I've got about 8 people on my friends list, and I know them all personally (in fact I've known two of the guys for over 20 years now). We're a solid crew, have great fun playing online.

The people with 100 friends are the same douches that have 5000 "friends" on Facebook.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:54PM dantebk said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The only people I've ever heard complain about the 100-friend limit are game journalists who accept a lot of requests from their readers. Nobody has more than 100 people who they're actually friends with. I probably know half-dozen people who play video games, and there's a few more on my friends list who I've played with or met on forums or whatever. Less than 20 total people I think.

That said, like others have noted, I'm in no way AGAINST this. Raise it to 50,000 for all I care.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 5:53PM bromano said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm a member of an adult gaming community (theadultgamer.com) and there are a lot of people on there that play lots of different games. What we have to do now is add or delete people from our list based on what games we're currently playing. It's kind of a pain in the ass. Allowing us to have over 100 people on our lists lets us keep in touch with all of the people we play games with or have ever played games with and will keep us from shuffling people on and off the list.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 5:55PM Obienator said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I have about 10 too, they are my real life friends.
If anyone tea-bags me in a game, I know where they live and I can drive over and smack em.

That's what friends are for. :)

Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 8:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If they increase it they should add a "favorite friends"
Reply

Posted: Jan 10th 2009 1:51AM Keithustus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've met a good number of people who are not all good friends or family, but who I thought were skilled and reasonable people who I would enjoy playing with again. The 100-friend limit has made it difficult to decide who stays and who goes. A larger friend list will make it easier to make sure I almost never have to play with 14-year-old whiny douchebags who cuss a lot and use the n-word every third sentence. And btw, I've only got like 20 people on my facebook friends...I make the distinction there to people I actually know, as opposed to play XBL games with. So thank you MS for increasing the limit.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've been waiting for this for a good amount of time. I wasn't really mad that the limit had been capped, but I did think that it was annoying when you tried to send a semi-internet famous person (ZoopSoul in my case)a friend request, and not be able to officially be on their friend's list.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:17PM llllFlREBlRDllll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, expanding the list of friends doesn't sound bad. I'm not the type who invites everyone to be friends but why not?

I approve of this idea.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:22PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who do you have to blow to get on Joystiqs friend list?
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:42PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Justin this guy is trying to take what you got coming to you.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 4:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Sorry, Sag. I heard he sold you for a pack of smokes.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:23PM butaneko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone who's not in the gaming industry really have a problem with this? The real question is when they are going to create group functionality. Please please please.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:33PM Shmil said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Could you explain your group idea? Because when you say group support all I can think of is the party system.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:37PM butaneko said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Certainly. For example there would be a Joystiq group you could join. Then you could go to your friend's list and under groups you would see Joystiq and everyone who is a member of that group as if they were one of your "friends".

Like Facebook groups.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:46PM Shmil said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Interesting, that's a fantastic idea.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 4:56PM puerrican85 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hell yeah, would defenitely like that. I wanted to be able to sort ppl in groups such as HS buddies, family, co-workers, friends, and etc. Thats a more important update vs the 100 limit. Then again dont mind both either.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 5:56PM bromano said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Grouping friends would be awesome, or letting us "tag" friends.
For example I could tag all of my friends that play Left 4 Dead or Call of Duty. Open the friends list, pick L4D, and BAM I have a list of all of my friends that play that game.
Reply

Posted: Jan 10th 2009 9:04PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh, this already exists. It's called the friends of friends function.

Create a silver account. Make the gamertag something like "Joystiq network". Then, under that account, add the friends of everyone you want in the "group".

Now, anyone on that list can look at their friends list, click on the "joystiq network" gamertag, click "view friends", and see everyone that's on the joystiq network list and whether they're online, what game they're in, etc.

Really, reading through this thread has made me realize that a LOT of people are doing the whole online gaming totally wrong, and I feel sorry for what they're missing out on.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 12:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Vcize, friends of friends lists are nowhere as flexible as real tagging (or other grouping) functionality would be.

And obviously they're bound by the same 100 people limits the friends lists have in general.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If they're going to increase the limit..could XBL please ALLOW US TO CATEGORIZE OUR FRIENDS INTO GROUPS?
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:25PM Shagittarius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah I don't want to mix nationalities on my friends list.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:25PM Saria the Cat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I probably have about 5. Yep.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:46PM butaneko said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
bow chicka wow wow
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:48PM Shagittarius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Hi I'm here to fix the elevator.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:56PM ChooChooCharlie said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Lord. You can imagine where it goes from here."

"He fixes the cable?"
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 4:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
+1 for ChooChooCharlie

"Got any Kahlua?"
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 4:40PM bxgt said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This is why there arent that many girls playing games.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 5:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This is where Saria updates her pic and pulls a Quincy.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 5:46PM Saria the Cat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dave: I've been trying to update my picture for months now with no success, so I am pretty sure Joystiq is Quincy-proof just because its comment/user system is so fandunky.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:26PM xFenixKnightx said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"We, and the thousands of potential friends we turn away daily, can't wait to hear more."

Lulz

You really need to get your own blog, Justin. I'd be on that sucker LMAO all day. :)

Justiq? O_o
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:43PM ArtificeDrake formerly known as said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
an awesome idea


I'd subscribe!
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:30PM OS Perry said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I think dividing your friends list into groups would be great. Give them your own custom names, and perhaps allow 5 basic groups... I'd make for instance an outside the US friends list, Clanmates friends, other outside Clan (friends who are in other clans). A race group... a sports group... that way I could send out bulk messages just to my clan mates... or racing buds... that kind of thing.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:30PM JCarpio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would like a "date added" option on the list.

I guess in general alot of us would like some sort of list management feature.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How about the plea to have the "E 74" error message covered under MSFT's warranty? Don't know what that is? Well you will soon. It's another flashing red light epidemic and MSFT charges $100 to fix it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sure Soulja Boy will be happy to hear about this.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:40PM shafnitz1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They always mention the original Xbox as the reason for the 100 limit. Here's the solution:

Friend groups. You have a "default" friend group. You can create as many friend groups as you want and name them as you choose. But the default group has a 100 person limit and it's the only group that can be seen by original Xbox games.

Problem solved.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What we really need along with this is friend aliasing, and groups. I can't keep my real friends straight vs. their online names on 8 million different formats, Live being one of them.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:44PM ArtificeDrake formerly known as said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't have any friends yet...



*sniff*
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 4:18PM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's because you promote Civility.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 3:54PM ScottG13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Grouping is needed. Also, the list is a bit sluggish in game. That needs to be ironed out.

100 limit is fine for 99% of people. Its really only "industry types" that have a major problem with this. And BIG clan guys. I'm around 40 having NEVER culled.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2009 4:47PM Joeybeast said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does PSN have friend limits?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Time Ducks (iOS)

Posted on Feb 7th 2012 9:00PM

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW