| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (98)

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:04PM acme64 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not too wild about all this 3d stuff. I guess i gotta see to believe.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:05PM Gaucho85 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sounds cool. I don't see how having to wear those glasses will catch on so much but who know. If it was able to impress Joystiq then it must be pretty great.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:15PM Ubiquitous Oxymoron said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
A friend of mibne who works for the BBC is currently in Las Vegas for CES, he saw this demo and said it was spectacular.

also, apparently this technology works on the PS3 too.

0.O

gimme plz.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
have fun taking screenshots for reviews of these games.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:11PM The Kong said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
LMFAO
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You can take screenshots... It's just you'd have to wear the glasses in order to properly see them. :P
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:57PM Novettam said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Aizen

This kind of 3d doesn't work like that.


It is impossible to exemplify it with a still image.

What we see in the posted screenshots is the overlap of the images intended for the left and the right eye due to the camera´s shutter speed. But that doesn't matter as no shutter speed could give a good idea of what is that 3d effect thought a still image. What we see here is probably the best.

When wearing the glasses you have one eye's vision blocked while the system is showing the image for the other one. This ofc happens very fast so you don't notice.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 4:54PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because of the technology where a different image is presented to each eye at different times (shutter speed... display is at 120hz meaning 60hz for each eye at intervals), a screenshot is just going to be a frame which looks normal, but except that it would had been only intended for one of the eyes.

That's just me speculating.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 5:14PM Hedgeson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At least on PC, Stereo 3D screenshots are simply the view of each eye side-by-side. You can watch them by using the cross-eye method or stereo 3d viewing software. Although you need a compatible display.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 10:47PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can view still shots in 3d with this tech as long as the pic is taken in 3d.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 9:12AM Bentzero said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Silly rabbit. You just make your camera dorky by having it also wear the glasses. Duh!
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The fact is was running on a standard PS3 and standard Bravias, suggests it's not that far away, and it also means it's unlikely to cost PS3 owners anything to benefit.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 10:12AM silverwolf761 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Besides the glasses anyway
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:10PM jhowlett said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
sounds cool, and didn't sony just have a special 3D broadcast of a college football game
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:25PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Damn J your good ... The BCS championship game was offered in 3-D at various digital cinemas via direct tv. I think Fox also ran an NFL game in 3-D not that long ago.

The applications for 3-D are endless when it comes to any form of visual media.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:11PM SirFishouse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Oh no, not starocean 4. Whatever will I do?!"

Fighters are where it's at!
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sony never said 4D, urban myth spread by Microsoft astroturfers to suck in the stupid. Congratulations, it seems you are one of the stupid ones.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
My comment was deleted! :x
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:14PM Gaucho85 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Unless I'm not understanding something. . . what does that have to do with this?
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:14PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
The only game that would benefit from 3D is Wipeout, other than that I cant see a real use for this except for stupid bragging rights nobody cares about
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:18PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Also, Rad Racer FTW!
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:21PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Huh?

I think every game on every console would benefit from using 3-D technology. In a perfect world we would have this 3-D technology to go with head tracking technology.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:28PM WiredKnight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm with johnnynumber5, what you said doesn't make any godammed sense.

Also, "blaim" is spelled B-L-A-M-E.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
maybe not now, but it at least gives devs something to consider adding to their games for the future. As long as it's optional, and it's as simple as turning on or off in the game, then i think it's good addition to gaming.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:30PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think any game could be fun with this, but I'd still like to be able to play them normally. I'm not going to want to put on some 3D glasses everytime I game.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe Uncharted 2 can have a 3D mode that you can unlock as a reward, just like the other graphical styles in Uncharted 1.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:21PM kspraydad said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You are just a tiny bit off topic.

Oh..and by the way...too bad Xbox owners: http://tinyurl.com/8eqgv9

See...we all do it.

Enjoy your machine of choice and allow those with a PS3 to enjoy their's...mkay?
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:26PM Shmil said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Isn't time the 4th dimension? Wouldn't that make any 3d game technically 4d, from a nerd point of view?
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:27PM mgarc1125 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really want to know how this is working?
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do I have to wear those stupid 3D glasses you get at a the movies or the 3D glasses you get at IMAX?
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:29PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you're talking about those red/blue glasses, no.
Those have been obsolete for a while.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:31PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They just look like regular glasses. However, they are still glasses.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:32PM Vidikron said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yes, you will. They won't be the red/blue type, but rather the polarized type that look a bit like sunglasses... which I think is the type you get in IMAX.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love the ones you get at IMAX, if they're gonna use any 3D glasses for this they should really use those. The ones you get at the movies break so easily.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:28PM finnith said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It has nothing to do with the topic, he's just a 360 fanboy. Him and Alien Lord are probably the most die-hard of 360 fanboys that post on the site.

Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, what does sony trying something (kinda) innovative have anything to do with MS BUYING an exclusive?

It's not surprising anymore. I'm grown numb over all these exclusives on the 360. If they can spend billions on repair, they can easily spend millions on locking an exclusive like Star Ocean.

Unfortunately, I'll still be buying it. The graphics are impressive, I like the futuristic setting, and the previous jrpg's on the 360 never really grabbed my interest like this game.

But I'll be playing KZ2 way more often. Take that, MS.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:33PM JoshMilewski said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Justin, your approval of this technology has significantly increased my interest in it. :)

But, if it's already being implemented in currently released games, why do we commoners have to wait so long to be able to use it? Is it the glasses? Have they still not figured out a way to efficiently mass produce them?

And regarding the glasses, it'd be nice if there was a better way to implement this "true 3D" than having to wear teh goggles every time I want to get "the effect". =/
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:36PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think there's any other way to get the 3D effect from a 2D display without the glasses. We'll likely have to wait for some sort of holographic projection for that.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:41PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I believe special TV sets are needed to produce the effect currently viewed, and that a different kind of TV set is being developed which can do it without the glasses, but relies on angled ridges being put on the screen
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:45PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Khan

Interesting. Sounds like those would rely on the viewer sitting dead center in front of the display though. If that's the case, the application for home use would be extremely limited.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:51PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ah yes, you're right. There are TVs like that being developed. You can see some here: http://www.engadget.com/tag/3d+display/

But I think the way Justin experienced it is just with regular old TVs (or something close to them), though they're being sent a picture that wouldn't look right without the glasses. Since it can be done on regular old TVs, that's why I was wondering why we don't have it yet. Well actually, Nvidia's releasing something very similar: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=13892

Again, I just wish I didn't have to wear the glasses... I mean, I can't think of another way to easily implement this right now, but then again, that's not my job.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 3:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The hold up is Sony is figuring out how they can charge $50 for $0.50 glasses... ;)
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:35PM Shmil said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
How big are these glasses? I've worn glasses since kindergarden and I've always hated 3d shows that involve wearing 3d goggles. They never fit comfortably over my own glasses. Perhaps some form of focusing on the goggles so maybe i'd be able to take off my glasses and use the goggles and see perfectly.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:36PM Shmil said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nevermind, I was under the impression that these were like those tv goggles that simulate a 50 inch tv in front of you.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:44PM Shmil said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
But the point remains the same, 3d glasses have always sucked for those who already wear glasses, perhaps clip-ons? I'd be fine with cheesy aviator clip-ons that don't match my glasses rather than putting on a second pair.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:51PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you could always try contact lenses or get the lasik eye surgery. Not only for this application but just for general purpose use.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shmil, have you ever thought of getting contact lenses?


BTW, how was the cookie?




Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 3:07PM Shmil said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The cookie was delicious
As far as contact lenses go, I seem to have to world's most sensitive eyes. I've tried a variety of different lenses and they all irritate my eyes to no end. Its like having a gnat stuck in my eye all day. As far as lasik goes I've been told to wait 3 more years until I'm 25 when my degrading vision will most likely level off. Right now I still don't trust lasik, but in 3 years I'm hoping it will safer and cheaper. Still I've been told by my eye doctor (never remember how to spell optomitrist or whatever) that my eyesight will continue to degrade even after lasik, but not to the extent that my eyes are at now.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 3:08PM greatslack said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully Sony (or someone else) will release clip-on 3D glasses, since I'm sure a sizable portion of its gaming audience have ruined their eyes with too much screen time.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2009 2:45PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now here's an advancement in graphics i could get into

too bad it comes with so much baggage (like having to get new TVs, again)
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW