| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (42)

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:43PM baby sea tuna said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I've got to say, this DLC coming so soon after the game released, is bringing out the cynic in me.

It doesn't help that I've heard that the disc-based game ends sort of abruptly and that this should have been on the disc.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:48PM ymmv said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The creative director of the game said that the first DLC was a part of the game they weren't able to finish in time for a November release. If Eidos had any decency they'd postpone the game. That would have been a best of both worlds: game sales wouldn't be crushed by christmas heavy hitters and gamers would have enjoyed the FULL game with extra polish and none of the camera bugs.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:50PM baby sea tuna said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Then if they didn't release a full game, they shouldn't be peeved that it didn't sell as well as they'd anticipated.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"If Eidos had any decency"

I think that was the problem in the first place.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:55PM dantebk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As someone who has played it, I'll say I don't think it ends abruptly. The ending level was fairly epic, and the story wrapped up completely. If they cut any levels that are now becoming DLC they must have been from the middle.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:22PM Snowblind said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's also worth pointing out that the director who pointed out that this content was never intended to be part of the actual game and is made up of almost completely new assests, is actually one of the guys who was recently fired.

So he has no reason to be covering for them. The game definitely needed more work, but it was a reasonable length, and it did finish in a rather dramatic and satisfying way, it's not like half the game is missing or anything.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:26PM baby sea tuna said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ok...but is it worth $80?
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:49PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jeez, the DLC comes out fairly quickly and everyone pisses and moans that it came out too fast and should have been on the disc. The DLC doesn't come out fairly quickly and everyone pisses and moans that they've moved on and they should have released it sooner.

Make up your minds, people.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:44PM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yay for paying $80 for the almost-complete-as-designed game!
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:44PM ymmv said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The folks at Eidos must have been kicking themselves for releasing exclusive DLC for the 360 when they got the sales figures and found out the PS3 version outsold the 360 version.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Lol
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 3:33PM JCarpio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
a link for that tidbit sir?
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 3:51PM ymmv said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/32458/PS3-takes-51-of-all-Tomb-Raider-Anniversary-sales

PS3 takes 51% of all Tomb Raider: Underworld sales

Xbox 360 takes a third of sales on new Eidos title

Fifty-one per cent of all sales of Eidos' Tomb Raider: Anniversary were on PlayStation 3, GFK-ChartTrack has confirmed.

The title entered this week's GFK-ChartTrack/ELSPA All Formats Top 40 at No.9, outselling the launch of last year’s original Tomb Raider remake (Tomb Raider: Anniversary) by 6,700 units. The new Tomb Raider recorded 34 per cent of all sales on Xbox 360, with the remainder on Wii, PC and DS.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:00PM ymmv said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Another interesting fact is that the PS3 version is running at a higher res with better self shadowing fx thant the 360 version. PS3 version is real 720p, 360 576p. See http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1250842&postcount=227

The reason behind the discrepancy is that the PS3 version was ported by a team of Dutch developers instead of Crystal Dynamics.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 6:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. How come the ps3 version looks SO much better? Usually both look the same or 360 slightly better. Furthermore, the ps3 is a PORTED version. Usually ports are a lot worse, if not identical in quality.

Interesting. :)

Hey, gundam!!!! You should check this out!

Of course, when the ps3 version is finally (significantly) superior, gametrailers doesn't bother with a comparison video, aside from mercenaries which was also a slightly superior.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 6:23PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is that really true? 576p is the absolute lowest a game has run this generation, even beating Haze.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
LOL @ $20 for DLC. You'd think they'd space the two downloads out at least a month or something
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:47PM Aziz S said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
As a PS3 gamer, I think this game was "commercially disappointing" because "Uncharted" arrived first this gen & offered more.. alot more.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:50PM Ludwig Kietzmann said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
More shooting? Yes. More puzzles? No.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:52PM PedoJokerBear said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well to be completely fair, ive faced harder puzzles playing with my kids leapfrog toys than i had in underworld.

"that says more about you than the game"

yeah i know :(
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:52PM GamGams said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I loved Uncharted, but the platforming and puzzles are not as much of a focus as they are in the TR series.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:57PM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree, unfortunately I got laid into last year when I said that Uncharted was more of an "Action" game than an "Adventure" game.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:54PM Zertoss said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Unfortunately, the only thing to be released by developer Crystal Dynamics thus far are thirty employees."

I feel a little bad for laughing at this.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:55PM chdude3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd rather if I could get it at retail ON DISC, like you could with Oblivion's Shivering Isles.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 2:59PM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm hoping for a $30 "Platinum" edition with the DLC included somewhere down the road.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 3:01PM chdude3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good call, Mr. Tuna. I think I would hit that.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 3:34PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So this is not for the PC?
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lets ask the magical Microsoft Money Hat.

..."No".
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 3:52PM ScottG13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For some reason, the last TR felt like it played much better. I can't quite put my finger on it without going back, but this one seemed just stale. Uncharted is the far superior title and I would be cash for more Uncharted levels.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:42PM Corvin331 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played Underworld when it came out and just finished Uncharted for the first time last week. I felt TR was a much better experience despite the camera issues. The levels were epic, the puzzles were interesting and they downplayed the gunplay. The ending was satisfying enough. Uncharted was the polar opposite, mostly small areas with trees blocking your path where you just blast away until the last guy falls and proceed to the next room. I think there were maybe 3 puzzles in the whole game. None of which were the slightest bit challenging. That's not a slight on Uncharted because it was a spectacular game. They are just totally different games despite their familiar settings and plots.

As for DLC, it's very cool they are selling them in retail outlets. There's always a chance for a sale or clearance. :)
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think it's unfair to compare Uncharted and Tomb Raider. TombRaider is a bit better than uncharted :)
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 6:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You suck, kobe. :]

If you can't compare, then none is better. Apples and oranges. But one can be more fun than the other depending on the person preferences.

The first sentence I agree with.

Uncharted has cover mechanics, and you can EASILY die staying out in the open. There's no cover mechanic in TR, and you're supposed to do acrobatics to dodge bullets.

Uncharted is more third person shooter, cause it uses aim assist like other FPS/TPS, but doesn't aim FOR you. TR aims for you and locks on to targets so you can focus more on dodging with acrobatic stunts.

Uncharted practically has no puzzles, and for the most part, platforming is very easy, and just meant as eye candy while you watch Drake flex his sexy muscles as he jumps and holds on to ledges. TR puzzles can be pretty challenging (IMO) and you're not assisted at all when you're platforming so timing and direction matters a lot more.

I prefer TR, cause I'm more attracted to Lara and stare at her ass through out the entire game. Unfortunately, I can only play TR a few minutes per gaming session cause I end up feeling exhausted.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 6:33PM apokalipze2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uncharted is more shooter heavy than Tomb Raider. That's why I prefer Tomb Raider more, more exploration and puzzles
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:11PM apokalipze2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game was pretty shitty. I mean the puzzles are pretty good but it's a glitchy mess. The story sucked too and now they have the nerve to charge twenty dollars for dlc, ha.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait...$20?

So, adding up the mess, TMU will run the average player close to $90?

Are you kidding me?

A blowjob should be included from the most recent Lara model at that premium.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 4:32PM Ludwig Kietzmann said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're going to have a heart attack when you add up the cost of Rock Band like that. ;)
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 8:07PM Premature ejaculation man said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or the woman that he demands compensation from
D:
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 6:32PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anyone who releases a game followed by substantial DLC within a couple months will never sell another game to me again. I know my one sale doesn't mean crap, but it's the principle.

Because really, if this style of greed-- er... I mean "business" becomes normal, where does it end?
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 1:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they should charge per minute you play the game like the arcades turned into...
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2009 8:37PM Premature ejaculation man said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1600? I can't even buy 1600 cards. Only 1500 and 3000. I hope this doesn't happen to something I do want >_>
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 1:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ignore it and keep replaying fallout 3

you people just use cheat codes on action games anyway
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Now Playing: February 6-12, 2012

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 5:45PM

Sanctum 2 defends PC, consoles in 2013

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW