| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (68)

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 8:51AM Jack Tretton said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Third prize is you're fired.

Whoops, wrong article.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:48AM oolz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
lol, being 3rd in every market except the smallest one (japan) isn't the road to happines
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:14AM Streeks1984 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Every company is losing money because of the state of the global economy...But when the economy picks up again so will these companies...I am just sorry at the people that are losing their jobs because of poor management on the economic side.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I haven't heard that Microsoft or Nintendo are losing money, though you're right that that may change this year.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 1:43PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
you didnt see that article about Microsoft cutting thousands of jobs? it said the Xbox division was largely unaffected but it does show that the bad economy is hurting everyone.

and Nintendo hasnt really been affected because if you look at it, they are on top of the gaming world right now with the DS man handling the handheld market and the Wii cruising in the console department. they have no problem because their products allegedly print money.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:00AM LaughingTarget said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
A PS3 price drop is defenitely not the way to go at this point, especially with the US Dollar going into the toilet. The PS3 was priced in the US market when the Yen was trading at 120 to the dollar. Now, the Yen is at 89.66 to the dollar. For anyone with any shred of mathematical inclination, that's a huge loss just from currency trade.

I'm not sure what Sony is thinking right now, but cutting prices when we have an incoming President and more than willing Congress that's hell bent on destroying our money supply through "stimulus" packages, cutting prices is the wrong move when dealing with US markets. When the Yen will likely trade at around 60 or even 50 to the dollar by the end of this year, a price drop will only dig Sony deeper into the hole.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:21AM Special Agent Steve said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
But remember, the Yen is still weaker than a US$.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well isnt someone a "God Fearing John McCain Voting American"
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:36AM In A World said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Doug: "Yen is still weaker"

No, the dollar is weaker. Don't let the conversion rate throw you off. Right now, a candy bar that's 89 Yen, you would expect to pay $1 for. However, if that same 89 Yen candy bar is $1.25 or $1.50 (as is becoming the case more and more), that means the dollar is weaker.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:41AM Altairio said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, they should keep charging what they're charging and sit on all that inventory that isn't moving.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 11:00AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Killjebus,
You're as ignorant about politics as anything else, can't say I'm surprised though. Let's see, which President never launched a successful military operation and presented such a weak face to the world that terrorist groups no longer feared American reprisals? Which President started the housing rush that's currently crippling the worldwide economy? Say what you will about Bush, but he inherited a shit ton of problems that just hadn't ripened yet.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 11:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm so confused... Why is LaughingTarget getting down-voted? As somebody who has a degree in Economics I can tell you everything he said is absolutely dead on.

However, I still expect Sony to make PS3 price cuts.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 11:54AM Levi Partridge said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wow WRE, I never thought I'd see a "B b b b but Clinton!" on a Joystiq thread. Good job.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 12:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
What? Nobody wants to contest the point? Just vote me down for blaming everyone, not just the current administration? How much is CNN paying you guys? Can I get in on it?
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 12:24PM Levi Partridge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll contest your point after you confess how much FOX News is paying you!
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 12:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
You forgot that anything a Democrat does is awesome! At least that's what it works out to when people rely on their party to think for them.

"Obama's economic actions are because Clinton had a surplus and Bush started wars!" lol
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 12:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
C'mon Levi, I'm not championing the Bush administration, I just want everybody to be fair and balanced. But if you really want to know...they pay me in oreos.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 12:43PM Levi Partridge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, that's cool. All I get for my efforts is Kool-Aid :)
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 5:46PM zuburi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Let's see, which President never launched a successful military operation and presented such a weak face to the world that terrorist groups no longer feared American reprisals?"

Bush, right?
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2009 12:25AM R Planteer said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
WRE is right.

People hate Bush. A lot.That's because most people are civilians, and about 99% of all the good stuff Bush has been doing is rated Top Secret security clearance or above.

I will tell you this much. Dozens upon dozens of terrorist attacks on the U.S. have been stopped since 9/11. You just never hear about it. You also never hear about how more people have clean water and electricity in Iraq than did before we went in there.

Heres another little shocker for you. Yes, Im just another dumbass on the internet, but take from this what you will.

It is my humble belief, given what I know (and I pray to whatever God there is that Im wrong), that a major U.S. city, like Philly, NY, LA, will be destroyed by a thermonuclear bomb detonated by terrorists within the next 5 years.

Again. WRE is right. Bill Clinton slacked, or made the wrong choice. He did great things for the economy, wonderful things. But his time in office gave our enemies time to regroup and rearm. There was one point when we HAD BIN LADIN. The U.S. military had him! And Clinton said "let him go."

The economy is the least of our problems....

And for the record, I hate both McCain and Obama. On my ballot for President, I did a write in of "Optimus Prime." No joke.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2009 10:54AM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I got voted down pretty much on the premise that there is no such thing as a stimulus package. Polling currently trends that the so-called "stimulus" is a good idea among the average American. They simply don't understand how a money supply works, how an economy works and how Governments don't actually make anything so any attempts to stimulate any sector requires resources to be taken from somewhere else. Because of this, Governments cannot stimulate the economy on the whole via spending practices. The only thing a Government can do to stimulate an economy is to do less and tax less.

We don't get voted up by being right, we get voted up by being popular. What I say is unpopular in times when the public is beginning to panic and looking to elected officials as the saviors. Sad reality is that this will only make things worse, Herbert Hoover and Franklin Delano Roosevelt's policies only proved that (despite common belief, Herbert Hoover started the New Deal program, FDR just took them further). Japan tried it throughout the 1990s and they now call it the lost generation. The Nikkei still hasn't recovered to their 1989 high, which was entirely because of what our current elected officials are going to do. This will be America's lost generation and Sony needs to see the fact that they'll not benefit by trying to price things to our weakening market. It simply won't be to their advantage.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 12:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
in most markets a price drop usually means more sales, its more about trying to find an equilibrium price between the supply that they have and the demand for blu-ray/ps3, so that they can make the sales they need.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:10AM xFenixKnightx said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I remember I used to only buy Sony products. TV's, car stereos, home stereos, surround sounds, etc. For some reason all those changed to Samsung.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:37AM SoulBlade said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's because Samsung makes pimp TVs at a lower price. I love my Sammy TV.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:46AM xFenixKnightx said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
As do I. :)
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:57AM AwesomeTown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There was no beating the original Walkman.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:59AM xFenixKnightx said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
True that!
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I use to buy Sony products too until my third Sony car stereo broke along with the Amp, I couldn't get a decent pair of headphones to last more then a month, and their sales people in the Sony stores started lying customers. In the 90's they made some good AV equipment at decent prices. Now my TV's from Panasonic, camera is a Canon, and I have a NAD receiver with PSB speakers.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:16AM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As do I.

But I also bought my mom a Bravia and it is extremely pimp in its own right.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:28AM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have the same trend going on with buying less Sony as of late. I think their tv's have largely been too expensive over the last few years, so I haven't grabbed one. I really had to shop to find the best price on a Sony receiver in order to justify the purchase too. Oh, and I too love our Samsung tv!

People bust on the PS3 price point, but it seems that Sony has a lot of equipment that is priced higher for the mass market than the direct competition. It seemed to me that they have always had slightly higher prices in order to convey a feel of better quality. Of course, their quality in my experience has been pretty flawless.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:38AM Levi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Samsung is the best quality for LCD's for the price. I must say, though, that Sony's high end TV's do have better picture quality regardless of the fact that they are overpriced
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 12:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
not because im a sony fanboy or anything. but in my opinion i would wait just abit more so i can afford a sony tv,radio etc. samsung werent so good to me when i had them
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 1:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
dude! my 5.1, vcr!, and tv are samsung and totally badass (vcr not so much)
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ouch.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:20AM Starcade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A price drop for the PS3 is inevitable and this would be the year to perform one. I don't think the PS3 division will be affected beyond what they're already doing. For example, they're not really securing exclusives, beyond what they're doing internally. And they've already done bundles, which isn't really working everywhere because of-- well pricing. No, I think a price drop is necessary.

Where Sony IS likely to be affected is on other product lines. Would not be surpised to see a reduction, consolidation, or removal of a lessor performing part of their business. MP3 players comes to mind.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:46AM Levi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I agree with your opinions on price cuts, but not with your views on securing exclusives. They have plenty, just none that have made quite as big of an impact as the Halo trilogy.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 11:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They have exclusives this year, but I don't think any of them are newly secured. Most of the PS3's big exclusives are freebies from a time when developers still thought the PS3 would dominate. Sony Studio exclusives don't count as being "secured" though they are their strongest titles this year.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:42AM Starcade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
By exclusives, I mean third party exclusives. GTA could have, no-- should have been a timed exclusive on the PS3. Instead third parties are signing exclusive arrangements with Microsoft.

Anything first party obviously is exclusive, but I consider that internal, and not something that ever had a chance of appearing on another system.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:25AM falcomadol said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I really want to see follow up on this post when they announce this guy's multi million dollar bonus package.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:25AM falcomadol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Change guy to crook.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Changed.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Stringer isnt a crook.....lol.....

in MOST cases I'd agree that a CEO has been skim something off the top......but up until THIS year he Had pretty much Turned Sony around profit wise as compared to BEFORE he got there......
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:28AM NaeemTHM said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's cool guys! In 10 years the PS3 will start turning MAAAAD profit. Then who will be laughing!? Sony that's who!


err....you know....if their still around.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:32AM NaeemTHM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...you ever post a comment, then wish you hadn't because you're afraid no one will get the fact that you're just joking?

Before you take away all my precious, precious hearts please remember 2 things: The internet is not always serious business and I'm almost up to Ganon and I have no fairies!
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 9:41AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
joke or not.....the PS3 isnt wasnt causing Sonys troubles......its the Yen against the weakened US dollar and the economy.....fail.....proceed to be blasted into oblivion......
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:54AM Levi said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I enjoyed the Zelda reference
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My advice? Don't worry about the silly heart system and just go with it. Even if people didn't get your joke it's not going to ruin your reputation.

I wouldn't be surprised if my own comment went one way or another for comedic effect (I dare you guys!).
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:14AM ProfKOS said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I think part of their loss will be their support of Blu-Ray this year. It's very expensive to push a format, especially a competing one, early. I expect Sony will start to see an upswing this year from that. I don't expect the PS division to really be the main problem here or the cause for their return.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:20AM SoulBlade said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
As much as this sucks for them, holy crap for being profitable for 14 years!

I think you're on the money though - anytime you push a new bleeding edge tech, you pay huge costs for manufacturing and usually sell at a loss. Blu-Ray definitely contributed to that.

More so, they're getting serious competition in the HDTV space - when a common consumer walks into Best Buy and sees all of the TVs next to each other, they'll look pretty much the same and it's all about the price point at the time.

The fact that their PS3 is getting cheaper to manufacture and Home (supposedly) raked in 1mill in a month is probably a good sign that the PS division will stick around.
Reply

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
they pushed Blu-ray the year before as well........and its actually MORE profitable now than it was when first launched since prices for the diodes and other parts of the blu-ray player came down......the SCE prolly came out positive mostly thanks to the PS2......but its moreso the strengthening Yen.....
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW