| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (123)

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:38PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Ok, I own both the PS3 and the 360. Hands down the 360 has the better interface. Heck I have to use the 360's chat feature while I'm using my PS3 because the PS3 is not capable of a chat function that spans across media, gaming etc.

Also the 360 is far easier to navigate. As for advertising I don't have a problem with either. When I go to the movies and see a movie trailer I not only don't mind, I expect it.

When I start seeing Pepsi commercials interrupting my gameplay then we'll have a problem.

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 8:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
But why are you paying for a service that needs to be supported by ads cluttering your interface at the same time?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well that's your opinion and the XMB is easy to navigate,you can not dispute that.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"But why are you paying for a service that needs to be supported by ads cluttering your interface at the same time?"

Very good question.

I don't see how the XMB is any more difficult to navigate than the 360s?

The Xbox 360 menu was fine I guess, but that was only when my console didn't have the red lights and before I stripped it and sold the parts on ebay to all the other poor saps with busted 360s.

I almost like the fact it doesn't appeal to the mainstream, but of course I realize that isn't good for Sony or me for that matter.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Packfan

Ok, seriously this "ads cluttering up the interface" argument seems to only be coming from people who don't actually use the NXE. If you do use it and you're making that argument, let me teach some NXE basics. The only bars you need to use on the on the NXE are "My Xbox" and "Friends" . I know it sounds difficult but if you get trapped on the marketplace, press up or down, or simply "b" to get out.

@DarthNemesis

The XMB is absolutely not the easy to navigate. It is after you have the console for a month. Teaching my stepfather to use the xbox took 5 minutes. Helping him just get hdmi at 1080p on the xmb took an hour over the phone. So yes I can dispute that.

Also lets say my friend wants to chat while I am playing a game. On 360, I can still play my game and chat. On the PS3, not only can I not chat, if I do it kicks me out of my game. To think the console is two years in and something this basic has not been addressed is embarasing.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The Xbox 360 menu was fine I guess, but that was only when my console didn't have the red lights and before I stripped it and sold the parts on ebay to all the other poor saps with busted 360s."

You make it sound like we're living in Fallout 3, down on our luck, selling 360 parts just to feed our families. :P

I wasn't THAT extreme when I got my 3 lights. I simply asked for it to be repaired and got it back in a couple of weeks.

BTW, I wouldn't buy salvaged 360 parts on the internet. :D
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it takes your father 1 hour to switch a damn resolution then man i feel sorry for your father and you being in the same blood line as him. Honestly in terms of online features lives wins hands down but in terms of connections, PSN wins due to the dedicated servers which do NOT need to link to another plays connections to function.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Xbox Live*
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:37PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Andz

Respectfully, I am not paying for ads. I am paying for reliability. It's ironic since I am on my 5th 360. I've only had xbox live crash on me for like an extended period of time last Christmas during that huge influx of users. This free service definitely follows the saying "You get what you pay for". I guess with Live I am paying for decent matchmaking, and a reliable service.

When I played Resistance for the first time I thought it was one big cruel joke. Then I played Socom and learned that Sony has no idea how to properly implement online play. At least MS has a history of online play with gaming zone, and a decent live experience on the first xbox.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I would have to agree with Gorman. I own both a 360 and PS3.

After using both I now understand why I pay for a gold membership. The Live (NXE) service is much more intuitive than the PSN (XMB).

The ability to chat with people while both people are playing different games, videos, etc, is a major plus in my book.

Also the thing that frustrates me with the PS3 is the inability to bring up the XMB Menu while playing a DVD/BluRay.

The majority of the features on the PS3 feel tacked on. Nothing is integrated well or standardized. The above comment I made about no XMB while playing a movie is one. The chat feature from the main menu is painful, why does it take me into a empty gray box just to chat. I don't need to see his icon to know I'm chatting with him.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And "inbefore" Xbox 360 IS salvaged 360 parts. lol
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Lol "Decent Matchmaking"... Gorman, try playing Gears 2 and you'll find "Decent Matchmaking" I don't play it unless friends are on due to the MM.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@ryan

I painted my case cause (I'll be damned) I thought the console would last me more than 6 months of light use...So I couldn't get it replaced :[
A lesson learned I suppose, but if that never happened I wouldn't have fallen in love with my PS3 ;p

Hehe, people gobble those parts up! I got $90 exactly for that new heat-sink Microsoft put in (the one with the extra "arm" attached to it) I was shocked.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ Gorman:
"When I played Resistance for the first time I thought it was one big cruel joke. Then I played Socom and learned that Sony has no idea how to properly implement online play. At least... blah blah"

When I first played Gears 2 I thought it was one big cruel joke, that I PAY for. Then I played Halo 3, and my Xbox rrod I learned that M$ has no idea how to properly create a working system.(Jab at Vista also).
1. I was in R2 beta, it worked great. Game was released, I got in almost as soon as I hit the search button.
2. SOCOM was released prematurely, but now has been fixed and runs great.

The PSN has never been down for a large amount of time. Even if it was, I know I am not paying for it.
PSN does not have ads and annoying things I DO NOT NEED on it.
Most of my friends own 360. I no longer do. PROUD OF IT.

TTFN ta-ta for now.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:47AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Wow. Because I have a different opinion you guys are voting me down?

Your undying love for the PS3 is kinda scary. I mean if it were a woman I'd suggest a restraining order. The way you guys defend it, you'd think I blasphemed your religion or something. Did you guys have too much Kool-Aid?

Just because you're subconsciously unhappy with the PS3 does not mean you should take it out on me.

@Tyler

We're clearly not talking about the same type of matchmaking. I was referring to when xbox live matches you up with players of similar skill. I went from that structured environment to the complete anarchy of Resistence and Socom.

Also I have seen PSN go down on a nearly day to day basis. When playing LBP I would try to play with a friend but more often than not the LBP servers were down. Just because my experience has been different from your apparently orgasmic experience.

"Even if it was, I know I am not paying for it."

Sadly, I would prefer a pay service on Playstation at this point.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 9:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@ Gorman

GTFO you stupid troll. I boot up my PS3 almost daily, and not once since I've owned the console have I noticed the PSN down.

"Undying love for the PS3 is kinda scary" for you? Uh, here's a clue dipshit, it's PS3FANBOY.COM. Get it?

I don't think any Playstation fan here, except the subhuman freaks/trolls such as yourself, is "subconsciously unhappy" with their PS3.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 4:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Trites:
Do you often play DVD/HDDVD's on your 360? Didn't think so, so I don't really get why the PS3 would be any worse in that respect.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 9:58AM Taustin Powers said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Honestly guys, Gorman's posts are a lot more pleasant to read than most of yours. So he prefers the "rivaling" system. Big deal. He presents his arguments in a civil manner of discussion. In return, every post is voted down and met with fantastic responses like "GTFO Stupid Troll"...yeah, true greatness here. Fanboyism at its best. And yes, I am aware I am on PS3FANBOY.com, but it's still obnoxious.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Bassist, if it's obnoxious just leave.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 6:10PM Taustin Powers said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@ Andz:
I don't see how that would solve anything. Even if I leave, the fanboys will still be obnoxious. ;-)
Reply

Posted: Jan 17th 2009 3:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Andz

"If it's obnoxious just leave."

Seriously? The point of having a comments section on a blog is for discussion and debate. Not for obnoxious brats to spout off words of hate.

Did I mention I own a PS3 and use it daily?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 8:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Quality over quantity, and that's fine with me!

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 10:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah it appeals to THE GAMERS... why does this gen have to be about "mainstream casual". The PSN indi games are prob one of the DD games available.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 12:35AM Extinction said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm glad at least one company is making games for actual gamers
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 9:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You said it. I go for quality than quantity! I guess not everyone agrees.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 5:23PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's not fine with Sony, though. They need quantity to make money.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 10:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
maybe so, but this is the reason why I have a PS3. If I was 10 years old, i'd have a wii or xbox 360. Sony got it right with a unit that looks good for any home and lets not forget it plays blu.

xbox 360 is just too anti-consumer. Hey, here's an idea, lets intentionally block users from playing burned dvd's or .avi's.... and while were at it, design a platform that costs next to nothing to make so we can always afford a price cut, even if this costs us a little business with crappy made components (RROD).... because our real business strategy isn't about our customers, but its about attacking sony to its last breath and we will beat their brand image and rule out die hard sony fans and finally.....finally.....finally pave a clear path for the real next generation...

.....bastards

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The only next generation Microsoft wants is a generation that they own 100%. They want to be Nintendo circa 1985, where they call all the shots, get all the licensing fees, and there is no one else to turn to.

Ultimately they want to permeate every single facet of your life. You use their products at work. Then you drive home in a Microsoft Sync-powered car. You make a phone call on a Windows Mobile smartphone. You sit down to check your email at home on a Windows 7 laptop, then plop down in front of your 360. Later you go to the gym and fire up your Zune while you're working out. And right before you hit the sack, one last glance at your email on an XP-powered netbook next to your bed.

It's one thing at a time, but it's all Microsoft's plan.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 4:30PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
^ Exactly. They want to own everything.

Now, that would be fine if it actually ran well, but it doesn't.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:04PM Erdie said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Different strokes for different folks. The sleekness and uniqueness is what drew me in.

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 12:23AM glitched said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
everything listed above is what I like about my PS3.

I look at the top selling games list for 2008 and i get a little sick to the stomach
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:08PM jhowlett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i like it, but sometimes i want the xmb to have rumble support

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:37PM Solid Jackal said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
how can the XMB have rumble?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 10:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
basically when you move it rumbles a bit...like on the Wii when you move the pointer over anything clickable in the menu it rumbles a little bit.....

I mean its a good feature I suppose.....but I wish you could turn it off on the Wii.....I cant stand it after a while....
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 10:26PM jhowlett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that's it exactly. i hear the things clicking and sometimes i think there should be a feeling there also. i just want it as an option
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 10:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds nit picky, but now that I think about it, that would be nice.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 11:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think its called haptic feedback.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 11:14PM McWilly said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are you serious? I find that extremely annoying when the pad rumbles just because you've moved the cursor over an icon. I have to turn rumble off or else it does my head in (I'm talking about the wii by the way).
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 5:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now that would be a touch!, and have different frequency of rumble for different folders, or just have the controller rumble for no specific reason, or rumble when a download is complete,or if you have notifications turned off while watching a movie it could rumble when a message is received(not when a mate comes on line!)
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 11:38AM The BZA said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
hold up.. you guys say the wii has a "rumble" feature for their "main menu"?.. ha.. no wonder so many "casual" gamers have it.. im betting most of them are female..if you get my drift.. a wiimote that vibrates at the click of a button.. most expensive vibrator?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:12PM The1stMJC said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow I agree with someone from Variety, What is the world coming too

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
because, oddly enough he didn't bash it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:12PM Sly C said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
wow that actually makes sense in a weird way. and as far as i'm concerned, ALL ps3 games need video capture + youtube uploading and a chat system like 360. that would be the greatest update ever.

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:58PM Mattchewie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree with you, however change out the youtube stuff with better UI mechanics as the discussed in a recent ps forum thread (example: I get a text message from a friend, If i hit the ps button almost immediately after, it will bring up the message instead of having to navigate to the message section and do all that hoopla
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 10:37PM Indefinite Implosion said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hasn't sony already implemented video recording and uploading?
but it's at the discretion of the developer...
just like trophies were...
and now trophies are compulsory...
could the same not happen for this type of thing?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 10:43PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeah but i mean if they made it so that you could use the feature with any game. kinda like a separate app instead of a tool built into the game.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:14PM Kagiroi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I own both and I have to say that both have their merits. While I will admit that I currently own more 360 games (9 vs. 3) - I like both for their own sets of unique games.

Though it is a problem when a game I want is released for both systems....

Still haven't even come close to deciding which system I want RE5 on.. XD

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess it comes down to the controller and what system most of your friends have(for online co-op).
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2009 9:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Get it on the console you feel more comfortable with. Personally, im getting on 360. I keep my PS3 for its exclusives and Oblivion and DMC4 since they are the superior versions.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 12:15AM Levi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
currently bugging my friend to get it on PS3 since he owns both systems and I only own a PS3. I also have another friend that will no doubt get it on PS3, as he doesn't even hook his 360 up anymore, ever since he bought the PS3.

With the apparently pretty good online coop, I want to be able to fire it up with a friend now and then, and since console games aren't cross platform like FFXI, he needs to get it on the PS3 for my sake. :)
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW