| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (30)

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I try to point this out whenever a story about this adapter comes up: it is unnecessary!

You can buy a wireless router for well under $50 and install DD-WRT, or Tomato, or another custom firmware on it. It's easy, and there is plenty of how-to advice online. Then, you set that bad boy up as a wireless bridge, connect your 360 ethernet to it, and bam. Wireless internet on the 360, for less than 50 bucks.

I've been using this method for many months now and have yet to run into anything more than typical XBL lag.

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:45PM xenocidic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
heck, some routers come with wireless bridge functionality out-of-the-box. but they are a bit bulkier than the adapter.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 2:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bought the 360 wireless adapter for $30. beats the crap out of setting up your *config.
Thanks for the tip anyway. I am sure some people might do it.

*I must admit that the tomato config is great. I have that on my router.

Reply

Posted: Jan 17th 2009 1:39PM KaneRobot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually just helped a friend install dd-wrt on a router this week. Works very well. Had a few issues during the actual setup of the router (flashing the firmware was easy, though) but it turned out ok. For anyone having trouble, this tutorial (for after it's flashed) is much better than the instructions linked to on the compatibility page:

http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Wireless_Bridge#Example


Reply

Posted: Jan 17th 2009 1:55PM Cash9007 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sure dd-wrt is great and all, but if their website could be more damned confusing, I don't know how. I spent an hour looking for the correct firmware for my WRT310n before giving up. There were 9 different files, which is insane because there's only one version of this stupid thing out right now, and I didn't want to risk loading the wrong one and bricking it. I looked on the forums for some help, but only found folks more confused then me.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Too bad I didn't find an offer like this when I bought mine.

I've had no problems with the wifi adapter and it works a treat.

But it's way too overpriced usually.

Posted: Jan 17th 2009 5:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Its overpriced because its truly next gernation Wi-Fi support a,b,g

Wii/PS3 only support b.

the bad thing is you dont even use it or rarly use a,g. :S

my friend bought his wirless for 70$ there was mistake and the they didnt realize that for over a week.

Reply

Posted: Jan 17th 2009 6:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
actually the PS3 supports both 802.11b or 802.11g Wi-Fi standards

http://playstation.about.com/od/ps3/a/PS3SpecsDetails_3.htm

Because it is a next gen..Entertainment System

Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:33PM Joeybeast said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think I'll just deal with my ethernet cable running across my room.

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:38PM muzzymate said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Insert obligatory still to high quote here.

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally, I think it should go down to at least $49 although I do think this particular adapter is the best you can get for a console in my opinion. I've tested several, and the Microsoft adapter for xbox is the best by far.

A funny story... I personally hated my laptop's built-in wifi so I always purchased a separate wifi card for it. With the card it always had better reception and less if no disconnects. So it would be the same with anything else. I decided to try out my beloved PS3's built-in wifi and only got 68% in the same spot my 360 got 100%. WTF?!!! I decided to just connect my ps3 to my LCD closer to my router for better reception but then I couldn't get a picture. That's when I found out how horrible the PS3 is when switching from tv to tv(no automatic res change?), but that's another story for another blog.

Once again proving that adapters are superior to built-in wifi. Plus the xbox adapter fits flush in the back of the console out of the way, even for HD-DVD drive(if you have one) fitting neatly behind the drive connecting the console through the drive to get online.

It was never an issue for me to get the adapter. I needed it when I moved so I got it no matter how much it costed(worth every penny), end of story.

The xbox adapter can also spot a connection from far away as well, say...from a neighbor. ;)

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:51PM MC Double Def DP said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I didn't understand the funny story :(
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 8:58PM superklye said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dude, same thing for me and my 360/PS3 wireless comparisons.

I have the 360 and PS3 right next to each other and the 360 gets anywhere from 80-95% signal whereas the PS3 is LUCKY to get 15-38% signal.

IN THE SAME SPOT.

It's an absolute joke. And any time I mention this, people say:

A) I'm being a troll.
B) I don't know how to setup/use wireless.
C) I'm making it up.

uhh...

A) How is stating a fact trolling?
B) My technical experience/know-how aside (it's quite high, thank you very much), this is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. I choose which wireless network in range to connect to and...that's it.
C) What the hell would I gain from lying?

The fact of the matter is that the built-in wireless for the PS3 is crap unless you're in line-of-sight with the router.

360's adapter is expensive as hell...ridiculously, so, BUT IT WORKS...and hella well at that.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:49PM d889 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
meh or you could just drop your purse and run an ethernet cable so you get actual reliability.

but if you still live with your parents and they wont let you run cables .... sucks to be you.

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or if you don't want your living space to look like a total zoo.

Think before you speak dumbass.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 2:30PM cloud858rk said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
One cable = zoo?

I think not.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 1:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i bought this at launch - £60 in the UK (around $120 at the time).

works perfectly, i get a good connection, fast download speeds...
pretty much the same as using an ethernet cable, just better if you cant/dont want to run a cable to your router.

great accessory IMO, has come in handy over the years :)

btw: GAME regularly have this on offer for £45 when bought with anything else instore :)

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 2:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Its suggested price in the US has been $99 since launch. Utterly ridiculous.

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 2:44PM Phawx said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think a fair price would be $30

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 3:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So this is a USB 102.11a wireless adapter. These tend to go for about $65-$70. So yea the $99 price tag is a bit high but I don't think it is higher than what most people think it is. You are paying some extra because it is 802.11a because it is not widely used and then you pay the console accessory tax to bring it up to $99. BTW the reason they used 802.11a was because it is more stable when it came to sending HD video because it uses the 5 GHz band as opposed to the 2.4 GHz band. This makes it a more reliable connection because there is less interference from other items that use the 2.4 GHz band in your home (microwave, other wireless devices, wireless phones, etc.) Of course you have to have an 802.11a wireless router to take advantage of it.

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 5:24PM prence said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll just deal with the mostly-hidden cable running across my room that is daisy-chaining my 360 and my PC (with a wifi card.) I debated on purchasing one of these a while back just to eliminate ANY possible bit of lag but decided against it when I heard that they don't have great range. My PC wifi card has a ridiculous after-market antenna that only cost me 45 bucks so I figure it probably beats out this adapter.

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 5:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sad thing is that this overprice POS still doesn't support WPA2 (as near as I can tell).

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 5:53PM Laser Sanchez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd love a wifi adapter, but I wouldn't want my entertainment system looking all "cluttery" ;-)

Posted: Jan 16th 2009 6:56PM dogmaticatheist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ethernet cables aren't clutter?

M$ needs to price this thing at $49.00. It's basically half the price of the console which is insanity.
Reply

Posted: Jan 17th 2009 12:26AM Laser Sanchez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's a joke about the Sony price thing they just put out a while ago stating that add-on devices add to clutter around the entertainment system. Not sure how this little wi-fi adapter could be considered clutter, but whatev.
Reply

Posted: Jan 17th 2009 12:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
still alot to pay for just for a couple of lines of compatibility code.

Posted: Jan 17th 2009 1:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
because of this *** prices, I use an ethernet cable since last week, needed to go through 1 wall and behind some standing CD-shelves, but now, everything is fine ... lost 1 hour, saved 69+ bucks. :-)

Posted: Jan 17th 2009 1:03PM gypsygib said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's still a rip off, it should cost no more than 50 bucks.

Posted: Jan 18th 2009 7:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i just checked and the price hasnt changed, anyone have any info?

Posted: Jan 18th 2009 8:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kicks off late Sunday/early Monday (3am EST)...


Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW