CoD: World at War unlocks Nazi zombies for all, gives double XP this weekend

I agree Dave, plus COD:WaW actually has a good single player unlike Left4Dead and the game doesn't get repetitive like Left4Dead. Now let's put our flame suits on and watch all the fanboys shun us t0 hell. lol

RABLE RABLE RABLE!!!!

Sorry I can't flame you since I've never played World at War (I know I feel bad for me too), but I had to make you feel like you got a little flame. LOL

i can't wait for a game to feature zombie dinosaurs ridden by nazis

With all due respect and sugar on top. WOW is a lukewarm COD4 rip, L4D owns....especially your moms.

Oh snapz!

Hmm haven't played COD:WAW but i must agree that left 4 dead is pretty overated. I do like the game and own it, got it in the valve pack when it was on sale. But there's only so much time you can spent unloading clips into zombies before it looses its fun. I haven't really tried out the multiplayer yet though as i haven't had time.

@Obie

How could you even compare World Of Warcraft to Call of Duty? I don't see your logic....

If L4D wasn't a Valve game, you'd all think it was awesome.

It just seems overrated in comparison to how good their other recent stuff is.

Goddamn iphone autocomplete...meh I am voting myself down for that stuff.

j.howlett as any Ninja (Or Nonja) might tell before he kills you Zombie Dinosaurs are more likely to eat the Nazi.

Now that Surfing Nazis on Giant Radioactive Sea Turtles you have to pay attention to those.Thank you Canada Army and O.N.U Soldiers for keeping our bays safe.

The problem I had with L4D is that it breaks an important rule of every Valve game:

Have always an amazing level design.

In L4D Dead Toll and Blood Harvest are pretty much the same and in a game with only 4 Campaigns you would think they would have been more creative. I mean Dead Air was awesome and is my favorite Campaign, No mercy was a good intro level for rookies, Dead Toll stand off was quite original but Blood harvest feels like an extend of Dead Toll but without the cool final Standoff.

The other thing that annoyed me was the fact you couldn’t play as a Zombie in single player unless it was in the split screen middle also the fact thy didn’t released maps especially designed for Versus mode.

Still is a good game if you can stand playing online all the time and is one of those games is great but just in PC. If you are stuck with the Xbox version you might as well forget it, matchmaking again is as good as shooting yourself in the foot but Valve still shows some mercy and intelligence by letting you join at any time but most of the time in versus the match was already decided or you arrive too late but still it makes the game better and it saves the normal online mode, if it wasn’t for that L4D would be unplayable.

(Did you hear that all you people making games for the Xbox live? joining at any time is possible you lazy devs)

Not to mention that only a few people in xlive knows what Co-operation means, I swear I was in a match where some d*che with a MLG gamertag shoot me for about 5 minutes before realizing there was no Friendly Fire.

@Haggard
That's actually what I disliked about L4D. It's too... Valve-ey. It has that too fast/floating gun/no recoil feel to it. W@W has more weight to it. Maybe L4D is supposed to be really arcadey and it just didn't click with me, but the feeling was the same as I got from HL2, so I think it's just a Valve thing.

If Modern Warfare 2 has a zombie mode, that will be about perfect for me.

Yup World at War is totally a better game, with it's zero recognition from the gaming press at the end of the year awards. A real innovator that one.

L4D must be pretty shit if the list of it's pros consists entirely of "COD:W@W didn't get a pile of awards." It's like you completely forgot "There's an F in the title." and "Was released on a day ending in Y." If you want to say it's good, you can do a hell of a lot better than that.

And to clarify, I'm not saying that it's bad, I just didn't particularly enjoy it.

@Trev, ah I see your icon is a Troll.
Well I guess I will stop feeding you then.

I will just say if COD:WOW did not have COD in the title, no one would have played it...even franchize sheep.

I dunno if nazi zombies> L4D, but i will say Nazi Zombies> the rest of COD5 single player.
I dragged my ass through the single player just so i could get to the sweet pot of gold at the end of the rainbow... if i had only been more patient.

Just for the whole "floating gun" argument at L4D, I don't understand. You can look down and see your whole body in L4D, in W@W you cannot.

THERE IS A REASON COD:WAW SOLD MILLIONS MORE COPIES THAN L4D...
its just a better game.

obie-
your last comment makes no sense because if Left 4 Dead did not the name valve on it, nobody probably would have played it either...
oh yeah not that many people bought the game anyway...

@obie
1. It's a Skrull
2. I see you're taking this personally and you still can't come up with anything good about L4D. Tell Gabe I say hi.

@Ihavepants
It's just the way it moves around. I don't like games that over do it like Jericho did, but L4D and other Valve games are the other end of the spectrum. Feels too smooth for the speed the character moves. Just personal preference, I suppose.

Hmm I guess it depends on what character you're moving. It it's a COD game you can expect them to feel more weighty as they're soldiers carrying a whole load of poop around. In left4dead it's a bunch of people running away from zombies wearing regular day clothes.

Alright, honestly, you can't say anything about Left 4 Dead unless A) You have played with friends, or B) You have played Versus. Especially the friends part, that's what makes the game great.

I would like to ask a question I got the LE with a week of DOuble EXP or something I guess I'm late to use it.

But here is a quick rant:

Why the f*ck they included a canteen that can't be used as a water container? Well at least the tin is nice.

They did, last year. You think that World at War will be doing this a year from now?

god forbid they actually give a shit about the community and create some new maps

i mean only 10+ million people bought the game, you'd think they'd show some support

They did and they have, but you're arguing about a game released in 2007. They HAVE had updates it just doesn't need them anymore. And I'll go back to saying the support W@W is giving is the same that COD4 did, so don't say it's better.

My take on this is, permanent Zombie mode. Double XP - weekend only (until the next Double XP weekend).

It is permanent. Not like it was hard to beat the game though. Took me like one weekend to beat it.

Why Halo 3 can't have this?

Braaains is my favorite mode too bad Halo 3 always manage to find a way to ruin something good about itself.

well considering killzone 2 has no CO-OP AT ALL, it already is getting off on a bad start compared to the offerings of similar games such as cod.
but the single player, bot modes, and online looks great in killzone 2.

So you're new to this "Call of Duty" series, you say?

Well you've got to say that the spawning in W@W is worse than any other COD.

AND the map glitches are just terrible.