Oklahoma offers a surprisingly accommodating atmosphere for media producers -- the state offers tax incentives for many creators of TV shows, films and commercials, provided they do said production in-state. Now, Sen. Anthony Sykes (R) is attempting to offer the same sweet deal to creators of video games, but with one small caveat -- the incentives would only apply to developers of games that garner a Teen rating or lower from the ESRB.
It's a policy that's not exactly equal to somewhat similar restrictions placed on the other types incentive-earning media -- for instance, to be eligible, films and TV shows cannot contain child pornography or obscenity, meaning an R rated film or TV-MA show could ostensibly earn the incentive, while a video game adaptation of said film/show likely would not. It's not clear whether the bill will pick up enough momentum to get passed, though a similar bill was successfully adopted in neighboring state Texas.
Reader Comments (83)
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:11PM (Unverified) said
As if there aren't enough shitty games on the market already.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:15PM (Unverified) said
As if there aren't enough violence games on the market already.
Reply
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:40PM WiredKnight said
What are you saying? If a game isn't rated M it's automatically shitty?
If that's the case, you can get right the fuck out.
Reply
If that's the case, you can get right the fuck out.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:34PM (Unverified) said
I think the logical deduction of that comment would be that Uncharted is not rated M and is TOTALLY AWESOME!
Reply
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:18PM ChrisAre said
That's. Fucking. Retarded.
Also, I don't understand the "child pornography" comment. Pretty sure this country has higher restrictions on child pornography than not getting a tax break for filming in Oklahoma. Including that as one of the exceptions is a tad redundant.
Also, I don't understand the "child pornography" comment. Pretty sure this country has higher restrictions on child pornography than not getting a tax break for filming in Oklahoma. Including that as one of the exceptions is a tad redundant.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 4:01PM (Unverified) said
yea whats the point of that???
last check that was ILLEGAL.......
Reply
last check that was ILLEGAL.......
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 6:06PM CheesusCrust said
Why are your comments so sloppy? This once again proves that you are a retard
Reply
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 9:36PM (Unverified) said
@Haggard what's this holocaust you're talking about?
Reply
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 9:47PM (Unverified) said
Ellipsis (plural ellipses; from the Greek: ἔλλειψις, élleipsis, "omission") in printing and writing refers to a mark or series of marks that usually indicate an intentional omission of a word or a phrase from the original text. An ellipsis can also be used to indicate a pause in speech, an unfinished thought or, at the end of a sentence, a trailing off into silence (aposiopesis).
The most common form of an ellipsis is a row of three periods (...).
Reply
The most common form of an ellipsis is a row of three periods (...).
Posted: Jan 27th 2009 3:59AM (Unverified) said
It's a lazy cut and paste job from a mis-type in the original article. My guess is that the author of the original article has intended to type "pornography", but he typed it just below where he typed "Early Childhood" and his brain has played tricks on him and he has typed "child pornography" instead. Joystiq have perpetuated the mistake by ripping off the text.
Reply
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:20PM BigD145 said
Texas did it? Oh, well, then it has to be fucked up.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:21PM (Unverified) said
Maybe if ESRB wasn't so strict when rating games, 70% of them wouldn't be 'Mature'.
Look at Twilight Princess. Humanoid Character + Sword + Cartoon Violence = Teen rating. Compare it with PG-13 The Dark Knight and I'm pretty sure you'll notice a certain hypocrisy here.
Look at Twilight Princess. Humanoid Character + Sword + Cartoon Violence = Teen rating. Compare it with PG-13 The Dark Knight and I'm pretty sure you'll notice a certain hypocrisy here.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 3:25PM Special Agent Steve said
Yeah, Halo could have been teen. "Maybe" the cussing drove it to a M rating, but I still think a 15 year old could of handled it.
Reply
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:39PM Jacksons said
The part that I find annoying is the lack of consistency. The first four Ratchet games had a T rating for mild violence, as does Uncharted which has gunfights with humans, blood, language, suggestive themes, etc. You can find worse things in Saturday morning cartoons than in the first four Ratchet games combined.
Reply
Posted: Jan 26th 2009 12:18PM ThornedVenom said
As a teenager, my cousin and I wanted to buy Halo for his Xbox but couldn't because the employees refused to sell an M-rated game to minors.
So instead we got Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter because it was rated T, being probably one of the only FPSes we were allowed to buy.
Just in case you didn't catch the point of the story: we don't allow teenagers to play sci-fi shooters with aliens, so we'd rather have them play realistic depictions of squad-based warfare.
Reply
So instead we got Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter because it was rated T, being probably one of the only FPSes we were allowed to buy.
Just in case you didn't catch the point of the story: we don't allow teenagers to play sci-fi shooters with aliens, so we'd rather have them play realistic depictions of squad-based warfare.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:22PM Kif said
What is this supposed to do?
Using tax dollars to fund kid-friendly games? Do they think that this will decrease kids' exposure to violent games?
There are already a variety of kid-friendly games for kids to choose from. Adding more isn't going to prevent them from getting the violent ones anyway.
The problem lies in parenting. Maybe they should make a tax incentive for parents who actually give a shit about what their kid is playing.
Using tax dollars to fund kid-friendly games? Do they think that this will decrease kids' exposure to violent games?
There are already a variety of kid-friendly games for kids to choose from. Adding more isn't going to prevent them from getting the violent ones anyway.
The problem lies in parenting. Maybe they should make a tax incentive for parents who actually give a shit about what their kid is playing.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:33PM Batzarro The worlds WOrst Detect said
Tax incentives are not "money-giving". It's "money not taken" from the incentivated.
So, no, not your money.
Reply
So, no, not your money.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 4:08PM Kif said
I still think this will cost the citizens something. The law is designed to get current games manufacturers to make more kids' games. I highly doubt that an already established developer will move to Oklahoma just to get a tax break on kids' games.
It's all speculation from here, though. Perhaps a flood of developers will move to Oklahoma and the break will pay itself off in new tax dollars.
But I really doubt it.
Reply
It's all speculation from here, though. Perhaps a flood of developers will move to Oklahoma and the break will pay itself off in new tax dollars.
But I really doubt it.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 4:56PM Haggard said
Perhaps they won't move, but it might convince some Oklahoma residents to start one up. Although it's a good point that revenue from existing studios will drop.
But I get the feeling that the Oklahoma legislature would not have introduced this fund if it wasn't designed to increase revenue. This is a very circuitous route to attracting the "vidya games are corrupting the children" vote.
Reply
But I get the feeling that the Oklahoma legislature would not have introduced this fund if it wasn't designed to increase revenue. This is a very circuitous route to attracting the "vidya games are corrupting the children" vote.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:00PM Haggard said
The qualifier that the game must be below a certain rating is probably to encourage the economic/revenue side of it whilst protecting against the chance that if the state gives a tax break to the production of a mindless, gory game; then the opposition or the media will question why the government is 'funding the destruction of our kids' or some other unproven BS.
Reply
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 6:13PM Kif said
"But I get the feeling that the Oklahoma legislature would not have introduced this fund if it wasn't designed to increase revenue."
I think we've all seen politicians do stupider things. =)
I don't know what the hell they're thinking. If their main goal was to stimulate the gaming industry, they would have left out the qualifier. If there aren't going to be many new publishers moving in, then the break would be to stimulate the production of kids' games from current developers.
If it is aimed at getting new companies started, then it's a weaker incentive because of the qualifier. But maybe they're trying to kill two birds with one stone? Who knows? Politicians are mysterious in their ways.
Reply
I think we've all seen politicians do stupider things. =)
I don't know what the hell they're thinking. If their main goal was to stimulate the gaming industry, they would have left out the qualifier. If there aren't going to be many new publishers moving in, then the break would be to stimulate the production of kids' games from current developers.
If it is aimed at getting new companies started, then it's a weaker incentive because of the qualifier. But maybe they're trying to kill two birds with one stone? Who knows? Politicians are mysterious in their ways.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:24PM (Unverified) said
Where is this Oklahoma, is it near French Polynesia?
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:24PM War Machine said
So only Wii games get the incentives?
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:34PM (Unverified) said
There's nothing wrong with this, as the comments seem to suggest. Business (tax) incentives are VERY commonplace. That government is looking to be more receptive to developers is a good thing, Joystiq people, not a bad thing.
The fact that it only applies to "non-Mature" games should be common sense to anyone who lives in the United States. No representative wants Bloodfest 5 on the minds of their constituents.
The fact that it only applies to "non-Mature" games should be common sense to anyone who lives in the United States. No representative wants Bloodfest 5 on the minds of their constituents.
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 3:29PM original fred said
They are arguing that the government is using a double standard in comparison to other forms of entertainment. If tax breaks to in-state movie and tv show productions were limited to non-mature products I doubt anyone would be upset about this development.
Reply
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:46PM (Unverified) said
I respectfully disagree with you. Bloodfest 3 and 4 were LEGENDARY and any state would be proud to be home to the fifth and final (and GREATEST) episode of the Bloodfest trilogy!
Reply
Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:41PM WiredKnight said
Besides, let's be realistic. No one makes games in Oklahoma anyway.







