| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (83)

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
As if there aren't enough shitty games on the market already.

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As if there aren't enough violence games on the market already.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I meant shitty! shitty violence games!
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:40PM WiredKnight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What are you saying? If a game isn't rated M it's automatically shitty?

If that's the case, you can get right the fuck out.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Uncharted: Drake's Fortune says "hi".
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 3:33PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Drake's Fortune comment is lost on me. Either you have a boner for Drake, or don't realize your comment is rather out of context; meaningless.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the logical deduction of that comment would be that Uncharted is not rated M and is TOTALLY AWESOME!
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:35PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh really? My bad. I thought for sure it was M, since there are guns and violence and whatnot in it, right?
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 8:25PM Foetoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Super Paper Mario is weeping...

LOOK WHAT YOU'VE DONE!

GTFO
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:18PM ChrisAre said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's. Fucking. Retarded.

Also, I don't understand the "child pornography" comment. Pretty sure this country has higher restrictions on child pornography than not getting a tax break for filming in Oklahoma. Including that as one of the exceptions is a tad redundant.

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:52PM Haggard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Haha exactly

I'm trying to imagine what kind of child pornographer would phone up the state government and ask for a tax break.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 4:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
yea whats the point of that???

last check that was ILLEGAL.......
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 6:06PM CheesusCrust said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Why are your comments so sloppy? This once again proves that you are a retard
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 6:14PM ChrisAre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@game

Are you referring to my comments? Regardless of who you're talking to you're a creepo. Go away.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 7:05PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nah he's talking to Aggie.

The guy puts ... in his comments a bit and everyone acts as if he's denying the holocaust or something.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 7:11PM ChrisAre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...?
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Haggard what's this holocaust you're talking about?
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 9:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ellipsis (plural ellipses; from the Greek: ἔλλειψις, élleipsis, "omission") in printing and writing refers to a mark or series of marks that usually indicate an intentional omission of a word or a phrase from the original text. An ellipsis can also be used to indicate a pause in speech, an unfinished thought or, at the end of a sentence, a trailing off into silence (aposiopesis).

The most common form of an ellipsis is a row of three periods (...).
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2009 3:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's a lazy cut and paste job from a mis-type in the original article. My guess is that the author of the original article has intended to type "pornography", but he typed it just below where he typed "Early Childhood" and his brain has played tricks on him and he has typed "child pornography" instead. Joystiq have perpetuated the mistake by ripping off the text.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:20PM BigD145 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Texas did it? Oh, well, then it has to be fucked up.

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 3:08PM Marius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
-1 for you
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 3:31PM MarkezJM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
+1 for you. If TX did it, it's fucked up.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 3:41PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For anyone that down voted me, this is Texas we're talking about. The same Texas where members of the House reach around and vote other members' votes.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 3:54PM Hyams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I love how BigD got voted down, but Markez got voted up, even though they both said the exact same thing. XD
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:49PM Lone Starr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
^

It's the tone in which it was said.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Maybe if ESRB wasn't so strict when rating games, 70% of them wouldn't be 'Mature'.

Look at Twilight Princess. Humanoid Character + Sword + Cartoon Violence = Teen rating. Compare it with PG-13 The Dark Knight and I'm pretty sure you'll notice a certain hypocrisy here.

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:37PM Hyams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The double standards annoy me to no end. Videogames are held to far stricter guidelines than any other type of media.

Material that could get away with a 12 rating in movies could be given a 15 (or even an 18) rating in a game.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 3:25PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, Halo could have been teen. "Maybe" the cussing drove it to a M rating, but I still think a 15 year old could of handled it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:39PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The part that I find annoying is the lack of consistency. The first four Ratchet games had a T rating for mild violence, as does Uncharted which has gunfights with humans, blood, language, suggestive themes, etc. You can find worse things in Saturday morning cartoons than in the first four Ratchet games combined.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2009 12:18PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As a teenager, my cousin and I wanted to buy Halo for his Xbox but couldn't because the employees refused to sell an M-rated game to minors.

So instead we got Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter because it was rated T, being probably one of the only FPSes we were allowed to buy.



Just in case you didn't catch the point of the story: we don't allow teenagers to play sci-fi shooters with aliens, so we'd rather have them play realistic depictions of squad-based warfare.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:22PM Kif said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
What is this supposed to do?
Using tax dollars to fund kid-friendly games? Do they think that this will decrease kids' exposure to violent games?

There are already a variety of kid-friendly games for kids to choose from. Adding more isn't going to prevent them from getting the violent ones anyway.

The problem lies in parenting. Maybe they should make a tax incentive for parents who actually give a shit about what their kid is playing.

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:33PM Batzarro The worlds WOrst Detect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tax incentives are not "money-giving". It's "money not taken" from the incentivated.

So, no, not your money.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:44PM Kif said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"money not taken" is still money that the government won't have to govern, which is their job. The money still has to come from somewhere; tax incentives aren't free to the citizens.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:55PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They attract game development studios who wouldn't ordinarily exist in that particular state.

This game development studio earns money for the state economy, and is still taxed - thereby the citizens of that state aren't "paying" for anything.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 4:08PM Kif said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I still think this will cost the citizens something. The law is designed to get current games manufacturers to make more kids' games. I highly doubt that an already established developer will move to Oklahoma just to get a tax break on kids' games.

It's all speculation from here, though. Perhaps a flood of developers will move to Oklahoma and the break will pay itself off in new tax dollars.

But I really doubt it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 4:56PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Perhaps they won't move, but it might convince some Oklahoma residents to start one up. Although it's a good point that revenue from existing studios will drop.

But I get the feeling that the Oklahoma legislature would not have introduced this fund if it wasn't designed to increase revenue. This is a very circuitous route to attracting the "vidya games are corrupting the children" vote.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:00PM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The qualifier that the game must be below a certain rating is probably to encourage the economic/revenue side of it whilst protecting against the chance that if the state gives a tax break to the production of a mindless, gory game; then the opposition or the media will question why the government is 'funding the destruction of our kids' or some other unproven BS.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 6:13PM Kif said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"But I get the feeling that the Oklahoma legislature would not have introduced this fund if it wasn't designed to increase revenue."

I think we've all seen politicians do stupider things. =)

I don't know what the hell they're thinking. If their main goal was to stimulate the gaming industry, they would have left out the qualifier. If there aren't going to be many new publishers moving in, then the break would be to stimulate the production of kids' games from current developers.

If it is aimed at getting new companies started, then it's a weaker incentive because of the qualifier. But maybe they're trying to kill two birds with one stone? Who knows? Politicians are mysterious in their ways.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2009 3:16AM Haggard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well like I said, they might want to stimulate the games industry without getting crucified at the next election for giving a tax break to the next GTA.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Where is this Oklahoma, is it near French Polynesia?

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:34PM ChrisAre said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Leave it to the French... and the Polynesian...
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:24PM War Machine said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So only Wii games get the incentives?

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:32PM Mr Khan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That would explain why it's selling so well, then, if people under 17 can actually play them
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:38PM Hyams said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hah, Khan just pwned you. XD
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 7:56PM War Machine said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My point exactly, they don't need more help.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
There's nothing wrong with this, as the comments seem to suggest. Business (tax) incentives are VERY commonplace. That government is looking to be more receptive to developers is a good thing, Joystiq people, not a bad thing.

The fact that it only applies to "non-Mature" games should be common sense to anyone who lives in the United States. No representative wants Bloodfest 5 on the minds of their constituents.

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 3:29PM original fred said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They are arguing that the government is using a double standard in comparison to other forms of entertainment. If tax breaks to in-state movie and tv show productions were limited to non-mature products I doubt anyone would be upset about this development.
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 5:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I respectfully disagree with you. Bloodfest 3 and 4 were LEGENDARY and any state would be proud to be home to the fifth and final (and GREATEST) episode of the Bloodfest trilogy!
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 7:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's not a trilogy if there's 4 games...
Reply

Posted: Jan 25th 2009 2:41PM WiredKnight said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Besides, let's be realistic. No one makes games in Oklahoma anyway.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW