We'd wager that the first time the gaming community collectively booted up Running With Scissors' Gary Coleman-rich urination sim, Postal 2, we all shared the same thought: that this game absolutely needs to be showcased in some sort of museum commemorating mankind's greatest accomplishments. If memory serves, many of the title's reviews included similar sentiments.
Finally, that observation is being realized. Sweden's Nobel Museum, whose galleries are littered with installations denoting the achievements of Nobel laureates (as well as the life of the prize's progenitor, Alfred Nobel), will be including Postal 2 in a new exhibit titled "Freedom of Speech: How Free is Free?" The game will be included in a section that focuses on censorship in the video game industry. We're really happy such an exhibit exists; we just wish they'd picked a ... well, a good controversial game.
Reader Comments (25)
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 4:37PM Dirty said
I think that this would be more appropriate and interesting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Columbine_Massacre_RPG!
It certainly is cause for much more dialog.
Reply
It certainly is cause for much more dialog.
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 5:08PM (Unverified) said
That was in 2005 Dirty, but is actually more interesting than this.
Reply
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 4:40PM (Unverified) said
I'm kind of glad the game is getting some publicity. I always liked the devs
Reply
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 4:41PM (Unverified) said
wow, its surprising how much of the world still has no idea the difference between actual controversy and "Look! You can pee on some dude! We're so edgy and controversial!! Please write about us!"
Reply
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 4:44PM (Unverified) said
Why?
I think Postal makes a much better example for such exhibit than any other controversial game, aside from Columbine RPG, Dirty mentioned.
Reply
I think Postal makes a much better example for such exhibit than any other controversial game, aside from Columbine RPG, Dirty mentioned.
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 6:16PM Haggard said
But it's controversy for controversy's sake. There's no reason you can piss on people, or use cats as gun silencers (in the new one?); it's just there to whip up a media frenzy and in the process whip up sales figures.
A game that explores controversial themes as a device for wider social commentary or philosophical implications is far more worthy as an example in a debate on freedom of speech.
Reply
A game that explores controversial themes as a device for wider social commentary or philosophical implications is far more worthy as an example in a debate on freedom of speech.
Posted: Feb 20th 2009 2:33PM (Unverified) said
Mixed feelings about this one - I like that video games are being seen as important cultural expressions, but this seems kind of negative, especially in light of the game they chose. Like Griffin says there are much better - and controversial - games out there. I just hope the video game exhibit doesn't go next to the neo-nazi sheet music exhibit.
Reply
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 5:01PM galfridus73 said
"...we just wish they'd picked a ... well, a good controversial game."
No, you don't.
A good game would stand on its own merits as it is a good game. GTA: San Andreas is well worth playing and, therefore, it can stand on its own against its critics.
Postal 2, however, has to rely on the Larry Flynt argument of freedom of speech. Therefore, it may be degrading, poorly done, and generally disregarded, but it is still covered as allowable within the concept of free speech.
It is generally the stuff we dislike that we have the hardest time making the argument that they are covered under free speech, but they will fail in the end because of the message they deliver.
In the end, we can't discriminate by way of taste as to what deserves recognition in this sort of forum - we have to allow all of it or allow none of it.
Reply
No, you don't.
A good game would stand on its own merits as it is a good game. GTA: San Andreas is well worth playing and, therefore, it can stand on its own against its critics.
Postal 2, however, has to rely on the Larry Flynt argument of freedom of speech. Therefore, it may be degrading, poorly done, and generally disregarded, but it is still covered as allowable within the concept of free speech.
It is generally the stuff we dislike that we have the hardest time making the argument that they are covered under free speech, but they will fail in the end because of the message they deliver.
In the end, we can't discriminate by way of taste as to what deserves recognition in this sort of forum - we have to allow all of it or allow none of it.
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 8:21PM JoshMilewski said
"It is generally the stuff we dislike that we have the hardest time making the argument that they are covered under free speech, but they will fail in the end because of the message they deliver."
Wait, I don't understand that sentence.
Anyway, yes, I do agree that free speech (and press, etc.) has no limits, unless of course someone is being forced into something against their will (like real-life child pornography).
Reply
Wait, I don't understand that sentence.
Anyway, yes, I do agree that free speech (and press, etc.) has no limits, unless of course someone is being forced into something against their will (like real-life child pornography).
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 8:41PM galfridus73 said
Yeah, I was at work and a little rushed.
Generally, I was getting at the idea that, while it's difficult for us to defend something like Postal 2 under the auspices of "free speech" because we don't like it, the reality is that, if it's not worthwhile, it'll fail on its own - no censorship required.
Reply
Generally, I was getting at the idea that, while it's difficult for us to defend something like Postal 2 under the auspices of "free speech" because we don't like it, the reality is that, if it's not worthwhile, it'll fail on its own - no censorship required.
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 10:42PM JoshMilewski said
That's about right.
And besides, I'd rather default to the "no censorship" side than risk any damage that could be done *with* censorship.
Reply
And besides, I'd rather default to the "no censorship" side than risk any damage that could be done *with* censorship.
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 5:48PM BananaBoat said
LBP comes to mind for the whole lyrics censorship thing. Decent, family friendly game, censored because of lyrics that maybe 0.001% of the games target audience could understand anyway. It wasn't a big deal until they made it a big deal, just like most of the things they've censored in the past (Hot Coffee for instance. You had to mod the freaking game to even see that mini-game, yet it caused a full blown recall at a cost of millions of real dollars.)
It's such a shame that stores absolutely will not carry AO rated games. Why should retail outlets be able to dictate what content I can and cannot see? It's crazy, especially considering that AO games flow out of Japan like candy, and their country hasn't gone mad with sexual hysteria yet (on the contrary....their birth rate is in a free fall).
I'm so annoyed that they chose Postal 2 of all games to be in the exhibit. Normal people would take one look at it, and think that the censors are right in what they are doing.
Reply
It's such a shame that stores absolutely will not carry AO rated games. Why should retail outlets be able to dictate what content I can and cannot see? It's crazy, especially considering that AO games flow out of Japan like candy, and their country hasn't gone mad with sexual hysteria yet (on the contrary....their birth rate is in a free fall).
I'm so annoyed that they chose Postal 2 of all games to be in the exhibit. Normal people would take one look at it, and think that the censors are right in what they are doing.
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 6:22PM Haggard said
There's at least a billion muslims in the world - and some of the richest countries are muslim countries. Standard of living in the middle east, Turkey, and Afghanistan is high enough that a decent sized number of people might be targeted by this game. And as one that stands apart from violent or controversial themes, it's even more likely to be acceptable.
The thing is, to Muslims any transformation of the Koran into musical lyrics is forbidden. And if you realise that your game has the potential to break a religious law of a large chunk of the world's human biomass, recalling it is a fairly logical step.
Reply
The thing is, to Muslims any transformation of the Koran into musical lyrics is forbidden. And if you realise that your game has the potential to break a religious law of a large chunk of the world's human biomass, recalling it is a fairly logical step.
Posted: Jan 29th 2009 11:13AM BananaBoat said
Meh. Games have been known to assault my religion, and I've never thrown a fit over it.
Reply
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 5:57PM Shagittarius said
While this game wasn't a great game most of the reviews were a kneejerk reaction to the violence present in the video game. I think this game is actually a good choice for the 'freedom of speech' exhibit. It certainly took knocks from reviews presenting a side of free speech they didn't want to see.
Reply
Posted: Jan 28th 2009 9:26PM Grey Acumen said
I thought this said PORTAL 2 to be featured.
Man... talk about a disappointment.
Reply
Man... talk about a disappointment.
Posted: Jan 29th 2009 7:37AM (Unverified) said
Best reviwe ever: "Until someone boxes up syphilis and tries to sell it at retail, Postal 2 is the worst product ever foisted upon consumers." LOL
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments









