| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (15)

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 8:50PM falcomadol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please tell me that people from Southpeak didn't crash the forum dressed in turkey outfits.

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 8:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you can't fit content into your "development schedule", tell that schedule to fuck off. You have a valid reason: You won't release it until its done. I understand having to please the publishers stockholders, but remember back when games weren't released until they were ready? Remember how awesome it was NOT running into a game breaking glitch and NOT having to put up with the developer saying "We'll get around to that...eventually. For Realzies!" Lets go back to those days

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 9:05PM Pojomofo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
here is a link to the definition of "contractual obligation"

http://dictionary.bnet.com/definition/contractual+obligation.html
Reply

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 11:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"If you can't fit content into your "development schedule", tell that schedule to fuck off. You have a valid reason: You won't release it until its done."

Unfortunately unless their name is Blizzard or Valve, they simply can't do that. The reason? They have a set window for release to maximize sales. Blizz and Valve have a track record of when they release their games, it will sell like gangbusters regardless of what time of the year it's released.

Delay a game what 4 - 6 months? That could potentially cost millions of dollars considering the development staff these games require.

Remember a lot of these studios are not in charge. If they take too much time or the development costs run too high, the publisher will just shut them down and cancel the game. Especially when it's a new IP (Bioshock) or a developer is taking over a franchise and there is a lot of criticism from the public (Fallout).

Imagine a movie had their release date for the 4th of July holiday in the US. Then all of a sudden the director told the studio "It's not ready yet. Screw you it's not coming out." Tell me that the director wouldn't be fired on the spot.
Reply

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 9:05PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
fallout 3 + bioshock = win? that could work y'know.

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 9:05PM Dave Hinkle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is it just me, or does Ken Levine very much look like Steve Carell?

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 9:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
he looks like if Steve Carell and Clifford B. had a baby
Reply

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 9:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, like a young Steve Carell.
Reply

Posted: Feb 7th 2009 9:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I came into the comments thread specifically to make the same observation!
Reply

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 9:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
SYSTEM SHOCK 3 NAO.

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 11:30PM Discotheque said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hell Yes! Glad to see King's Bounty was mentioned

Posted: Feb 6th 2009 11:40PM Bananarama said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't really get the huge love for Kings Bounty, it's essentially a prettier Heroes of Might and Magic, though doesn't seem, at least to me, to be as much fun.
Reply

Posted: Feb 7th 2009 1:19AM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does this panel exist in video form somewhere on the internets? =/

Posted: Feb 7th 2009 7:03AM Bowser Rogozhin said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Forget about the vidya, Bananaboat. With Croal on the panel I'm sure the conversation will be an utter borefest. Types like him want to take gaming, or a sub-section at least, into the Film Studies arena: closed off to only those who play games with the 'right approach.' By the 'right approach', meaning you have to have read 10 essays on Kirkegaard, or some other dead, irrelevant existentialist. Fun is not the priority for the Croal-types: a justification for the school fees expunged, a justification for the 'lowly journalism' they've taken up is what they desire. And the fundamental need to hear their own voice. This is paramount.

At his base, I'm sure he despises video games; the fleetingness of it all, the backwardness of the subject manner, the prole players, the gaudy lights, the whole everything. I'm pretty sure he hardly plays video games, especially seeing as he only picked up a controller in 1999. Hardly gives him concrete experience, hardly makes his voice credible. It's just a gig to types like him, and once this gaming bubble bursts he'll abscond to another 'tech' field, him being a 'tech' journalist and all.

Posted: Feb 7th 2009 3:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. i asked that question on DLC yesterday. I understand that there are time constraints but certain thing really have no value or merit to be DLC. I also used SF 4 as an example of charging extra for costumes which i thought is insane. Just look at the new Tomb raider situation, The DLC was part of the game then taken out!

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW