| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (23)

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
hahaha! I'd like to see the super console required to play crysis!

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:22PM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes Crysis looks great, not mindblowing, but great.

But, keep it noted that the game has to have been poorly coded. It has to have been, because the the expansion looked the same, but with an upgrade in speed.

Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:30PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I had played Crysis in DX9 mode for a long while and it looked quite decent in medium on a Geforce 7900GT and High on an HD4850. But I've recently got to try it out in Very High mode in DX10 with a GTX 285 and there is a nice difference. The added motion blur effects add a lot to the game and the cutscenes now are quite impressive to watch. Unfortunately, there is a nice FPS drop from DX9 to DX10 but for me, its worth it actually. Too bad it still doesn't look as good as the intro movie in the game. : )
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 7:45PM Lennoko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
my 900$ build plays Crysis just fine! This 5000$ computer stuff is of the past.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:30PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm still anxiously waiting for a sequel to Crysis, damn that cliffhanger!!!

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:33PM F1 Basu Gasu Bakuhatsu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cryteks counsel name; Skynet.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wouldn't be surprised if their first game comes out on the next gen of consoles as opposed to this generation we're currently in. Unless they do a rush job and they don't seem like that kind of developer.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 3:16PM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Aww, c'mon guys, he's being perfectly reasonable here. No need to nega-nuke him.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 5:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol what did he say that got you people's panties all in a twist? Seems like he is making a reasonable assumption to me.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 7:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Come on timesplitters 4! :D

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:40PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The title seems misleading, I thought it meant that Crytek was developing it's own console. Even the article itself makes it sound like that's what they're doing.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought the exact same thing.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not too much caring for Crysis on PS360 since I have Crysis & Crysis Warhead on PC, but it would be nice to see what they cook up over the next year or so. because they were talking about NEXT Gen Specs and we all know thats 5-6 years away.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 3:13PM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
5 to 6 years? Try 3 to 4, more likely.

Console generations typically last around 6 years, and we're already into the seventh gen's 4th year. This gen may be slightly longer than past ones, but I can't imagine it surpassing 8 years.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 3:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
maybe. but I'm just taking into account that with things the way they are we KNOW Sony doesn't have the resources to Devote to PS4(Even IF it uses the Cell still), MS is making TOO much off the 360 to want to kill that anytime soon, and hell Nintendo will print money off the Wii until their sales dip below 15 Million a year and we all know that wont happen anytime soon.

And what the hell got me voted down this time? is it because I have a PC that can play Crysis?? or Because I said 5-6 years for next gen consoles??? or maybe its just people hating on my still, lol
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 3:35PM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
360 fans voted you down for all the pro-PS3 posts you've made,

PS3 fans voted you down when they saw your XBL account and felt betrayed.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 3:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol, hell I have a 360 now. Got Tired of Waiting to hear if Fable 2 & Gears 2 were going to be on PC or not, those are 2 very good games that I dont want to miss out on so how they they fault me for getting a 360?? still going to buy my Multi-platgorm games on PS3 because after my Free month of Gold is up I wont be playing anything online via 360 for a while

and the XBox fanboys can kiss my ass. lol
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:50PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not sure Crytek has any console experience. It was Ubisoft, the guys that published Far Cry on PC that developed and published Far Cry for the Xbox, 360 and Wii.

No offense to console gamers, I really hope that future Crysis games will not be console ports to the PC, I hope they develop different versions for the consoles and PC. F.E.A.R 2 was designed for consoles and ported to PC whereas it was vice versa for the original game to the 360, you can see it was simplified and a bit dumbed down.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:53PM Dave Hinkle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, sorry about that. My bad.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 3:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is one of the reasons I am actually avoiding F.E.A.R. 2. I loved the first on the PC when it came out in October 2005, but playing the demo really showed they were catering to a different crowd. They shouldn't have removed the ability to peak around corners, and the fact that the game forced you into a 16:9 aspect ratio all the time was annoying for me as my monitor is 1920x1200. They also simplified some of their parallax mapping effects, particle effects, volumetric dust/smoke and volumetric lights. The first game on the PC toyed around with the idea of dynamic soft shadows, and it's a shame to see the sequel did not build off of that with an improved lighting engine.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 4:08PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yep, I loved the original FEAR and even liked the expansions and so was waiting anxiously for the sequel, would have probably bought it on day one. But after playing the PC demo and seeing how its catered towards the console crowd and also not really following the story of the original, not playing as the Point Man, etc. I'm gonna wait until its $20 or below. : (
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2009 2:35PM Liquidmark said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, Fear 2 didn't cut the mustard by console standards either. Look at the scores.

Can't blame consoles the bad design choices in FEAR 2, especially since the original FEAR didn't do anything that couldn't be done on a console as well.

Blame the developers for not thinking outside of the box.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 4:15PM jaydark123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn, I just want Timesplitters 4. They need to get on the ball and continue with the making of Timesplitters 4.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW