| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (74)

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 12:31PM MPTownes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn, man. I was going to post something along those lines, but you were far more eloquent than I was planning to be.

I love Watchmen, but this does smack of nothing more than a cynical cash-grab.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 12:53PM Onomah said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While in theory you have a solid argument, it falls a bit flat when you consider that a cosmetic resemblance to watchmen is going to be enough for a great legion of people.
This isn't just a bad Watchmen game, this is a bad game. It is a bad game and it is going to sell, not because of its merit but because it is associated with an extremely popular and well loved piece of fiction. They have put in the minimum of effort because they didn't really want to make a game, what they wanted to make was money.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. My logic is meant to criticize more the buyers of this type of processed entertainment. The companies responsible for its producing are well aware of the childlike mentality of their consumer base and therefore take advantage of it.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or I suppose I am merely pointing out the completely disjointed nature of the quality of the source material with the quality of the end product.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Yourself

Well put. It's the same thing I thought when they made a fighting game out of Fight Club. It shows such an inherent lack of comprehension of what the source material was actually about that it's almost funny. Almost. It's like watching Schindler's List and thinking, "This would make a really cool first-person-shooter!"
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 12:47PM doom saber said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have read the graphic novel a month ago and loved it. I have heard that the last issue will be altered in the film. For instance:





*spoilers*
The squid is removed and has blue lazer balls attackin the globe instead or so the the rumors said. *end spoiler*


I can understand why the scene was changed but I wonder if the change would be faithful to the original piece though I have heard rumors it isn't.

I also think I have indirectly got my friend to get the graphic novel since he is not a comicbook reader and decided to buy the novel after me tellin him how good it is.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:12PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It really needed to be a point and click adventure. Watchmen was never about action.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:34PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People need to remember that prior to the events of Watchmen, Rorschach and Nite Owl were regular crimefighters and since this game takes place before the Keene Act, it makes complete senese that these characters would spend their nights fighting crime.

If this were a game based on the events of the GN, then I agree that maybe something other than a beat-em-up would be better(like maybe an rpg or something), but since it's not, I'm okay with it as long as the game is decent.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 1:50PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I've never heard or read about the Watchmen until they started showing previews for the movie, but I gotta say I think it looks ridiculous. There's some glowing blue guy who looks like he's from Star Trek and some guy who looks like Batman. Me and my girlfriend thought it was a Batman parody, I was expecting the Wayans brothers to pop out. I don't know how well this movie is going to play to an audience who aren't familiar with the characters, and that the charactes look, in my opinion, rather silly.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:04PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The fanboy in me wants to beat the shit out of you for being so stupid. Do your ignorant ass a favor and go read the book.

And by now I realize you could be a troll.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:28PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Vegeta- Seriously, I'm not trying to troll. I'm just unfamiliar with the Watchmen, and judging by what I've seen in the previews, it doesn't look that interesting. That could (and probably is) because it's a movie, so there's going to be a lot left out in terms of character and story development. But for someone who doesn't read comic books I thought the preview looked silly.

If anything it makes me realize that a Halo or Gears movie probably wouldn't do too well because the masses are unfamiliar with the story and they'd be left wondering "who was that guy in the spacesuit talking to the naked hologram chick?"
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1/10, got me to reply, nice trolling bro.

Presuming in the OFF CHANCE YOU'RE NOT TROLLING, there's a book called Watchmen in which said characters appear and are made plausible. But who am I kidding, you're just attention whoring.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Again, operating under the assumption that you're not trolling, I direct you to the wikipedia article on Watchmen (side note: It's a common mistake to add "The" to the title, which isn't actually there), and to the book proper. If you haven't seen the trailers, the fiction operates under an alternate history, where (among other things) we won Vietnam, and in which costumed superheroes (none of which have any powers save blue guy) have existed and operated until an act outlawing them. In this alternate 1985, one former costume is murdered, which spirals outward and sets the plot in motion.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:46PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The fact is Watchmen is a deconstruction of the superhero genre, bringing the idea of superheros to a more realistic level, giving each of the main characters human flaws and the story ends in a way that is not typical of a superhero comic.

There's a reason why it's considered to be one of the greatest graphic novels of all time.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:52PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks for the info Juno Loire, I'm reading the wikipedia entry right now. Sorry that I came across as a troll, but not everyone knows what Watchmen are!
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 4:22PM alu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the OP has a very valid point.. the trailer is absolutely horrible, if i didn't read the GN i would have the same assumption.

i don't know how anyone could describe what watchmen is about in 30sec but they definitely don't portray the awesome story properly in that it's really a crime thriller with plot twists and who did what's etc..
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 5:45PM mattimus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"There's some glowing blue guy who looks like he's from Star Trek and some guy who looks like Batman. Me and my girlfriend thought it was a Batman parody, I was expecting the Wayans brothers to pop out."

For the love of god, upvote this guy. You may not be trolling Guilty Fart, but that is f*cking histerical.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it's $10 or less then I'll definitely be buying it, if it's any more then $10, I'll pass, I mean I'm a Watchmen fan, but for $15 I can buy Watchmen action figures, which are evidently better then this game.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 2:54PM snarfoogle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's harsh. Now I do not want.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 3:52PM ZeroCorpse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game makes Alan Moore cry.

Actually, he whinges like a child whenever anybody does anything with his characters, so there's really no pleasing his cranky old ass. Bring on the Rorschach underwear!

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 4:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Knowing how much this will upset Alan Moore, I only wish I could buy it twice.

As for it being a beat-em-up, doesn't bother me. Was a really big Streets of Rage fan, so I wouldn't mind some retro-gaming with modern graphics.

Posted: Feb 11th 2009 6:00PM Brando Calrissian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why is "Watchmen is regarded by many to be one of the greatest graphic novels of all time." always the first line of every single article written about WATCHMEN? Next time start off with something like "Remember the time Dr. Manhattan created multiple forms of himself so he could nail his wife and still get some work done?"

Posted: Feb 12th 2009 7:36AM oteriba said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bravo, Joystiq. All the other outlets seem to be fellating this game but you come and tell it like it is. Kudos.

Posted: Feb 16th 2009 12:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait, Trebek...
The comedian shooting a pregnant woman, but Jessica Alba not being topless for 10 seconds is a huge thing?

So they changed the ending. They CHANGED the ending; what the actual "thing" is. Not what the ending is.

They also aren't putting the pirate comics in the movie, and those are extremely relevant to the movie.
*note; they are apparantly filming the pirate comics, and will release that as a stand alone DVD possibly packaged or as a bonus in the Watchmen DVD, and there will probably be an "Ultimate Edition" that's about 5 hours long released at some point, with those scenes intact*

The exclusion of that stuff is why they can't have the ending the same way.

Most Watchmen fans (not fanboys, who are rabid and would freak out if one of Rorschachs inkblots didn't look exactly like in the comic), FANS, are extremely excited about the movie.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW