Nintendo issued a celebratory press release following the announcement of the NPD numbers last night, pointing out an impressive statistic: "While the video game industry grew by $150 million (12 percent) year-on-year, Nintendo's total sales grew by $300 million in January, offsetting declines on other platforms." Nintendo is basically compensating for the whole industry's decline at this point, at least in terms of financial growth. No doubt Nintendo is pleased to have a new angle to talk about in its monthly statement of how awesome it is.
The company said that sales of the Wii grew 148 percent in January 2009 over January 2008, and DS sales grew 99 percent. It also pointed out that 20 of the top 30 games last month were produced for Nintendo systems, including five of the top ten -- six, we must point out, if you count Guitar Hero: World Tour.
Reader Comments (41)
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 11:24AM (Unverified) said
Nintendo and Microsoft seem to be talking but look at this article from MVC
"NPD: Sony silent after January losses
PS3 platform holder keeps quiet after 25 per cent annual PS3 sales decrease in January
Sony is the only one of the three platform holders to not yet issue a statement after NPD’s January stats for the North American market showed that PS3 was the only major console to see an annual decline in monthly sales."
Reply
"NPD: Sony silent after January losses
PS3 platform holder keeps quiet after 25 per cent annual PS3 sales decrease in January
Sony is the only one of the three platform holders to not yet issue a statement after NPD’s January stats for the North American market showed that PS3 was the only major console to see an annual decline in monthly sales."
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 11:43AM copa said
This is actually the PS3's third-straight month of year-over-year sales declines in the NPD's. And the PS3 is cheaper, and has better software, than it did a year ago.
Every successful console in history has sales increases at this stage of their lifecycle, not decreases. Sony knows they need a $100 price cut, but there are worrisome signs that they simply may not be able to afford it.
It is a safe bet that the losing streak will be halted this month when Killzone 2 is released. If it doesn't... well, let's just assume that it does.
Reply
Every successful console in history has sales increases at this stage of their lifecycle, not decreases. Sony knows they need a $100 price cut, but there are worrisome signs that they simply may not be able to afford it.
It is a safe bet that the losing streak will be halted this month when Killzone 2 is released. If it doesn't... well, let's just assume that it does.
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 12:14PM Shagittarius said
Also interesting to consider is that with the Wii being so popular it's probably a lot of peoples first console purchase this gen. Since we're in such an economic slump its probably safe to assume that more users will try to get by with just 1 system. In effect the hype and momentum of the Wii is simply canabalizing the other consoles in hard economic times.
Reply
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 1:40PM GameboyHippo said
Everytime I read articles, I remember the EGM magazine cover that said:
PS3 (in very large letters)
XBox 360 (in medium sized letters)
Revolution (in small letters)
All I have to say is "HA HA!"
Reply
PS3 (in very large letters)
XBox 360 (in medium sized letters)
Revolution (in small letters)
All I have to say is "HA HA!"
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 12:23AM (Unverified) said
Don't worry. Everyone is a winner with the NPD press releases.... its just talking sony a little longer than ususal to work out how they won this time.
Reply
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 11:48AM copa said
Those Wii Fit numbers are astonishing. I had no idea the sales numbers were so supply constrained.
Yes, Nintendo has been brilliant. My kids are the primary users of the Wii and DS in my house, but Nintendo puts out a lot of great software like Super Mario Galaxy and Mario Kart DS that I can enjoy with them.
Recession or no recession, Nintendo has been masterful.
Reply
Yes, Nintendo has been brilliant. My kids are the primary users of the Wii and DS in my house, but Nintendo puts out a lot of great software like Super Mario Galaxy and Mario Kart DS that I can enjoy with them.
Recession or no recession, Nintendo has been masterful.
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 12:04PM Shagittarius said
Besides their bottom line this would be desirable for actual end users. They could make their own joysticks and software for other platforms. I think most people who are avid gamers would like to reduce the number of consoles they have to by each generation, specifically one that is so underpowered.
Reply
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 4:00PM gatorboi352 said
"specifically one that is so underpowered."
When will people get over this false stigma. It is a NON-ISSUE poeple!
Reply
When will people get over this false stigma. It is a NON-ISSUE poeple!
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 2:14PM (Unverified) said
Nintendo is competing now? Didn't they say they weren't competing?
Reply
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 11:52AM (Unverified) said
I still don't see why the Wii is successful. I haven't bought a game for mine in over a year. I have no reason to turn it on. And Nintendo's claim that 20 of the top 30 games were released for their systems, I'd like to see how the sales numbers break down for that. I doubt people are buying the Wii version for most of those games.
Hardly any of the games released used the Wii's "innovative" controller in an "innovative" way.
I's a fad, but its a big fad, and it's not going away. I just don't get it.
*waits for the N fanboys to give me a bunch of childish and nonsensical reasons of why the Wii is awesome (it's really not by the way)
Reply
Hardly any of the games released used the Wii's "innovative" controller in an "innovative" way.
I's a fad, but its a big fad, and it's not going away. I just don't get it.
*waits for the N fanboys to give me a bunch of childish and nonsensical reasons of why the Wii is awesome (it's really not by the way)
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 12:00PM (Unverified) said
The key here is that you bought one, so they still got you.
Reply
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 12:13PM (Unverified) said
Hi, I'm not going to give you any reasons about why the Wii is awesome, because you're mind is set. However, I would like to point out that the 20 out of the top 30 were on Nintendo systems. That statement implies software attributed to the Wii and DS. True, we don't have an accurate breakdown of the proper software distribution. However, it would be a reasonable assumption that DS software would account for a sizable percentage of that breakdown.
Reply
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 1:12PM wcanyon said
It's successful because it has cross-family appeal: kids can play Mario Kart and the mom can get her yoga on w/ Wii Fit. Dad? I dunno, there's not a lot of games for adult guys. Mad World? Still, I'm a parent and I really dig Mario Kart :)
Contrast that with the 360 and PS3 that are viewed as "gamer" machines.
Reply
Contrast that with the 360 and PS3 that are viewed as "gamer" machines.
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 1:12PM lemurpants said
"I haven't bought a game for mine in over a year. I have no reason to turn it on."
These statements might be related.
Reply
These statements might be related.
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 3:19PM guttertalk said
I think you have something of a point, in that aspects of the Wii controls work better as accent controls rather than main controls, like the use of the mic or stylus on the DS. But some games do use it extensively.
I see four key points about the Wii controls:
1. Motion control - The waggle is used poorly in games, which gives the Wii controls a bad name over all. I just picked up Madden 09 All-Play, and after playing for years with a traditional controller, I love it.
2. IR pointing - This is an important but sometimes overlooked part of the Wii controls. Games like Battalion Wars 2 and FPS use this aspect a lot.
3. Split controllers - This has little to do with the actual control of the game, but it's a usability point, one that I love. Sometimes, I only need to use one hand, allowing me to rest the other. (As a gamer in my 40s, believe me, this is a bigger deal than you might think.)
4. Simplified buttons - Nintendo made a great leap in controller design with the NES controller, and I think they've made a good one here. Besides the split controllers, I like the simplicity of the buttons. And for those new to gaming, it's probably less intimidating. 360: 12 buttons, 1 d-pad, and 2 sticks vs. Wii: 7 buttons, 1 d-pad (with nunchuk: 9 buttons, 1 d-pad, and 1 stick). This button scheme has forced game developers to either simplify their game controls or get creative and incorporate motion controls.
Reply
I see four key points about the Wii controls:
1. Motion control - The waggle is used poorly in games, which gives the Wii controls a bad name over all. I just picked up Madden 09 All-Play, and after playing for years with a traditional controller, I love it.
2. IR pointing - This is an important but sometimes overlooked part of the Wii controls. Games like Battalion Wars 2 and FPS use this aspect a lot.
3. Split controllers - This has little to do with the actual control of the game, but it's a usability point, one that I love. Sometimes, I only need to use one hand, allowing me to rest the other. (As a gamer in my 40s, believe me, this is a bigger deal than you might think.)
4. Simplified buttons - Nintendo made a great leap in controller design with the NES controller, and I think they've made a good one here. Besides the split controllers, I like the simplicity of the buttons. And for those new to gaming, it's probably less intimidating. 360: 12 buttons, 1 d-pad, and 2 sticks vs. Wii: 7 buttons, 1 d-pad (with nunchuk: 9 buttons, 1 d-pad, and 1 stick). This button scheme has forced game developers to either simplify their game controls or get creative and incorporate motion controls.
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 4:52PM Mr Khan said
statistics have proven that not only are people buying software, but people are playing it, too. At least according to the Nintendo Channel, which filters off data from pretty much every Wii connected to the internet, which i would lend a bit more credence to than Nielsen with their relatively tiny sample groups
Certainly some people are buying it for the fad, but more than enough Wii owners are actually using it, at least to justify it's current dominion over the console market
Reply
Certainly some people are buying it for the fad, but more than enough Wii owners are actually using it, at least to justify it's current dominion over the console market
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 7:24PM xxxsam said
Hah. I was thinking about coming in here to post - hey, 20 out of 30 titles, does this mean that finally people are going to stop talking bullshit about Wii owners not buying games?
Apparently not.
I haven't bought a retail game in a while... WiiWare on the other hand... (hm, I need to check metacritic for Deadly Creatures, maybe that's worth getting).
Reply
Apparently not.
I haven't bought a retail game in a while... WiiWare on the other hand... (hm, I need to check metacritic for Deadly Creatures, maybe that's worth getting).
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 8:40PM samfish said
"I haven't bought a game for mine in over a year. I have no reason to turn it on"
Well then you're missing out, aren't you?
At least do yourself a favor and import Tatsunoko vs Capcom. Don't give me no bullshit about being afraid to brick you're Wii with homebrew, either. If you REALLY haven't turned it on in as long as you claim, it should be no big deal if you break it or not (you won't).
I'm starting to think most of the "My Wii collects dust" posts are from people who don't even own the damn thing.
Reply
Well then you're missing out, aren't you?
At least do yourself a favor and import Tatsunoko vs Capcom. Don't give me no bullshit about being afraid to brick you're Wii with homebrew, either. If you REALLY haven't turned it on in as long as you claim, it should be no big deal if you break it or not (you won't).
I'm starting to think most of the "My Wii collects dust" posts are from people who don't even own the damn thing.
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 6:13PM (Unverified) said
Ok, so it's you guys who's keeping the Wii momentum moving. Do you guys really want lackluster graphics and a ton of shovelware? Just for a controller that only lets you swing it wildly for use as a controller? Nintendo really got you people. They got me too. Shame on us all.
I hope Sony and Microsoft don't go this route next gen, it will be a nightmare if they do. They are finally getting to the technology that can make great and sophisticated games like Heavy Rain and Fallout 3. I just hope they don't go retro like Nintendo :(
Reply
I hope Sony and Microsoft don't go this route next gen, it will be a nightmare if they do. They are finally getting to the technology that can make great and sophisticated games like Heavy Rain and Fallout 3. I just hope they don't go retro like Nintendo :(
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 12:49PM Dante G said
"I doubt people are buying the Wii version for most of those games."
Most people only have a wii, so it's not like they have a choice. I think most people only get 1 console per gen. That doesn't mean they're not hardcore players, that just means they are more selective and think of buying a console as a serious investment.
Reply
Most people only have a wii, so it's not like they have a choice. I think most people only get 1 console per gen. That doesn't mean they're not hardcore players, that just means they are more selective and think of buying a console as a serious investment.
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 1:57PM Cheezeman3000 said
I recently purchased a used first-run 60gb Ps3 on e-bay for the same price as a new one because of the backwards-compatability. I was holding out for a while, seeing if Sony would decide to put it back in eventually, but eventually just gave up. If Sony still had backwards-compatability in their newer systems, I would've bought a new one instead of a used one. And I'm not the only one in that boat.
Reply
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 2:14PM tracer bullet said
For those who don't understand Nintendo Numbers, try reading "Blue Ocean Strategy", by W. Chan Kin.
What is interesting is that now, the Wii is starting to get to Chan Kin's "Red Sea". Take a look around the Internet, and lots of so-called "serious gamers" are starting to consider the little white machine. AS more interesting titles are launched, the more this phenomena will improve.
In short, game, set, match, Wii.
Reply
What is interesting is that now, the Wii is starting to get to Chan Kin's "Red Sea". Take a look around the Internet, and lots of so-called "serious gamers" are starting to consider the little white machine. AS more interesting titles are launched, the more this phenomena will improve.
In short, game, set, match, Wii.
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 3:14PM (Unverified) said
I think I can get past the fact that Wii is a low performing, horribly overpriced product that sells purely on marketing and gimmicks rather than quality. While the hardware does limit games somewhat, games like Mario Kart Wii are still a lot of fun, and I enjoy them. However, I don't think anyone should be happy about horribly shitty titles like Wii Play selling as well as they are. That ONLY hurts the video game industry and thus only hurts us gamers.
Reply
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 3:31PM guttertalk said
All consoles rely on marketing. And when it comes to quality, you only have to look at the 360 for poor quality. Three years into its life, Microsoft has *finally* released a design that doesn't predictably overheat and fail. How about $90 for a freaking wireless network accessory?
Reply
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 4:56PM Mr Khan said
If the bad economy makes your money dry up (somewhat likely, depending on how you are employed), then you can start worrying about what the sales of Wii Play will do to you as a gamer
Obviously if you have no money, no one will cater to you, but so long as you do, someone will. We are in the age where every taste gets accomodated at this point, and people worry about hardcore games going away
Reply
Obviously if you have no money, no one will cater to you, but so long as you do, someone will. We are in the age where every taste gets accomodated at this point, and people worry about hardcore games going away
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 5:07PM (Unverified) said
Well with 360 and PS3 you get what you pay for. They're high performing, but built for cheaper than they might be. At least for the first few years, MS sold 360s at a loss. If they built them all with the highest quality components, the system would have launched at over $500, I mean they cost MS $600 to build as they were at launch anyways.
If any component in Wii is expensive, it's because it uses components so out of date, that manufacturers only make those parts for Wii, so it wastes efficiency. There isn't many companies purchasing 729MHz Power PC processors anymore.
I think there's a real risk of reduced hardcore games as time goes on. If the casual market becomes truly massive, it becomes much more efficient to target those people than the 'hardcore' market. I don't think we're at that point yet, Wii only manages to sell somewhat more than 360 and PS3 combined worldwide, and PC helps a little to the PS3/360/PC game platform as well. Imagine if Wii (or a future casual system) was outselling 360 by 10 times though? It'd be a completely different matter.
Reply
If any component in Wii is expensive, it's because it uses components so out of date, that manufacturers only make those parts for Wii, so it wastes efficiency. There isn't many companies purchasing 729MHz Power PC processors anymore.
I think there's a real risk of reduced hardcore games as time goes on. If the casual market becomes truly massive, it becomes much more efficient to target those people than the 'hardcore' market. I don't think we're at that point yet, Wii only manages to sell somewhat more than 360 and PS3 combined worldwide, and PC helps a little to the PS3/360/PC game platform as well. Imagine if Wii (or a future casual system) was outselling 360 by 10 times though? It'd be a completely different matter.
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 6:04PM erh said
@Nein_Sporg "If any component in Wii is expensive, it's because it uses components so out of date"
The Wii's CPU and GPU were brand new designs, manufactured using the exact same 90nm technology as the 360 and PS3 used at launch, not the old 180nm technology found in the GameCube and original Xbox.
"...that manufacturers only make those parts for Wii, so it wastes efficiency. There isn't many companies purchasing 729MHz Power PC processors anymore."
The 360's CPU and GPU are also manufactured exclusively for that system, so there are no other companies purchasing either systems' CPUs.
Reply
The Wii's CPU and GPU were brand new designs, manufactured using the exact same 90nm technology as the 360 and PS3 used at launch, not the old 180nm technology found in the GameCube and original Xbox.
"...that manufacturers only make those parts for Wii, so it wastes efficiency. There isn't many companies purchasing 729MHz Power PC processors anymore."
The 360's CPU and GPU are also manufactured exclusively for that system, so there are no other companies purchasing either systems' CPUs.
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 7:28PM xxxsam said
Um. Wii Play's not a 'horribly shitty' game. It's a second controller with a not particularly good but cheap-enough-you-might-as-well-get-it minigame collection stuck on. Why wouldn't people get it? That doesn't say anything about the doom times of humanity or whatever. You should worry more when people are buying shitty games for $30+...
If Sony or Microsoft came up with a decent hook for selling a new controller for a few dollars extra with a game, that'd be tearing up the charts too. (And yes, I think it's pretty doubtful that Play should be listed on the charts at all, but on the other hand, it's easy to just ignore it.)
Reply
If Sony or Microsoft came up with a decent hook for selling a new controller for a few dollars extra with a game, that'd be tearing up the charts too. (And yes, I think it's pretty doubtful that Play should be listed on the charts at all, but on the other hand, it's easy to just ignore it.)
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 4:05PM gatorboi352 said
"I think I can get past the fact that Wii is a low performing, horribly overpriced product that sells purely on marketing and gimmicks rather than quality."
Yeah you definitely sound like you're getting past that....
Reply
Yeah you definitely sound like you're getting past that....
Posted: Feb 13th 2009 6:07PM (Unverified) said
Nintendo's continued success with the Wii should make all 360 and PS3 owners worried. If Microsoft and Sony decide to drop out of the videogame business and Nintendo sticks to catering to the huge amount of casual gamers we'd be stuck playing games like Wii Fit and Wii Play.
Unfortunately there's nothing we can do about it except continuing to support the 360 and the PS3 and hoping Microsoft and sony doesn't drop out.
Reply
Unfortunately there's nothing we can do about it except continuing to support the 360 and the PS3 and hoping Microsoft and sony doesn't drop out.
Posted: Feb 16th 2009 12:57AM (Unverified) said
Hardcore people, calm down. Our games will always be around. Maybe not in HD, but that is not Nintendo's fault. HD is bankrupting our best developers. They will have to shift their assets to Wii. It's the only way they will survive. Trust me, Nintendo will not make our type of hardcore games. But, someone else will. If they can make some money. And they will on Wii. 20 of the top 30 games last month were on Nintendo platforms. That should tell you something. Better warm up your Wii for MadWorld and the Conduit. While you are at it, try Deadly Creatures. In the dark. With your girlfriend/wife watching. Awesome... She'll be scared, you'll be gaming, afterwards, you can console her....
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 101 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments










