Make no Bones about it, folks -- memorable faces from the Star Trek universe won't be making an appearance in Cryptic's upcoming final frontier MMO, Star Trek Online. In a recent interview with MTV Multiplayer, STO executive producer Craig Zinkievich explained that the game takes place "in the future where the majority of the known characters have passed on." Except for the ones that are robots, or holograms, or ghosts. Or all three!
Don't think that Cryptic's issued themselves a license to kill canon -- Zinkievich (a shoe-in for Joystiq's Surname of the Year award) claims that the STO dev team has been in talks with folks who've been involved in the franchise to make sure they don't cut any corners, or crush any anticipation-filled Trekkie hearts. We've submitted our own terrifyingly erotic fan fiction to their think tank -- hopefully, it'll make it into the final product.
Reader Comments (47)
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 11:54AM (Unverified) said
What are you talking about, this is Shatner man, he is immortal!
The only man that could make gay marriage look very manly.
The only man able to tame the falcon of truth!
Reply
The only man that could make gay marriage look very manly.
The only man able to tame the falcon of truth!
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 4:34PM The Blank Mage Returns said
Didn't Janeway self-destruct? Like, more than once?
Reply
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 11:34PM (Unverified) said
given they are following the books somewhat, Janeway is dead as is a few other characters after a massive borg attack that made the Dominion War look like a dodgeball game.
Reply
Posted: Feb 15th 2009 12:07PM Blaquebeird said
Janeway should have been left out. In fact, Voyager never should have been made. Every time there's a rerun, Gene Roddenberry generates high torque.
Reply
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 11:09AM dr steve brule said
hey you could make the dr. from voyager a character, since he's a hologram and all.
oh and happy valentine's day joystiq
Reply
oh and happy valentine's day joystiq
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 8:01PM Snowblind said
Bits of Voyager were done well, I really liked a lot of the characters.. but eventually the writting got very lazy, resorting to time travel and Borg episodes in an attempt to draw in the ratings, to the point were the Borg became a complete joke, and the show was more or less renamed "Star Trek: Seven of Nine".
Reply
Posted: Feb 15th 2009 12:09PM Blaquebeird said
You know why Voyager sucks, right? It's because Gene is dead, and his wife took over. It happened halfway through TNG, and when it did, the show became less science fiction and more like a romance novel in space.
Reply
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 11:28AM ProtagonistZero said
Mythic is not making Star Trek Online. Its Cryptic studios. Thats an error with the article. Thanks.
Reply
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 11:41AM Vordus said
Oh yeah, you say that, but they managed to shoehorn nearly every character from TOS into TNG and it's movies. Bones was still alive for the first episode, Scotty got himself stuck in a warp relay thingamajig, Kirk got stuck in a sort of paradise-like rift with Picard and Malcolm MacDowell, and Spock turned up constantly as an ambassador.
Just because everyone from the franchise should be dead doesn't mean that they all will be.
Reply
Just because everyone from the franchise should be dead doesn't mean that they all will be.
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 4:38PM The Blank Mage Returns said
Are you kidding? The entirety of Star Trek is a game that Q plays when he's bored.
Reply
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 12:18PM dr steve brule said
hey that's my avatar! well atleast half the time when it decides to work. right now you're probably going to see graham wellington
Reply
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 12:24PM Bowser Rogozhin said
So did I, so I didn't bother commenting.
Oh wait...
Reply
Oh wait...
Posted: Feb 15th 2009 3:20PM (Unverified) said
Wesley went off to become an immortal Nth dimensional space hippie with Traveller. Now, he could still be alive in the STO universe, but I prefer to think that about 10 minutes of Wesley's crap, Traveller dropped him off on some moon somewhere to die a horrible death.
And yes, I did see Wesley in Nemesis. But Nemesis got a lot of things wrong. Like space dune buggies. So Nemesis doesn't count.
Reply
And yes, I did see Wesley in Nemesis. But Nemesis got a lot of things wrong. Like space dune buggies. So Nemesis doesn't count.
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 12:51PM dr steve brule said
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 4:40PM The Blank Mage Returns said
I remember that guy! As soon as I thought "Hey, some new guy is in Data's seat", that happens.
Reply
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 1:03PM Bridget said
I'd hate to have to write for Star Trek. Having to deal with some 40 years of canon seems like it would be very confining, particularly when you have an especially rabid fan base that's willing to call you out on any tiny inconsistency, no matter how insignificant.
Reply
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 2:18PM (Unverified) said
Nah, it's not that bad-Trekkies are like console gamers, you can shit on them all you like and they still line up to give you their money while they whine about it. Trek has never been good about continuity or originality, they won't start here.
Reply
Posted: Feb 15th 2009 3:28PM (Unverified) said
It's not really that confining, there are 4 main species, a couple of governments, and infinite space. It's much harder to write about the real world than it would be to write about Star Trek, I would imagine.
The problem is that Rick Berman and Ira Behr were retarded and thought it would be cool to write Star Trek episodes about Dinosaurs and Marie Curie because they never really wanted to work on a sci-fi tv show in the first place.
Reply
The problem is that Rick Berman and Ira Behr were retarded and thought it would be cool to write Star Trek episodes about Dinosaurs and Marie Curie because they never really wanted to work on a sci-fi tv show in the first place.
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 4:07PM (Unverified) said
Posted: Feb 14th 2009 4:27PM RobAccomando said
Someone told me that in one of the Star Trek books, Kirk ends of living at the end of Generations.
I guess they're just going by what happened in the films?
Reply
I guess they're just going by what happened in the films?
Posted: Feb 15th 2009 3:24PM (Unverified) said
William Shatner actually wrote that book, too.
I have never read it (sci-fi novels based on film and television series are just fan fics that cost 7$), but I recall from the back of the book that the plot involved Kirk's grave being desecrated by a passing Romulan or Vulcan ship because he wasn't really dead. Picard apparently being a really terrible doctor and never bothering to check his pulse before burying him at the end of Generations.
Reply
I have never read it (sci-fi novels based on film and television series are just fan fics that cost 7$), but I recall from the back of the book that the plot involved Kirk's grave being desecrated by a passing Romulan or Vulcan ship because he wasn't really dead. Picard apparently being a really terrible doctor and never bothering to check his pulse before burying him at the end of Generations.
Posted: Feb 15th 2009 2:52AM (Unverified) said
Yeah, cos they NEVER travel in time in the Star Trek mythos...
Or introduce techy deus-ex-machina to allow whatever corssovers they feel like.
Reply
Or introduce techy deus-ex-machina to allow whatever corssovers they feel like.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments









