| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (35)

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 4:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
hmmmmmmm

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 7:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Seriously, why post this shit?

Are you retarded?

Let's all post meaningless drivel


oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhh

ok next?
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 8:48AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
whats wrong with what he said??
Reply

Posted: Feb 26th 2009 10:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because it's as annoying as reading 15 "FIRST!!!!" posts.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 4:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have high hopes for W7.

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 9:15AM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that makes two of us. im sure it will have it's problems at launch, but i just hope it wont be how Vista was. i know ive personally had some really hard times trying to do stuff in Vista that was simple in XP. i know they tried to make it easier, but they didn't. i will run 7 in my next PC that i'll buy sometime over the course of the year.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 10:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn, that's exactly where I am right now! I'm planning on building a new computer within the year I hope and I'll put W7 on that. Computer parts are getting quite cheap. So that's nice.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 12:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Got a new machine and am beta'ing Windows 7. It's actually pretty damn nice. I probably will actually buy it when it launches.

http://www.pcauthority.com.au/Tools/Print.aspx?CIID=137607

PC Authority's 30 Best Features of W7. Worth checking out if all you know of W7 is blog posts and news articles.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 4:36AM BritC said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't quite understand why game companies complain about used-game sales. It's just something that game companies, like all businesses, have to deal with so it's not worth spending time worrying about it. (I'm sure the car companies would like it if there were no used-car sales, as well.) Besides, it seems that the game industry is still growing - maybe I could understand the pessimism of used game sales if it was shrinking. The thing about used-game sales is this: if 100,000 people want to play your game this week, then there has to be 100,000 copies sold. This means used game sales cannot cut too deeply into the industry.

(I should add that I'm not just a gamer stating his opinion, but I'm a game developer/owner as well - empiresofsteel.com)

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 5:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's awesome that you make games. I checked your site out. Reminds me of Age of Booty but that might be because I just played that game. It's quite fun too
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 5:04AM Punkrawk Bbob said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So you're saying that game companies shouldn't complain about piracy either?

Considering both have the same end effect from the developers stand point (no gain from the person playing it), are you really saying that used game sales shouldn't matter? Don't you think there is some relation between the fact that over the last generation that used sales are rocketing (Gstop is reporting like 2.2 billion in profits, where 80% of it was from used game sales), while sequels become more prevalent and creativity is being put wayside for Super_awesome_FPS_031 of the season?

Strange. Let's all pirate everything and buy it used. We'll see how long the industry lasts then.

Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 5:52AM Alphathon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jeepers Creepers 712: While it may not appear that way on the surface, the used game industry is far better for developers than piracy.

First in order for a game to be bought used, someone else must have bought that particular copy already in order to sell it used. With piracy however, only one copy must be bought (or stolen I suppose) before thousands of people can download it. Put simply, if you buy a used game, while you are not directly helping the industry, you are not taking anything away from it either.

Second, as already mentioned many people sell their games in order to buy new ones (which is enhanced by stores giving more store credit than cash for games)
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 6:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Alphathon: On the other hand, you could say a pirate was never going to buy the game anyway, so no loss or gain. But a Used sale could have easily been a New sale.

I hate arguments like this, because there's never any definitive answer, but at the end of the day, everyone's probably right in some way.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 7:08AM HydrophobicFish PSN ID Hydrophob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I mean no offense, but the fact that you're a game developer, or at least, the particulars of it don't give you a hugely unique perspective on it.

The website you linked, at least, was digital distribution to sell the game (With yeah, the possibility of shipping a CD later).
You know, I have plenty of respect for you, being a game developer, and you have a better stake in the industry than I do, but your company is no Epic Games, or Konami, or Bungee, who make their lifeblood off of brick and mortar. You kinda forgo that.

However, you are right as well about the resale industry being existent in most other aspects of life. Here's on difference between the game industry and others; developers are more often than not, legally considered "professionals" which exempts them LEGALLY from being paid overtime. The game industry may be booming (except for lately, but that's besides the point) but the rank-and-file employee over at game company X still doesn't make that much money. Unless of course you're a Cliffy B, Peter Molineux, Hideo Kojima, Will Wright, or some other big wig in the game bizz.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 11:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Brit-
They're not complaining because gamers sell games or buy used games for cheap, they have a problem with places like gamestop because where a gamer would normally sell 5 recent games on amazon or ebay then buy a couple of new ones if you "trade in" 5 games at gamestop you barely have enough to buy one recent game, not to mention the fact that you'll be buying that recent game used unless you preordered it.

That's what we call a racket, and they're praying on gamers; the publishers are just bystanders really. I'm just surprised so many people shop there when you can get better prices anywhere else.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 5:02PM BritC said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Re: Jeepers Creepers 712
Yeah, I do worry about piracy and whether the percentage of pirates increases over time. I don't see piracy in the same light as used games. I'm okay with reselling used games because there's a variety of things about used games that limits it's ability to damage the industry.

For example, I mentioned that if 100,000 want to play your game within a given week, then there has to be at least 100,000 copies out-there (i.e. sold). Piracy is a different game because it allows 100,000 people to play the game, but the total sales could potentially be much-much smaller than that. Theoretically, piracy could allow for as few as one copy sold (or zero copies in the case of leaks). So, while used games can diminish profits, it's potential to damage the industry is limited by a variety of factors. (For whatever reason, I never buy used games, and never sell my old games, either.) I also think stopping used-game sales pushes too much against user's rights. And the "right of first sale" prevents companies from stopping sales of used products anyway. The book companies tried to do this a hundred years ago because they realized that sales of used books hurt sales of new books.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 5:00AM GenBanks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I buy most games on Steam, so I can't resell anything unfortunately. I sort of wish Steam would allow you to transfer game licenses between accounts, even though I know that's unlikely to happen.

With console games meanwhile, I'm constantly either renting games or reselling ones I'm not playing anymore (or that have subsequently been released for PC).

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 5:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm the same. I rent almost all of my games, other than XBLA games and PC games. It's far too expensive to constantly be purchasing new games, at least for myself it is.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 5:18AM falcomadol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Relatively in this case means that on the exact same hardware, Windows 7 runs faster than Vista. Which I can attest to.

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 5:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's awesome. I didn't want to use to Beta. How is the rest of the OS? Do you like it more than XP and Vista?
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 6:08AM Alphathon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well thats good news. My computer is currently capable of running Crysis at 1920x1200 with all the settings at high or very high (I thing thats wht they're called...in the original Crysis anyway - it's different in Crysis Warhead) with a relativelly good framerate on Vista, so it'll be nice to see how the preformance is on Win 7.

Better performance is better...also obvious comment is obvious* and longcat is loooooooong :)

*reffering to mine not anyone elses just so you know
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 6:25AM DrXym said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The way I see it is if the industry wants to diminish sales of used games, they have a few choices:

a) Sell games online for less than they cost in stores. They still make more money because there is no physical cost of shipping, returns or stocking to worry about. And games can't be resold, full stop.
b) Drop the price of games faster once they've been on sale for a while so that the price of used games doesn't look so attractive.
c) Start requiring registration in all games, console or otherwise and force Gamestop and other retailers to purchase refresh codes to resell the game.
d) Drop the price of games in general.
e) Increase the value of ownership by offering new levels, patches, events so that people are less inclined to grow bored of the game and sell it.

Frankly I rarely buy used games, not on principal but because the prices are a scam. Usually I can purchase a game brand new for pretty much close to the price that somebody like Gamestop or EB would have me pay for used. The industry should be thankful that Gamestop / EB et al are such greedy SOBs otherwise the issue would be much more serious.

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 11:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Start requiring registration in all games, console or otherwise and force Gamestop and other retailers to purchase refresh codes to resell the game"

Huh? Please explain this a bit further. Do you mean the retailer has to register each copy or the user has to use a key to play a game on a console?

Because if you mean the latter i'd rather just use my PC if i'm going to have to enter a key in order to play a game.


Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2009 5:48AM DrXym said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What I'm saying is Gamestop get away with selling console games because there is nothing in the game that prevents it being reused. The disk is not bound to a machine, so there is nothing to stop them selling it again. They *don't* sell PC games because these days most premium games have a serial code. 10 years ago it was entirely different.

Is it impractical to enter a code on a console?

Depends on how you do it. For example, if COD4, Halo 3 or Killzone 2 could have bundled a code that let people download a free multiplayer map pack from PSN/XBL. Virtually everyone who played online would definitely use the code since it's free. The vendor could also ensure that contention for non-map pack servers motivates people to download it.

That alone would seriously stifle second hand sales since you'd lose out on the map pack. If you still bought the game second hand, you'd have to pay $5 or whatever to download the map pack on your own dime. Alternatively the producer might sell the map pack refresh codes wholesale to Gamestop for a couple of bucks and GS could be involved in selling them with the second hand game. Either way producers would claw back some money from resales which they never would have before.

It would be a very simple and easy to do. It's so simple I'm surprised it hasn't happened already.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 7:25AM AwesomeTown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He's dead on. The majority of games I buy used are my second teir wants. Basically, games that I wanted to play, but those I wouldn't want to spend full price or close to full price on.

And, hell, maybe I would like one of those games enough to buy a sequel brand new.

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 7:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Being able to sell used games increases the liquidity of games themselves. People who buy games new will be less insecure about buying them because they know they can ressell them later for a nice fraction of the price (if its a new release). They also can sell their old games in order to buy new ones.

People buying old games are able to test many games, and may in the future buy a sequel to a game he likes brand new.

So an used game market is important to the new game market.

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 7:58AM SnapperDragon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, I think DLC is used to simply charge more for a game.

How about this model: sell the game for the normal price, but then offer regular DLC for free. That way, over time, the original game has more value and will tend to be kept by the original purchasers. It keeps the game viable over the long haul and will tend to make people want to buy it that did not originally.

The free mods for BF1942 (forgotten hope, desert combat) kept sales of the original game alive for quite some time.

But oh well, greed...

Posted: Mar 4th 2009 1:22AM kmcroc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if i can lessen the out of pocket expense by trading in some games for store credit then am all for it , plus by keeping a game after you beaten it does not guarantee you that gaming house will releases any DLC for it anytime soon . so why hold on to it . (just my thoughts on the matter )

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 9:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
" upcoming OS will be "great for games."

Yes it will, but i want FORZA MOTORSPORTS, HALO3, FABLE 2, etc on PC and at the same time as to the vacuum cleaner (360).

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 8:49AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Windows 7 is the truth. and it can only get better

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 9:25AM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i generally dont like buying used games or trading in my games since in most cases, i could get it cheaper or sell it for more money elsewhere (usually eBay). but it is nice to have the option. im actually about to trade in some games at GameCrazy today to help pay for Killzone 2. the bad economy has finally started effecting me and i just can't afford to buy a $60 game at the drop of hat right now. i would have sold them on eBay but the time is short now and i cant really sell them as a lot since they are for about 5 different consoles. luckily for me, i can trade in some games that i never really played or liked and help pay for a game i really want.

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 11:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would agree that gamers usually sell old games to go towards new games/systems or whatever. How often does someone come into game stop and get cash instead of store credit?

The game dev's/publishers who are upset about this are just mad they aren't getting a cut of the profits, but if someone trades in madden 08 towards the purchase of madden 09... how are they really being hurt? (I know that's a bad example, they give like .45 cents for an old copy of madden).

I guess Ford, Toyota, Nissan, Honda, BMW, Sony, Panasonic, Dell, HP, Glock, Smith & Wesson, Motorola, RIM, HTC, Visio and RCA (just to name a few) should be speaking out against used car dealerships, Ebay, Pawn Shops, Gun Shops or whoever else sells used goods. The games industries argument against Game Stop is ridiculous, if people choose to take a loss on selling their games and are putting the money right back into the industry, what's the f'ing problem?

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 3:30PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
DRM and Used Games don't mix. Stop talking out both ends of your a$$, bub.

Posted: Mar 1st 2009 1:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Three observations...

#1: I've seen a woman so hard up for cash that she was willing to accept whatever trade-in values she was given at GameStop, even knowing that she would be getting less than she would with store credit.
#2: I got into the Ace Combat series through the 6 demo... but before giving that game a chance I went through 04, 5, and Zero... used.
#3: At least at my local EB Games, all used Gears of Wars 2 display boxes are to be labeled with a "Does not contain the Flashback Map Pack" sticker.

Posted: Feb 24th 2009 11:56PM captcarl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have hopes that Windows 7 will make Vista look like Windows Millennium Edition. I'm sure I'm not the only one who remembers that atrocious piece of trash.

I ran the Win7 beta fine within a virtual machine, but when I installed it fresh on my machine (QX6700, nForce 680i, GTX260), I got bluescreens every few minutes. Apparently it was a problem with the TCP/IP stacks, so I went back to Vista. My biggest problem with Vista is its compatibility with many games. I have issues with so many games I'm ready to revert to XP or XP x64 until Windows 7 drops.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW