In one of the most well-reasoned and least sensationalized articles on government regulation of violent games we've ever seen out of the mainstream press, the Los Angeles Times recently published an editorial
pointing out the unnecessary and unconstitutional nature of a recently rebuked California bill
which mandated "18+" warning labels be applied to M-rated games, and enforced strict $1,000 penalties
for retailers who sold such titles to minors.
The editorial denotes the flawed logic which went into the bipartisan regulation, and aptly places the onus for keeping adult-centric titles out of youngsters' hands on their parental units, who "don't need permission from a legislator or judge to keep an eye on what their children are doing." We can't help but agree -- besides, with the Golden State currently staring down the barrel of a $42 billion deficit
, we're not convinced that the taxpayers of California can afford to keep making such charitable donations to the ESA