| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (103)

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:32PM Hinchy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh god, the picture made me laugh my ass off. Good job.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:32PM The Kong said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Not buying, im sorry vote me down but it just strays too far from its roots. And the fact that CAPCOM is making online versus mode DLC that you have to pay for is utterly ridiculous. No way i will pay extra for modes that should have shipped with the game, and were already made.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"pay extra for modes that should have shipped with the game, and were already made."

I believe you meant "pay for modes that should never, ever exist on God's green earth"
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:04PM latin trident said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
If anybody wins the joyswag from joystiq or xbox.joystiq, they should buy the DLC. I know I would! You would have the ultimate bragging rights, especially at Gamestop. "I bought RE5 for 400 MS points!" Heehee (deep voice)
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:38PM NightElve said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I agree with you.

RE2 was the best, RE3 & CV were great. I felt that with RE4 they were trying something different and it was ok, but now with RE5 I just feel I'm playing a GoW wanna be.

That makes me a sad panda :( .... I want a Resident Evil not an Action Game.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 9:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I agree with moptimus.

Resident Evil with Co-op = Win

Resident Evil with Versus online mode..Wait what? They should have copied Left 4 Dead not Gears of war.

I guess I'll buy it yeah I don't feel like it but I'm a sucker for CE but I'll play it offline to avoid the achievement update.If I reach a 100% I don't want that to get nulified for the crappy MP download.


Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Capcom turning Resident Evil,a horror staple of the PS1,into the next Gears of War really put a bad taste in my mouth. I think 4 will be the last I play in the series.

GG Capcom.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
A horror staple? When was the last time you've played the original PS1 game?
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dunno moptimus, those controls were pretty scary.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
To be honest, those graphics left me scarred for life

not to mention this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtTfptkUgj0&feature=related
Reply

Posted: Mar 14th 2009 10:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
are we saying that RE1 didn't have amazing graphics when it launched? I remember it looking pretty stunning at the time...

and being at least a little bit spooky in places. the little i've played of RE5 is more like a middle east action wargame.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:34PM Marius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
G4 gave it a 60 after expressing all their sad love for RE4. wow definitely not buying.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 10:55PM agemyth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't fall for the bullshit score translation. 60/100 does not equal 3/5 stars. Just like a B does not equal anything out of 100.

I know what RE5 is already. I know exactly what I'm getting into when I buy the game tomorrow.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:34PM Railgun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow at G4TV.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 8:23PM timstew said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
G4TV uses a 5 star point system. The 3/5 is a reasonable score.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:39PM sinai said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
can someone fill me in on when G4 became a legit games reviewer? but then again, i think 1ups reviews are ass too.

waiting to hear from giant bomb!
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:08PM MarkezJM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think 1up reviews are less reliable than the G4/xplay ones. 1up reviews seem to vary wildly dependent upon who is reviewing them. There seems to be *some* semblance of consistency in the G4 ones, plus it's one more (somewhat) valid opinion I can go off to see if I want to pick up the game or not.

I do enjoy Sesslar's Soapbox quite a bit.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:14PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Shouldn't reviews vary depending on who reviews them? I mean, the whole point of a review is focused on one's own opinion. I mean, Metacritic heavily recommends Gears of War over Sonic and the Secret Rings, but i know which one i enjoy, and which one i don't

Multiple reviewers per game (like joystiq's little roundtable earlier, or Famitsu's general method) could sort that out
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:19PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nah, I agree by and large, Khan. BUT, I find 1up's to be horribly and utterly inconsistent. While subjectivity is great and appropriate and all, that doesn't mean there should be a complete vacuum of objectivity, which I feel is the case with 1up. There's no uniformity, no consistency, and seemingly no standards for what different staffers do on their reviews. I did initially really like the letter grading. When I was more of an avid reader of theirs I noticed that they do have multiple reviews about half the time. Half the time, in 1up's case, really doesn't cut it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:22PM Levi Partridge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha, someone in the comments pointed out that Blood in the Sand scored higher on G4 than RE5.

Depending on the reviewer, 1up is my most reliable review source. James Mielke and Jeremy Parish have never led me wrong. I miss Andrew Fitch the most from the UGO merger because I found him to be the most trustworthy RPG reviewer ever!
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:30PM Levi Partridge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sorry, I meant JRPG reviewer, not just RPG.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:37PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't the milkman get shitcanned with the recent layoffs?

Anyway, Sessler is a reputable source, but their 5 star ratings system is too blunt. They gave the game a 3 out of 5, which absolutely does not equate to a 60/100, since their review system was never designed for that. Saying a 3 out of 5 is a 60/100 may work out in terms of the math, but it isn't even nearly accurate. It would be nice if there were some standardization in terms of how games are reviewed, but since there isn't, we'll have to put up with people going nuts over a 60/100 that is really 3 stars out of 5 and nothing more. A scoring system where the conversion to metacritic can only be 20/100 (1 star), 40/100 (2 star), 60/100 (3 star), 80/100 (4 star), or 100/100 (5 star) is garbage, and horribly outdated (yes, I know it isn't their fault that Metacritic butchers their scores).

I think the general wisdom at this point of an 85/100 is a bit more in line with how I feel about the game. I'm not blown away, and I don't think I like the game as much as I liked RE4, but it isn't bad by any means (control scheme debate withheld). In a season where there aren't a lot of big releases, it is much easier to swallow the purchase.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 8:17PM Levi Partridge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BanannaBoat: Milky is back and better than ever. He wrote an epic 2 part blog that chronicled his history with EGM, GMR and 1up. Go and find it when you have time. It actually got me to tear up a little.

I just now finished watching Sessler's Soap Box, and I liked that a lot more than his video review. I'll read his full review later (cue the, "I'm not gonna read ahl dat," Governor Schwarzenegger pic).
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:46PM Gamer X said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok... some of you don't want to buy for your own personal reasons... that's ligit. But don't listen to someone's review and say "I'm not buying." There are a lot of games I've liked that recieved mediocre reviews. It's someones opinion. I'm a little disappointed that the tension in the game will be gone due to having a partner (safety net)... but it should be a fun action game in any case. I'm buying for sure. What else is coming out in the dry spring and summer months???
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:47PM Marius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
sorry not all of us have $60 bucks to just throw away, that why there is reviews to tell us if its worth the money
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well personally, I'm buying guitar hero metallica thanks to RE 5's horrible demo.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:59PM Gamer X said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, so it gets one mediocre review out of 4 and that's the one you're going with? Nice try at your logic! How bout your rent it, borrow it, or read up on it more and make an objective opinion yourself before you state...

"G4 gave it a 60 after expressing all their sad love for RE4. wow definitely not buying."

RE games don't generally have a history of being horrible. Only shortcomings to someone's expectations.

Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It doesn't make much sense to me either that people throw their hands up and say yes/no to a game after a review. Yeah, not all of us have 60 bucks to throw around. The kicker is... demo's are FREE, and they *gasp* let you play the game for yourself without renting/buying. I know, crazy world, but yes you can now decide things for yourself.

Try the demo and if it's bad, don't buy. Simple stuff.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:04PM Marius said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
i tried the demo, and for once i agree with Sessler, he hits all the right points
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
god you all are soo biased why do you hate the PS3? Im sure if RE5 was a 360 exclusive you'd all be buying 20 copies of it. Thats the only logical explanation I can come up with because nobody would ever have an opinion that's different than mine. And if they did, they certainly wouldn't be so vocal about it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:12PM Levi Partridge said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If people don't want to buy it, they shouldn't buy it. It's not like there will never be another RE game if copies of RE5 don't sell into the millions. Maybe Capcom will try figure out why RE5 didn't work and fix the series for the better. If you love it, great! I love many games that people don't give a shit about, and I'm no less happier.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:13PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dude, JD, we're not selecting a presidential cabinet here, it's just a friggin videogame, jesus. We don't have to put every videogame through a thorough vetting process.

Reviews are enough for people to read and then figure out on their own whether they want to buy it or not.

"Reading up on it" = reviews
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:14PM MarkezJM said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
We'z gonna minus you back to the days of RE2 sucka, VOTE DOWN MOAR PLZ
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:18PM Roto13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Try the demo and if it's bad, don't buy. Simple stuff."

It IS bad, but sometimes good games have bad demos so reviews still have their place.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 8:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guitar Hero Metallica!
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 9:12PM Foetoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"What else is coming out in the dry spring and summer months???"

2009 GOTY?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXoN6kCC7ps&fmt=18
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:52PM merobb said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, Adam Sessler ripped RE5 a new one.
Reply

Posted: Mar 15th 2009 4:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Heh, I know. I was watching that and laughing. So owned.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 6:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i was rent games i want to play first, then if i like them i buy it, i already like the demo and my friend and i are having fun, it's all about having fun anyway, right? the game is a lot of fun to play.....
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 9:16PM Nook said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
very true, however I know I have a different kind of fun playing something like a Zelda series type game than a Resident Evil game. It seems this is the problem, your 'goto' IP for thrills and chills gets all action-y on you....what about your fix!?!?

At least we can revisit the older titles, where it was different. Crimson Heads, dear god....
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2009 12:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Even duck hunt. lol. but oh well, everybody is entitled to there own opinion, and 9 times out of 10 i go with mine....lol....by the way, my U.N. is bigboi1904 on the ps3....
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wouldn't trust a review from anyone that thought Assassins Creed was any good. The guys that gave that game a good review did so hoping Jade Raymond would come and thank them presonally.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
did G4_TV say that "Assassin's Creed" is better than "Resident Evil 5"

щ(゚Д゚щ)
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:16PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
cyrillic ASCII?

Delicious.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:32PM Shady3011 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The examples it used are actually not all that great. Mass Effect's combat was pretty lackluster. Bioshock didn't do much different than what System Shock 2 did before it. Assassin's Creed fell short of what it was built up to be. In the end, however, I loved all those games even with their faults.

I understand some use game reviews as metrics to make the game buying decisions. My suggestion is to play what you like. If you like the RE franchise, chances are you'll probably pick up this game.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 7:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why don't you try reading the entire review before saying anything, they said RE5 didn't try anything ambitious like those games, despite those games flaws they were still trying something new
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 9:23PM Railgun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't remember feeling anything new or ambitious when I played through those games Ryuk.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 9:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And when they try to do something new, people will bitch about how it's not RE anymore and it's a whole different game. If they try to stick to it, you'll still have people bitching. So G4TV should just shut the hell up, I saw that channel for a month and it was like willingly getting aids.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2009 10:58PM In A World said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Quattro, regarding innovation and ambition:

Assassin's Creed: Fluid free-running platforming mechanic, unprecidented level of character animation

Mass Effect: Incredibly deep dialog system, great storytelling and voice acting

Bioshock: Bizarre art deco underwater city = unique setting

Resident Evil 5: Ummm.... co-op? Pffft...
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW