| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (103)

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:03PM RKN said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Though its Blu-Ray drive is only 2x, whereas there are already faster and faster Blu-Ray readers coming out. DVD didn't help the PS2 in the long term, especially when its 4x DVD drive became quickly obsolete in speed.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:15PM JuanLovesHorror said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
recently there was a performance test for blu-ray players in the market. ps3 pretty much destroys competition in all categories. The closest one to the ps3 was a 600 dollar model which has 0 storage.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:17PM Da Largest said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"DVD didn't help the PS2 in the long term"

so what you're saying is that being one of the first machines on the market that played dvds at a reasonable price, therefore generating sales and giving the ps2 the install base that justified in many developers minds switching outright to ps2 exclusivity

didn't help the ps2 in the long term?

can i have some of what you're smoking?

Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If PS2 didn't have the DVD drive showcasing movies, the Dreamcast would of been in business still.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:31PM Douche McBaggins said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can I learn your art of stupid? I swear what you just unleashed was a concentrated idiocy and if I could make this in the form of a weapon I could use it to dumb down international countries to slow down their progress and help America climb back to number 1.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:46PM Troy Powers said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gentleman, that was by far the funniest comment I've read in a very long time.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 8:33PM RKN said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Well I AM Cosmo, if you watched The Fairly Oddparents, you'd know how stupid he was. :D
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 9:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*shakes fist*

Damn you PS2 for killing off my Dreamcast Dreams!!

*stubs toe*

RICKLES!!!
Reply

Posted: Mar 19th 2009 12:01AM Bagels said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
RICKLES! MANILOW! RICKLES!
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:04PM Dante G said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'd say let's get out of the economic recession first and then we talk.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:27PM Wickerman22 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, because the PS3 was flying off the shelves before the recession.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:44PM Hyams said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well, before the recession, the PS3 *was* outselling the 360 ... only, then the 360 dropped price, and the economy dying made it impossible for Sony to follow suit with a drop of their own.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Matt, the US has been in a recession for a little over 2 years now, PS3 came out in late 06...
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 7:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If the 360 has another another so-so lineup next year, and the PS3 gets another pricedrop and another killer lineup next year, they have a good chance of closing the gap significantly.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 8:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So the economy hurt Sony, but not Microsoft.

Got it.

If by "the recession" you mean "the fact that it cost hundreds of dollars more to make a PS3 than a 360" then you're absolutely right.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 8:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HitNRun, the recession hurt Sony because people still want to game but will prefer a cheaper price tag to more features.

Lets see, Wii is on top (Cheapest), followed by 360 (Second Cheapest), followed by PS3 (most expensive). It's no coincidence.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 9:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1) The 2+ year recession you're basing this on is a fantasy. Consumer spending has only really been battered in the last year or less, Sony's best so far.

2) What "more features" does the PS3 have? Even the hardest-core Sony fan wouldn't argue that the PS3 had a better games lineup before last year. If you mean Blu-Ray, you're right, except for the part where you think the average consumer would want it enough to pay $200 (now $100) extra for it in a normal economy.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 10:53AM Levi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Me, three friends, and our blu-rays would like to all say hello.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:05PM Jack Tretton said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"He expects Sony's system to pick up steam by '2011 through 2017...'"

This is like saying Louie Anderson could look like Brad Pitt if you give him eight years to try.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 6:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Except that the PS3 looks nicer.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 1:27PM soulseekerUK said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He expects Sony's system to pick up steam by "2011 through 2017, Are they hoping to do this on there existing PS3 hardware... shame if they are.....

well i for one will be on the next generation of console by then, more likely microsoft console...or maybe a something from the big N only if they ramp the hardware spec up... which i dont imagine will be anything more that this gen.

This generation seems like its only got 2-3 years max... then it be a slew of same old same old games. Gamers would be demanding (high scale physics taking the lead-1080p 60-120 FPS - also some new controlling method that works better in 3d enviroments) i think it will be hard to squeeze too much more out of any of this generation of consoles within the next 2-3 years... PS3 may be scalable but not that scalable....
Roll on the NEXT Gen..... thats the trouble being an early adopter.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
He is probably accurate, i am a die-hard sony fanboy this gen. But it seems an impossible hurdle to leap to match up with the 360. I still think the ps3 is the better system and has a very strong line-up, but at this rate it will be a few years before people realize what an amazing system the ps3 is.
Let the Downrating Begin!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it's hard to keep up with a system whose consumers buy 2-5 consoles because of failure rates. I have both and prefer the PS3. I tell all my friends who are not sure which to buy the goods and the bads for each one. I do wish they would drop the price though, so more of my friends could afford them.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:15PM Da Largest said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Both the PS3 and the 360 have their own fair share of problems; I wouldn't consider either 'amazing', as the former went without a steady supply of games for a while (though you'd have to be an idiot not to think that that situation's been rectified... 2008 was pretty great and this year just looks fantastic), and the latter still to this day suffers from hardware issues (and the list o' exclusives this year is looking pretty weak).

Anywhos, the PS3 has been steadily picking up steam for the last year or so. I wouldn't say that it's impossible for it to reach the 360's sales, though I do think it'll take some drastic restructuring as far as marketing goes on Sony's part for that to happen.

Then again, who (other than fanboys and folks inside the industry) cares about sales in the first place?
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:17PM Hyams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Random observation:

Everytime someone finished a post with "Let the downvoting begin!" (or any words to that effect), said post always gets voted up.

Let's experiment.


*prepares to be downvoted*
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:39PM Ordeith said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Anywhos, the PS3 has been steadily picking up steam for the last year or so."

If you define a steady decline of YOY sales as "picking up steam" you might be correct.

As it is, the PS3 is on track to sell less systems in 2009 than it did in 2008. Not a good sign.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:47PM Morisato13 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Your theory is wrong!

*downvoting begins now!*
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 6:37PM Da Largest said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Seriously? Huh, I didn't know that. Then again, my evidence was anecdotal (know a LOT of people who dropped $$$ for a PS3 last year... could have sworn that sales rose too)
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 7:17PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gamers are mostly a bunch of cheap scrubs...that explains why the ps3 is in last place. they're willing to pay less for a console even if it's documented as having any number of significant design problems and unacceptable rates of failure.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 7:32PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Either that, or they just prefer having more fun over having less fun (with regards to what they consider fun).

I would pay 5x as much for my 360 as I would for my PS3, if not more. But that's just me, someone who enjoys online gaming and plays 100x more Gears of War and Mass Effect than every PS3 game I've ever played combined.

Obviously, different tastes for different folks but trying to qualify it as a price thing alone is stupid. The 360 outsold the PS3 more months than vice versa prior to the 360's price cut (and after the PS3's cut down to $400/$500).
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 7:43PM Da Largest said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha, nowhere else would I be downvoted for admitting that I was wrong.

Gotta love the 'stiq.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 7:48PM Morisato said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Wow... now either someone is trying to make me look bad by trying to get me "downvoted"... or is it just a coincidence :P
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 7:50PM Morisato said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I hate how its not letting me use my full name (which is supposed to be Morisato06... but since i put Moris the first time it wont let me use a different name unless i use "new readers" and confirm every comment i make :P)
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 8:20PM Istari Spartan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Downvote me.

I demand you downvote me to hell right now!
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 9:17PM Morisato13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Moris

160+ comments for me. 10+ comments for you. Stop making ME look bad.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 12:18PM rapidix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if the companies are expecting ten year life spans out of their systems, then i'd say this race is still in the beginning. i don't know why either side would say who is finishing second. second because we all know the wii is far enough ahead for the win. but who is really winning with the wii? not gamers. go second place!
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
QQ
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:10PM horngreen said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Blu Ray will be "dirt cheap" in 2017? Like 8 Track was in 1990? Does he mean obsolete? I'm trying to picture still playing on a 360 or the PS3 in 8 years. I don't see it happening.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yep will be playing xbox 720 when ps3 is still playing catchup
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:20PM Pure Black World Tendency said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
but you will likely be doing so in your mobile home.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
IIn 8 years we will probably be playing Xbox 360 games on a better faster PC
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Freeze: 8 years? You can do that already. The 360 has a very short list of exclusives that don't make it to the PC.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:19PM MysticMaven said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What's a PS3?
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:28PM Dirty said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Its kinda like that nintendo those darn kids love these days.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:32PM cuteSAVAGE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's that machine that lets you play Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction over, and over, and over again because it is so damned fun!
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, it's not quite a Playground and it's not quite a Space Station, but man...
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
By that time I think Sony will be focused on the PS4.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:23PM Crusty Magic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why not try a temporary price drop then to see heightened consumer interest?

Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:32PM Crusty Magic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would be one of the first in line if such a thing were to occur.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2009 5:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's bad timing. Wait until unemployment climbs above 10% and people get tax refunds back. The best time for any kind of price drop is the upcoming holiday season. If Uncharted 2 and GoW3 can drop by Christmas, they'll have a win.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW