| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (28)

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
EA 1-0 Capcom.

Getting this day one!

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 6:53PM golobulus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ADRIAAANNN!!!

oh the irony. lol capcom... ea just bitch-slapped you. i don't think this has anything to do with capcom.

has any ever charged for MP before capcom?
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:22AM Dark Archon PSN Archonik XBL Dar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well... Although the game is still visually unappealing to me, I'm gonna pick it up if the reviews are good (especially waiting for the reactions to the Don View) because the gameplay looks fun.

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:23AM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whatever the reason, it's a smart move. Even if they were planning on doing it for free anyway, the timing of this announcement makes EA look even better given Capcom's current situation.

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:24AM AsherR said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sweet. I don't have any interest in this game, but it's nice to see EA becoming more a company that cares about it's customer's and not just their money.

Didn't they also give some free stuff away with Bad Company at some point? Perhaps they are still holding the modes from the code and not charging, just so they look better, but eh, they're still a business.

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:31AM iFester said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They're only announcing this to spite Capcom. Had they charged for the mode and announced it prior to the game's release they knew it might hinder sales. I can just see a Mr. Burns-like CEO getting the news of peoples reactions to the announcement going "excellent". ;)

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:33AM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game looks terrible, but at least they're not breaking off pieces and charging for them...unless they charge for unlocks and in-game money like they did for the first one. Which they probably will.

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 2:23PM Brian Griffin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You mean as bad as the first which scores an overall 8 on gamestats?

I have higher hopes for this game, since, unlike the first, it's free-roaming and it takes place in the 70's which is always a plus :)
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:40AM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bet this has more to do with EA wanting to press the game onto some discs and get it on shelves then it has to do with "giving stuff away." I imagine the mode is pretty much done, just needs a couple tweaks, but EA is going to press the discs and patch it day one like Fable 2 did.
I really think this has nothing to do with Capcom's developing new content and charging for it. Y'all are some haters for trying to tie the two together.

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, I personally think that they are doing it to make Capcom look worse. But that is not the reason I commented,


I commented to say... I like the Vector Man avatar!
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:58AM Lordchimp said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@tboy123

ah, you like Vector Man but the real question is..

Does Vector Man like you???
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 12:14PM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Vectorman dedicated his life to dumping Earth's toxic sludge into the sun (except for when warhead took over the world - then he got sidetracked)! He likes EVERYONE.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
um burnouts first set of dlc was free as well, perhaps this is a new business model ea are adopting. maybe they feel guilty about some less than adequate games in the past

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:54AM Jerkamie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ea has no heart, they must have over looked it.

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 11:59AM Lordchimp said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Isn't Redwood Shores the same division of EA that made Dead Space? If it is, I am in for this game.

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 12:06PM petepete said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow i gotta say, EA is smart trying to take advantage of our hatred for capcom. either way though, this game is going to suck, so this news is moot

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 12:39PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is that a hat jammed into that guy's leg?

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 12:56PM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe he pissed off Kung Lao.
Reply

Posted: Mar 19th 2009 6:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
:oD
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 12:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is that pic of the Wii, or PS2 version?

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 1:54PM robotoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BURN!
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 2:01PM robotoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think there's that much hype for this game (am I wrong?) and maybe they know it and if the game doesn't sell that well even less people would buy just a multiplayer mode.

It's a multiplayer mode! I just don't get why you don't get it Capcom!, game modes are title updates, not whole-new-added-experiences kind of content, like new song tracks, new maps, new missions, etc. that's the dlc that should have a price. Valve gets it, Criterion gets it, even when Activision was gonna add new game modes to COD4 was getting it.

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 2:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gangsters don't "pop" other gangsters.

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 2:18PM Deck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I will be buying this game, mainly because they supported Area5 and it will be my indirect way of supporting A5 and their content.

But as far as the DLC goes, whatever the reason, free is always good. Not every developer under EA has charged for DLC either, consider Criterion for an example. EA didn't make the charge (until maybe this year?).

Posted: Mar 18th 2009 5:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really, REALLY want to see him pull the trigger with the gun at that angle.

Posted: Mar 19th 2009 4:50AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I always thought that these release day patches/dlc were more about preventing piracy and cutting down on 2nd hand sales....

is that not the case?

Posted: Mar 20th 2009 10:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this is crazy capcom is not breaking off pieces of the game and charging you for it because multiplayer was never a part of any resident evil. they are simply trying something out and if you want to try it out then loosen your scrooge like grip of the modest 5 bucks and try it but if you dont want to then DONT BUY IT!!!! would you guyz rather them put it i the and if it suck have a more crappier version re5!

Posted: Mar 21st 2009 11:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Godfather is my fav movie. Just found out that you can also watch it online at:

http://50-classics.blogspot.com/2009/03/godfather-1972.html

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW