You remember Bob's Game, don't you? The humble 2D RPG made by a single, possibly loony, individual? Well nearly two months have gone by since the game's creator Robert Pelloni was denied developer status by Nintendo and -- other than a NYC littering spree -- we've heard little about the game as of late. In an interview with Nintendo big boss Reggie Fils-Aime on MTV Multiplayer last week, however, the record was set considerably straighter.
When asked for his side of the story on what had come to pass, the Regginator had this to say: "He did submit to be a licensed developer. We have an evaluation process. We evaluated the opportunity. We decided at this point in time that he did not meet the requirements to be a licensed developer." Well that about does it then, no? Apparently MTV wanted more from the conversation, pushing the CEO on what to do if a developer wants to work with Nintendo but doesn't necessarily have two or three major games under its belt, "My hope is that any developer who has a compelling idea will reach out to our licensing organization and share their idea and go through the process of becoming a licensed developer for the Nintendo platform," Fils-Aime said, "And we have a legacy of supporting that type of development."
Unfortunately, as it seems, Mr. Pelloni's game wasn't quite "compelling" enough of an idea.
Reggie on Bob's Game: Refused license doesn't reflect on Nintendo's support for the little guy
126
Reader Comments (126)
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 3:38PM (Unverified) said
Mr. Gilbert, did you work for this blog when it used to be called DS Fanboy? Because if you peruse the site archives, you'll note that DS Fanboy extensively covered hombrew and flashcarts (they even included a homebrew guide to help you get set up). Additionally, flashcarts are by no means illegal--if I wanted to, I could buy a flashcart throught perfectly legal channels right now. And finally, kudos to you for sharing my personal info in your response--it almost seemed like a vague threat, which we all know is very professional.
Also, @Saria the Cat, I was a bit rude in my comment, but I was just irked that they linked to the littering incident without at least in passing explaining that it didn't occur, for example. Or, as another example, they didn't include any links to Bob's website. Anyway, the game is playable on no$GBA, so even if you don't have a flashcart, you can try it out.
Also, @Saria the Cat, I was a bit rude in my comment, but I was just irked that they linked to the littering incident without at least in passing explaining that it didn't occur, for example. Or, as another example, they didn't include any links to Bob's website. Anyway, the game is playable on no$GBA, so even if you don't have a flashcart, you can try it out.
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 3:46PM Laser Sanchez said
Shouldn't we all be rooting for this guy to get a devkit? If he gets a devkit, the following could happen:
1. Bob invests serious money into publishing and distributing the game. It fails epically and he finally shuts up about his game not getting published. He fades into obscurity. Detractors lol hard.
2. Bob invests serious money into publishing and distributing the game. It does all right or awesomely. He makes another game and has to figure out a different and probably obnoxious way to market it.
Are we afraid of scenario 2, even if we've mostly agreed it's not good, or are we just assuming he's doing this to viral market his ROM download?
1. Bob invests serious money into publishing and distributing the game. It fails epically and he finally shuts up about his game not getting published. He fades into obscurity. Detractors lol hard.
2. Bob invests serious money into publishing and distributing the game. It does all right or awesomely. He makes another game and has to figure out a different and probably obnoxious way to market it.
Are we afraid of scenario 2, even if we've mostly agreed it's not good, or are we just assuming he's doing this to viral market his ROM download?
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 3:56PM Saria the Cat said
Well, I'm not afraid of him or anyone else doing well and producing a quality product. I am just skeptical that he would and I understand why Nintendo would not find him to be of adequate resources or standing to be developing for them. Also, a character this notorious for being so in-your-face and "fuck you, let me make my game" shouldn't expect cooperation from any company. I am sure if Bob had acted responsibly and maturely, and produced something that was of interest to Nintendo, he would have gotten his devkit. But acting like a complete asshat and outputting less-than-stellar work got him nowhere, as it should.
I do see what you mean, though. Right now, Bob has an "excuse" for not having produced great work: he doesn't have a devkit. And if he was given one, he could finally shut up and have no excuse not to produce a solid product.
Reply
I do see what you mean, though. Right now, Bob has an "excuse" for not having produced great work: he doesn't have a devkit. And if he was given one, he could finally shut up and have no excuse not to produce a solid product.
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 4:13PM Laser Sanchez said
I'm just curious how screwed up his game is that games like Imagine: Babyz and Imagine: Babysitters (Ubisoft games with the exact same concept, I think) are totally ok in concept for the handheld, but this one isn't. Not curious enough to drop real money on it, just curious.
Reply
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 4:40PM Saria the Cat said
Yeah, they're pretty fucked up. I guess the main point is that Ubisoft also produces things that aren't bat-shit insane poor quality. If Ubisoft came to Nintendo with no experience, no established qualifications, and only one product and it looked pretty bad, I'm sure they wouldn't be offered a devkit.
Reply
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 4:47PM jhoff80 said
I'm not sure why we should care, but I know that Nintendo cares because they don't want the most recent versions of their devkits leaked into the wild when this person who doesn't seem to be the most stable out there gets pissed off nobody bought his game or something.
Reply
Posted: Apr 5th 2009 8:46AM Gnoll said
Here's something for everyone else to consider: these shovelware games like the Babyz and Cheerleader ones are made by REPUTABLE COMPANIES that Nintendo can trust with a devkit. Their review process is about who should be allowed to make DS games, not which games get to come out on the DS. Also, you have to consider that quite a few DS owners are little girls who want to play these games. Almost every time I've gone out to buy a DS game there would be at least one little girl in there looking for a new one, and that's what they tend to buy and enjoy.
Sure, they look completely dumb to everyone else, but hell, not all games are supposed to target the regular gamer audience. Non-gamers have started buying Wiis and DSes, and so games for non-gamers are being made. I don't know why Nintendo gets so much crap over making games for a new audience of people that are buying their systems. The rest of us don't have to buy them, we can keep buying the same games we always have (and I really do mean the same because Nintendo mostly just focuses on their old franchises like always). Nintendo's just doing their job.
Reply
Sure, they look completely dumb to everyone else, but hell, not all games are supposed to target the regular gamer audience. Non-gamers have started buying Wiis and DSes, and so games for non-gamers are being made. I don't know why Nintendo gets so much crap over making games for a new audience of people that are buying their systems. The rest of us don't have to buy them, we can keep buying the same games we always have (and I really do mean the same because Nintendo mostly just focuses on their old franchises like always). Nintendo's just doing their job.
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 4:41PM jhoff80 said
Anyone who thinks that he should've been given a dev kit, download the demo, seriously. It's the most boring game I've ever played, filled with a ton of stupid things that the developer seems to think are hilarious... like finding tissues and lotion in your brother's bedroom, naming the main character "Yuu", telling you to press A, then B, then C to start, etc, but it's really all just annoying. Whether it was a viral campaign or not, the game makes him seem every bit as immature as the locking himself in his room thing. Not to mention he doesn't seem to grasp basic grammar because the "Yuu" pun aside, there's a ton of times when someone is talking to someone and uses the third-person form of verbs.
Picture Retro Game Challenge, remove all the fun, add stupid humor, and add an annoying fetch quest before you can even start to play the games, and that's what this game is.
And as for people saying that games that are even crappier sold on the system are sold all the time, well of course. But for example, the Petz games are developed by Ubisoft. While Ubisoft does release horrible games like that, they pump them out much faster, and have a history that includes quality games as well. (In other words, they're not given devkits based on the quality of a single game alone).
Picture Retro Game Challenge, remove all the fun, add stupid humor, and add an annoying fetch quest before you can even start to play the games, and that's what this game is.
And as for people saying that games that are even crappier sold on the system are sold all the time, well of course. But for example, the Petz games are developed by Ubisoft. While Ubisoft does release horrible games like that, they pump them out much faster, and have a history that includes quality games as well. (In other words, they're not given devkits based on the quality of a single game alone).
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 4:59PM doom saber said
Don't forget about idiotic the nintendo jokes are in the game.
Reply
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 5:06PM Author X said
I think anyone who complains about Nintendo refusing to support small developers needs to read this article: http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3903/postmortem_riverman_medias_.php
Yeah, it took a lot of work to get Nintendo to support them, but y'know what, they worked for it. And they proved they're professional, and they know what they're doing. And not some guy coding in his bedroom.
Yeah, it took a lot of work to get Nintendo to support them, but y'know what, they worked for it. And they proved they're professional, and they know what they're doing. And not some guy coding in his bedroom.
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 5:14PM Harrishun said
Why doesn't he just release it as homebrew? People weren't going to buy it anyway.
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 6:06PM (Unverified) said
Well I give a shit about this guy, so don't be so god damn arrogant Hace. I think Nintendo are being real pricks here. Give Bob a chance. He's got a halfway decent game which if I actually owned one of these devices I might consider purchasing. And so what if the game isn't "up to their standards"? People have a right NOT to buy it. I mean give me a break here, Nintendo is acting like the big corporate bully.
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 6:16PM (Unverified) said
That's one fanboy Nintendo lost.
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 7:35PM (Unverified) said
Well, the whole game involves being able to bear the "Yuu" pun. I can't. Can Yuu?
Posted: Apr 8th 2009 12:50AM Yothe said
I think some of yuu guys are missing the point!
"My little Pony: Rainbow addition" is garrunteed to sell, unlike bob's game.
"My little Pony: Rainbow addition" is garrunteed to sell, unlike bob's game.
Posted: Apr 4th 2009 10:21PM (Unverified) said
While some small studio's may be lucky enough to be graced with the honor of becoming licensed developers, they still have to live up to the lofty requirements set in place. It still means that no individuals can break into the scene, as was the example with Bob (regardless of what people think of him and his antics). So far, the only company to really allow for that has been Microsoft. I can only hope that someone finds a way to run homebrew on the DSi, otherwise we'll probably never see programs from solo individuals on the system.
Posted: Apr 5th 2009 2:54AM Slaziman said
Anyone else tired of hearing about this guy?
Posted: Apr 5th 2009 8:36AM Gnoll said
PROTIP: Just because something is hard to make doesn't mean every one who manages to make one did a good job. If I make a giant, beautiful wedding cake that tastes like shit, should I get applause for making it?
Posted: Apr 5th 2009 11:39AM Laser Sanchez said
Destination Software, a cake maker who made 1 edible cake and 99 shitty cakes is still a reputable cake maker.
Reply
Posted: Apr 5th 2009 11:54AM Laser Sanchez said
Didn't you essentially argue that not every game is for everyone above?
Reply
Posted: Apr 5th 2009 8:28PM Nael M said
The reason is that Bob doesn't meet the requirements to be an authorized Nintendo developer, and Destination Software does. The requirements include having previous experience developing high-quality software (from what I can tell, Bob's Game is the only project he's ever worked), the business must operate from secure offices that aren't a personal residence (in other words, not a home office like the one Bob works from), have stable financial backing (if Bob's spending most of his free time working on his game, how is he supporting himself financially?) and can be trusted not to give away important development information and contacts that Nintendo entrusts them with (Bob sure as hell didn't meet this one with the way's he's been acting). The full details of the qualifications can be found here: http://weiminai.wikidot.com/rough-notes
You can yammer on "but.. but...but Destination Software's games suck!", but they meet the requirements to be an authorized Nintendo developer - and those requirements have nothing to do with the quality of the software and everything to do with how the business is run. Unless you can prove Destination Software is some guy working from a home office and operating the company on a McDonald's cashier's salary, they meet the requirements to get a DS dev kit.
You can yammer on "but.. but...but Destination Software's games suck!", but they meet the requirements to be an authorized Nintendo developer - and those requirements have nothing to do with the quality of the software and everything to do with how the business is run. Unless you can prove Destination Software is some guy working from a home office and operating the company on a McDonald's cashier's salary, they meet the requirements to get a DS dev kit.
Posted: Apr 6th 2009 5:46AM (Unverified) said
Maybe if he didn't have such a shitty title he would have gotten more recognition from N
Posted: Apr 7th 2009 11:26PM JoshMilewski said
Last I heard, didn't you need like a decent office or something to be a developer for Nintendo?
Or some proof of financial backing or something like that?
Or some proof of financial backing or something like that?




