Day two of news regarding the Scratch: The Ultimate DJ LLC vs. Activision lawsuit has arrived, and with it a comprehensive analysis of the "full 30-page complaint" by way of Gamasutra. Before we launch into that though, we first put this question to you, dearest readers: What the heck do we call this thing? Scratch-gate? Court Scratch Fever? Breakin' (the law) 2: Electric Boogaloo? You tell us!
Aside from the litany of information we already know, the piece paints an interesting tale of tortuous interference on the side of DJ Hero publisher Activision ostensibly strong-arming Scratch: The Ultimate DJ developer Genius Products (and its partner, Numark) into releasing its game later than Activision's. Furthermore, the suit alleges that 7 Studios, former contracted developer of Scratch for Genius Products (and recently purchased by Activision), is still withholding "nine custom-manufactured turntable and beat-button game controllers" belonging to Numark.
To help break down the analysis with significantly more expertise and clarity, we contacted LGJ columnist Mark Methenitis, who had this to say:
"If you thought Silicon Knights vs. Epic had the potential to get ugly, imagine the stakes when the next major branch of the music game genre hangs in the balance. Taking Genius's claims at face value, Activision is basically trying to bully them out of the market so that Activision's own DJ Hero can become the top billing DJ-based music game. This is similar to the claim that Silicon Knights made, where they alleged Epic was neglecting the Unreal Engine 3 licensees to benefit Gears of War. The major difference here is when Activision couldn't buy the game, it bought the developer to control the game's development and attempt to force the hand of Genius. This gets into tortuous interference with the existing development agreement, the basic gist of which is that as a third party, you're not allowed to interfere with someone else's contract. Of course, there's likely another side to this story, which I'm sure Activision will present in its answer to Genius's claims."
Reader Comments (11)
Posted: Apr 15th 2009 10:18PM aristokrat said
Yeah, the other side is probably a big "Nuh-uh." That's anti-competitive behavior, and Activision should be bitch-slapped with a huge fine. It'd be refreshing to see the courts actually act on this, since lately they are generally too worried about upsetting some important American business or other (see the US's treatment of Microsoft vs. Europe's). Since Activision is hardly important in the eyes of the government, I see no reason why they couldn't smite them mightily.
Reply
Posted: Apr 15th 2009 10:45PM (Unverified) said
Call it "DJ Jazzy Judge and the Fresh Litigation"
Reply
Posted: Apr 15th 2009 11:33PM Laser123454321 said
Second comment like that in a row....
thats awesome!
Also, I think that Activision might have been trying to pull a konami, but instead of buying the IP, they're buying the dev to absorb the game. (See In The Groove becoming Konami property, and for laughs check out ITG 2 R21, released right before ROXOR lost control of the development)
Reply
thats awesome!
Also, I think that Activision might have been trying to pull a konami, but instead of buying the IP, they're buying the dev to absorb the game. (See In The Groove becoming Konami property, and for laughs check out ITG 2 R21, released right before ROXOR lost control of the development)
Posted: Apr 16th 2009 12:22AM (Unverified) said
What is with all the Breakin' 2 references lately? How does a meme begin for a movie that no one has seen?
Reply
Posted: Apr 16th 2009 10:15AM (Unverified) said
Props on the Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo reference. That is prime 80's right there.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
GameStop sees majority of digital sales from cash; won't pursue used PC game sales
Posted on Feb 10th 2012 5:45PM
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 155 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 108 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments






