Activision responds to Scratch lawsuit, court denies restraining order
Moving into day three of Breakin' (the law) 2: Electric Boogaloo, Activision has fired back at Scratch: The Ultimate DJ LLC (Numark and Genius Products' joint business venture). It says allegations made in the lawsuit "are disingenuous and lack any merit," and backs up that statement with the Los Angeles Superior Court's decision not to grant a restraining order against the mega-publisher.
Furthermore, Activision claims that Genius Products is scapegoating the publisher, explicitly stating, "These allegations are nothing more than an attempt by Genius [Products] to place blame for the game's delays, as well as to divert attention from the cash flow, liquidity and revenue challenges Genius detailed in its Mar. 30 SEC filing."
The press release makes no mention of the "nine custom-manufactured turntable and beat-button game controllers" allegedly belonging to Numark nor the current state of development of Scratch: The Ultimate DJ, presumably still being held by Activision-owned 7 Studios. It does, however, tell us that the lawsuit will have "no effect" on the development of Activision's own DJ-based rhythm game, DJ Hero. We've asked Activision for its official side of the story and will update this post accordingly as news develops.
Update: Activision has responded to our request for comment with, "Unfortunately, we do not have anything more to comment outside of the statement we put out."
Furthermore, Activision claims that Genius Products is scapegoating the publisher, explicitly stating, "These allegations are nothing more than an attempt by Genius [Products] to place blame for the game's delays, as well as to divert attention from the cash flow, liquidity and revenue challenges Genius detailed in its Mar. 30 SEC filing."
The press release makes no mention of the "nine custom-manufactured turntable and beat-button game controllers" allegedly belonging to Numark nor the current state of development of Scratch: The Ultimate DJ, presumably still being held by Activision-owned 7 Studios. It does, however, tell us that the lawsuit will have "no effect" on the development of Activision's own DJ-based rhythm game, DJ Hero. We've asked Activision for its official side of the story and will update this post accordingly as news develops.
Update: Activision has responded to our request for comment with, "Unfortunately, we do not have anything more to comment outside of the statement we put out."













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Young_Nastyman @ Apr 16th 2009 5:40PM
In other words, we fucked them over and we don't care
GewurztraminerX @ Apr 16th 2009 5:45PM
Needs more quotation marks:
"Activision has responded to our request for comment with, "Unfortunately, we do not have anything more to comment outside of the statement "we put out."""
Maverick Saturn @ Apr 16th 2009 5:50PM
This can only be settled the old fashioned way :D
In the ring
PS36Wii Fanboy @ Apr 16th 2009 7:30PM
Wait, you mean in the Thunderdome?
PS36Wii Fanboy @ Apr 16th 2009 7:32PM
Wait, you mean the Thunderdome?
Alex (The Pope NJ) @ Apr 16th 2009 5:55PM
Activision is what is wrong with the gaming world. Only in it for the almighty dollar what happen to the passion for gaming that I am sure was the foundation of the company.
Happy_man @ Apr 16th 2009 7:26PM
Komani where the hell are you.
Christ-ian @ Apr 16th 2009 7:28PM
Activation sounds that stuttering guy in the dry cleaners near the end of Fight Club when Ed Norton is going from place to place seeing where 'Tyler' went.
"I'm not exposed to speak any such information to you, nor would I even if I had said information you want, at this juncture be able."
"You're a moron."
"I'm afraid I'm gonna have to ask you to leave."
PS36Wii Fanboy @ Apr 16th 2009 7:33PM
Damn you comment bar! and duplicating deviousness!
ftrunks2000_69 @ Apr 16th 2009 8:09PM
wow video game pirates....I almost hat Activation more then ea now....almost...
sqweak @ Apr 16th 2009 10:34PM
"Restraining Order"? I think the PR author meant Injunction, and I'm dubious that LASC has already made a ruling.