As rumor has it, Chinese internet company NetEase has a totally huge crush on Blizzard. It made its first clear attempt at courtship last August by snatching up the rights to operate Battle.net in China, but a recent press release from Blizzard revealed the company's biggest, Say Anything-esque display of affection to date -- NetEase will be taking over operating duties for World of Warcraft when current operator The9's contract expires June 8.
Of course, if NetEase wanted to win over the hearts of the Chinese MMO-playing population, they'd push for the release of Wrath of the Lich King, which still hasn't dropped in the region. Chinese news site DoNews reports that NetEase has licensed Wrath, though they haven't made any formal announcements regarding its release.
[Via Massively]
Reader Comments (21)
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 9:44PM (Unverified) said
Give the people lich king already. Is there even a reasonble excuse why it hasn't released yet, aside from squabling over 1 or 2 percentage points of profit?
Reply
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 9:47PM TheDarkWayne said
wikipedia says that as of January 22 2008, China had 5.5 million players as compared to 2.5 in America and 2 in Europe, that's hardly 1 or 2 Percent of profit
Reply
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 9:50PM (Unverified) said
I'm refering to how the powers that be divide up the revenues and royalties. That's usually why theses things take so long
Reply
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 9:56PM TheDarkWayne said
Well, they aren't a nonprofit charity, they're here to make money
Reply
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 10:05PM (Unverified) said
It was merely an observation, no need to take offense. I'm not looking for an argument.
Reply
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 11:11PM (Unverified) said
"Is there even a reasonble excuse"
Yes, actually. The PRC has banned Lich King as-is because of its disturbing, downright scatological imagery. Specifically, it has skeletons in it.
Reply
Yes, actually. The PRC has banned Lich King as-is because of its disturbing, downright scatological imagery. Specifically, it has skeletons in it.
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 10:06PM HydrophobicFish PSN ID Hydrophob said
The issue isn't at all with profits, the issue is that it's pretty much banned.
China has banned Skeletons pretty much entirely (Yeah, I know, it's silly, but that's besides the point.)
The forsaken (and occasional unit) have skeletons, and skeletons exposed, however, in the Chinese version, they do not.
Seeing as how WotLK is pretty much skeleton central USA... it's kinda a lot harder to just edit a couple models here and there.
Reply
China has banned Skeletons pretty much entirely (Yeah, I know, it's silly, but that's besides the point.)
The forsaken (and occasional unit) have skeletons, and skeletons exposed, however, in the Chinese version, they do not.
Seeing as how WotLK is pretty much skeleton central USA... it's kinda a lot harder to just edit a couple models here and there.
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 11:08PM (Unverified) said
You are right.
By the way, while a player is dead in the World of Warcraft, there is no skeleton corp but a tiny tomb instead~~
Imaging the battleground Alterac Valley, World of Tombs ~~~
That's more funny~~
Reply
By the way, while a player is dead in the World of Warcraft, there is no skeleton corp but a tiny tomb instead~~
Imaging the battleground Alterac Valley, World of Tombs ~~~
That's more funny~~
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 11:02PM blueskyv201 said
You guys should get a new picture to put in your wow articles. This screenshot looks like it was taken in version 1.01.
Reply
Posted: Apr 18th 2009 11:45PM TheDarkWayne said
the gear is horribly mismatched, the red human has mid teens gear, the golden guy is 30s, the dwarf has Baron Rivendares sword from Strat, and the night elf has mid 50 stuff, and they're all in SM!
Reply
Posted: Apr 19th 2009 12:10AM Slob Zombie said
Seriously. They would all be Deathknights in an up-to-date picture.
Reply
Posted: Apr 19th 2009 1:44AM Slob Zombie said
Why did you even read this article? I don't read the ones about being a virgin douchebag.
Reply
Posted: Apr 19th 2009 2:37AM blueskyv201 said
@Linkario
Said the guy with the "Princess of Zelda" avatar.
Reply
Said the guy with the "Princess of Zelda" avatar.
Posted: Apr 19th 2009 11:12AM TheDarkWayne said
no it isn't. See "Same model as", none of those are from SFK
http://www.wowhead.com/?item=13505
Reply
http://www.wowhead.com/?item=13505
Posted: Apr 19th 2009 4:29AM Paviel said
Homophones are a pain, aren't they?
You're right, though. Reign is kingship; rein is what you use to control a horse.
It might be appropriate to say that NetEase has snagged kingship of World of Warcraft... except that "reign" is never plural, as far as I know.
Reply
You're right, though. Reign is kingship; rein is what you use to control a horse.
It might be appropriate to say that NetEase has snagged kingship of World of Warcraft... except that "reign" is never plural, as far as I know.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments









