| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (125)

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:28AM Apex Omega said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Finallly
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 2:20AM Cash9007 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's what I was thinking. This should have been out months ago, but was pushed back to April, only to be apparently pushed back again to freakin' Cinco De Mayo. I stopped playing back then they announced the removal of the level cap, as I'd already reached 20, so what was the point of continuing the pointless grind?

Oh well, I waited this long... what's 14 more days?
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:30AM wargamer17 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't even completed the game yet, but that is really really good news!! I've been trying to do everything I can in the game before completing it. Now that I can go back, plus all the DLC, it's awesome!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 12:09PM latin trident said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't purchased the game yet but when I do, I will make sure it is Fallout 3 with all of the DLC included on the disc; Like Oblivion with all of the DLC included. Nice!

Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:31AM Timerider said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That laser bazooka looks awesome.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yah, excitation.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
god damnit put the dlc's on PS3!!! every single person who bought the game will buy the packs.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
god damnit put the dlc's on PS3!!! every single person who bought the game will buy the packs. we always get shafted
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 2:51PM leobebes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That is what I have been saying. I own a PS3 and I love it! MLB the Show is awesome! But the 360 clearly has the most third party support this generation and deservedly so. The 360 is inexpensive enough now to be a complimentary system and for some people to flat our refuse to buy one out of pure stubbornness makes me sad when I hear bitching and moaning about the lead platform acting like *gasp* the lead platform.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 3:45PM floating coffins said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report


that's a lot of typing for a guy with so many games to play on their 360.

:P
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 3:46PM Pipp said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bought the PS3 version and I own a 360 as well. I had no idea DLC was locked to PC or 360 versions only when I got the game.

Bethesda really f'ing sucks for doing this. If they had a trade-in program where I could send my PS3 version for a 360 version I'd be up for that.

That said, I've been a huge Bethesda fan since Terminator: Future Shock, but this crap they're pulling with Fallout 3 should bar them from any awards they're getting for this game.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 3:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
that has got to be the most flaming 360fanboy rant i've ever heard!

"Of course over the last three years, there has not been much to use it for other than playing blu-rays."

why even throw that statement in there. I bought a 60gb original ps3 and i love it. i do have a life and enjoy other things such as outdoor activities, hanging out with friends, having a girlfriend, etc etc. i don't need two systems. with the economy in the slumps its hard for me too justify buying another expensive system. sure i would love to play left 4 dead, or halo wars, and fable 2. the simple fact that microsoft had 50 million dollars or whatever to put in bethesdas pocket is simply crazy. i guess greed overrules the fans.

also, you could have probably done a lot more with your 20 minutes spent writing your post.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 6:12PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so... $10 dlc or a $400 elite (which is the only 360 model i would consider buying)?
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 6:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well... Bethesda did say before the game release that it will look better on the PC and 360 and all DLC is EXCLUSIVE to the 360 and PC. So its not our fault you were an idiot and didn't research into your purchase.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 7:12PM Pipp said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Since when do games require you to follow dev quotes to decide on buying games? It's ridiculous. I bought the game on a whim because I was bored. I had the 360 version in my hand, and decided to get the PS3 version because they had the collectors lunchbox edition for the same price. I had NO IDEA Bethesda was going to f me in the rear over such a decision.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 7:15PM Biohazard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
swag did you really just type all of that in response to a one-liner? jesus christ who cares
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 7:38PM dslam1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Swagman, you do realize that technically speaking dlc is sold at a higher percentage of installed base for the ps3 than the 360....

and before you rant again, i own a 360, wii and ps3 and i have fallout 3 on the 360.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 12:11AM mynk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i dont get all the arguments that talk of how it is bad of microsoft to pay developers money in order to get exclusives, and saying how sony cannot afford the same.

think about it for two fucking seconds, and any 5 year old will be able to tell you

a. that as a buisness, microsoft will only invest relatively small amounts compared to how much profit they are making off the deal. the number of people that went for the DLC, and bought fallout 3 on the 360 instead was so great that the 50 million they put in the developers pocket more than paid off for itself by a few folds. thats what buisness do.

b. the developer or rather their publishers only agreed to the deal because either they only like developing on 360 or they would make much more total profit off making it exclusive and getting paid that microsoft bonus, which is a big win for the developer with half the work and double the cash, giving them money for bigger projects in the future, hence better games

c. that with sony dealing in the same buisness as microsoft - the money microsoft spends is from its gaming divison too, not from their windows divison - so sony could make that kind of an INvESTMENT for their gamers too, not to mention the money they also make from their home electronics lineup + VIAO + ericson.

d. as a gamer, i would rather that the compnay that makes my console care about me enough in order to ensure quality content that justifies my choice, because if they were to not secure such exclusives or promote such development, then i would have nothing to play in the first place.

i think the reason that microsoft understands the kind of marketing where you can buy out exclusives, or rather promote dlc development on their consoles is enough to buy their console. because you can be sure you'll be in for something sweet like fallout 3 DLC.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 1:21PM Larz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pip is the shining light of reason in this thread.

Mynk: Bribing is always wrong, and arguing that "everyone else does it" does not make it right.
Reply

Posted: Apr 25th 2009 4:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Swagman: Why must you write a manual telling PS3 owners off? Whether XBOX owners "needed" to buy a PS2 or not is completely irrelevant. I own a PS3, I want DLC for my Fallout game without needing to put money on another toy.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3 !!!! PS3!!!!!!!!!!! PS3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sorry. i had to....
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
2009, year of the DLC? First The lost and the damned, then banjo kazooie Nuts and bolts (yes, its a great game), Left 4 dead and now even more Fallout 3 DLC.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:56PM TheDrizzle659 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't forget the fable DLC, and Halo's mythic map pack.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:45AM Lordchimp said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I been waiting for this DLC to come out. Now I can buy all three packs and also buy Lost and Damned (good thing school semester ends next week).
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 12:32PM Jerk Face said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Me too. Though I've already played Lost and Damned (It's pretty fuckin' good, by the way). Now I can rip through this and the other two DLC packs and actually get my EXP for doing so!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 1:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also waiting to purchase all 3 at once. Makes no sense to play the first two when my EXP doesn't count for anything.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:50AM BrayG said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I thought for sure they would raise the price. This is good news. Kudos to Bethesda for doing right by the community. I already have over a hundred dollars invested in this game.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 1:19PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Right by the community to neglect over a million PS3 users? Right by the community to release earlier expansions that had to be patched because the few hours of gameplay they provided was not production ready? Horse armor. Seriously, Horse freaking armor.

I don't know, I really don't feel like Bethesda has the whole community thing down yet.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:52AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
bah....get at me when the shit is on PS3....

I mean did MS pay for it to be Exclusive like FOREVER??? or just a year or 2??
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:30AM floating coffins said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It'll never happen. Really, I never cared about having the DLC - I just wanted the level cap raised.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:53AM djenkins83 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*drool

I just bought this game, after renting it and beating it, then i let my cousin borrow it - dummie - but I am happy when I get it back and play through again it won't end this time!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:57AM jetsaredim said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why will Bethesda not release this DLC for PS3??
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:34AM Swizzler said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think its Live only, since its distributed through GFW on PC and not through their own method or through steam.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:49AM Alphathon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, it is through live, but that's not why it's not on PS3. I'm pretty sure it's because Microsoft payed Bethesda to only put it on their platforms, like with Rockstar and GTA IV. Could be wrong though. *likes that he has it on the PC and not PS3...Mods and DLC FTW*
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 2:54PM DeepFriedSushi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
has to do with the success of live vs psn distrubtion of dlc. the dlc are somwhat large so rather than to deal with the bandwidth fees on psn they just had it exclusive to live. also xbox has a very large market share in america. also i think they know that the ps3 version is buggy so adding any dlc could be a nightmare to debug.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:48PM rhcpsfan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why on earth was he down-rated for that comment. It's a perfectly reasonable question . A huge amount of ps3 users bought the game from a company that they thought cared about them the same as anyone else. Now with no official explanation as to why from the company they tell us that if we want to be treated the same we have to change our system to the one that's paying them the most. That's pure and simple greed, and I for one expected more from a company who's products I have enjoyed for years.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 6:16PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no MS did pay them off for it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:58AM Gemini Ace said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I haven't played the game and don't really care, but doesn't completely changing the original ending of a game ruin the experience?

If Bungie came along and retroactively changed the ending to Halo 3 just so they could tack on paid content, wouldn't that cheapen the original ending?

Just sayin'...
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:06AM baby sea tuna said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"I haven't played the game and don't really care"

You really just should have stopped there.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:37AM Swizzler said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
but... halo 3 didn't have an ending, it had a cliffhanger, they all had cliffhangers 'cept for the original Halo (aka the good one) so your argument has failed in that not only did halo leave out an ending to tack on additional GAMES but they were designed that way from the beginning. your argument fails miserably.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:54AM Snowblind said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The original Halo's ending was more a cliff hanger than the third games, which ended the story pretty nicely, while still leaving open MC's story for a sequel.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 12:10PM Alphathon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
[spoiler alert!] (if you havn't finished the game)

Judging by the article, it doesn't actually change that much. The story is the same, it just meens that the player doesn't have to die. Basically to finish the game, you have to go into a radiation flooded room to operate a machine. You can have companions who are resistant to radiation and wouldn't die, but they all refuse to do it (along the lines of "This is your destiny, I cannot do this for you"). It actually makes the ending make more sense, by removing the "f*ck you, we could all survive, but we're all stubborn and so you have to die"
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 12:16PM Gemini Ace said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
No, I'm good. Thanks!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 6:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, mainly because the ending of Fallout 3 doesn't strand the main character in the middle of the void. You're also comparing two completely different genres: while one is a directed experience, the other is a place for the player to inhabit. Halo was linear, and adding more campaign content would feel 'tacked on'. Raising the (moronic) level cap and giving the world of Fallout 3 a greater lease of life with the ability to see the main plot out to its conclusion, while also adding more things to do in the world itself, is a necessary addition which only enriches the experience rather than cheapening it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 10:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So.. When does the "Game of the Year Edition" comes out?
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:01AM Roncore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
haha, seriously! With all the good content coming to XBL these past few months, I'm starting to run out of Hard Drive space!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 3:19PM In A World said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm waiting for the GOTY edition as well, but if the Oblivion GOTY is any indication, you'll still have to install all the DLC from a second disc, so it really won't save on HDD space. On the plus side though you can uninstall/reinstall without having to re-download.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:00AM DrZ said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why isn't any of the DLC coming to PS3??!!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:33AM floating coffins said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"...We aren’t going to get into the details of the hows and whys," said Bethesda marketing boss Pete Hines in an e-mail. "[DLC] will be exclusive for PC and 360. [We're] not going to give any other qualifiers or clarifications as it relates to other platforms."
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 12:52PM Geist said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
In other words, "Microsoft gave us a truckload of cash to keep it away from the PS3."
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Time Ducks (iOS)

Posted on Feb 7th 2012 9:00PM

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW