Announced during GDC 2009, Sony's development-cost-matching scheme, "Pub Fund," is already garnering praise from the first company to take advantage of it. Burn Zombie Burn studio Doublesix tells Develop that the program -- which matches a PSN game's production costs in royalties, in exchange for PS3 exclusivity -- is "invaluable," not only in terms of funding, but marketing support as well.
James Brooksby, studio head of Doublesix, spoke to other developers, saying, "I think there's a number of other ways in which the Pub Fund can help you, not least because Sony suddenly has a more vested interest in your product's success." Since Sony is looking for a good return on its considerably sizable investment, not everyone can get on the Pub Fund. "Obviously there will be a level of quality expected from Sony's side, so not everyone will be suitable for Sony either," said Brooksby.
"We put a lot of money into the marketing of Burn Zombie Burn," Brooksby said. "And our own funding, along with Sony's, helped achieve great exposure for the game." That exposure has left the developer "absolutely delighted" with BZB's sales to date, and, according to Brooksby, the team is already at work on its next title -- no doubt with the assistance of the Fund.
Reader Comments (39)
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:03PM DeepFriedSushi said
okay, all those sony fanboys who said only ms "pays" for exclusives need to eat a sock.
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:06PM aristokrat said
Way to reply in a coherent manner, as opposed to top-replying as a way to get your invaluable opinion in everyone's face.
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 5:54PM megapenguinx said
You're RSS eating Pacman fits your comment quite well :D
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 3:54PM halebound00 said
This game is so much fun its ridiculous. I got it last night and ended up playing it for 5 hours and had no clue how fast time went by. Even my wife loves it. It's the best purchase I've made in a while. Get it ASAP.
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 3:55PM HydrophobicFish PSN ID Hydrophob said
It is pretty good, definitely worth the 10 bucks.
The only complaint I have with it, is how it's not dual-stick. It fires forward, or there's a button to lock on to the nearest zombie (you hold it, and it dynamically choses the closest)
But that's a minor complaint. It could easily be patched to give the option for dual-stick, but even if it's never patched for that, it's not that bad, the controls still work.
Reply
The only complaint I have with it, is how it's not dual-stick. It fires forward, or there's a button to lock on to the nearest zombie (you hold it, and it dynamically choses the closest)
But that's a minor complaint. It could easily be patched to give the option for dual-stick, but even if it's never patched for that, it's not that bad, the controls still work.
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:00PM (Unverified) said
@ Hydrophobicfish
I thought that too until I began playing around. If you use the aim function and THEN move the right analog stick you can free aim rather than having it choose the closest or easiest target. It's a bit backwards but it works pretty well and is great for any auto weapon. Give it a try
Reply
I thought that too until I began playing around. If you use the aim function and THEN move the right analog stick you can free aim rather than having it choose the closest or easiest target. It's a bit backwards but it works pretty well and is great for any auto weapon. Give it a try
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:55PM (Unverified) said
@AmanteDuck
Yep, you know your burning zombies! I told a friend who had been playing the game a few weeks already about the R-Stick aiming over-ride and it blew his mind. Works like a charm...
Reply
Yep, you know your burning zombies! I told a friend who had been playing the game a few weeks already about the R-Stick aiming over-ride and it blew his mind. Works like a charm...
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 3:39PM (Unverified) said
Sounds good to me if it means getting more PSN games.
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 3:40PM Brett from Atlanta said
This is a fantastic idea, good to see this kind of approach to help devs make better games.
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 3:44PM KwietStorm said
I haven't played it yet. Is there a demo? Online multiplayer?
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:50PM (Unverified) said
I responded to your comment, but it just went ahead and made it a new comment instead. Answers below... :S
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:26PM (Unverified) said
I hear you. I held off for several weeks on it and finally went ahead and gave in. I'm so glad I did. It's just as good as you might expect it would be...
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:23PM (Unverified) said
"Burn Zombie Burn" is the best downloadable game I've played since "The Last Guy." So. Much. Fun.
If you have a PS3, you need to download this game. Period.
Reply
If you have a PS3, you need to download this game. Period.
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:41PM (Unverified) said
Nope, the Pixeljunk series doesn't do anything for me even in the least. None of them.
My favorite PSN games:
Flower
Flow
Burn Zombie Burn
The Last Guy
Echochrome
Lumines Supernova
SSF2HDTR
1942
Commando 3
Reply
My favorite PSN games:
Flower
Flow
Burn Zombie Burn
The Last Guy
Echochrome
Lumines Supernova
SSF2HDTR
1942
Commando 3
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:35PM Nobledevil Gaming Optimist said
It's nice to hear that Sony's idea for exclusivity worked out. It's better to hear that due to their investment, the game has to be quite good to get Sony's money, which will result in a growing library of bad-assery from PSN.
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:46PM (Unverified) said
No demo, but if you have any idea of what this game is about and are at all interested in it, you won't regret the purchase. Unfortunately there is no online multiplayer, but that is the only feature missing. Trophies, offline multi, and plenty of challenge modes and the like are present and accounted for.
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 4:47PM (Unverified) said
Whoops... that was for @KwietStorm. Page loading is screwy today...
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 5:02PM Petebot330 said
It's funny, almost all of the games I wish the 360 had are PSN titles...
Reply
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 7:02PM MyAbsolution said
i want this game on xbla...
so i guess thats not happening?
They could very well make even more money since im sure the market for this game is bigger on XBLA.
Reply
so i guess thats not happening?
They could very well make even more money since im sure the market for this game is bigger on XBLA.
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 7:32PM Blkant said
No its not, just like the majority of good titles this year. Get used to it and stop asking about "I guess this isn't coming either" or "they would make more money on xbrick". There is a reason people are choosing to develop on the PS3 lately, because while in the microsoft universe money is all that maters, however, a quality game is the larger focus in ours. I think sony's old saying applies well here. Live in your world (of money and greed), and we'll play in ours. :P
It really shouldn't be, but that was really satisfying :D
Reply
It really shouldn't be, but that was really satisfying :D
Posted: Apr 21st 2009 7:52PM 8bitartist said
drunkraba: this game would NOT be bigger on the Wii.
Reply
Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 5:06AM MyAbsolution said
Thanks for the fanboy response Blkant.
All I was saying was that I would like to play the game, and that indeed there are far more American 360s than Ps3s, so the potential for more money is there.
And "quality" is mostly about tastes. 360 has lots of it, so does Ps3.
Reply
All I was saying was that I would like to play the game, and that indeed there are far more American 360s than Ps3s, so the potential for more money is there.
And "quality" is mostly about tastes. 360 has lots of it, so does Ps3.
Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 6:22AM ottoman673 said
So in other words, Sony's price matching for developing and marketing?
...how is that not paying for an exclusive?
I think it's definitely fair to say that you PS3 fanboys can STFU about exclusive DLC on the 360 when you guys get WHOLE GAMES cause Sony wants to shell out the cash for them.
Reply
...how is that not paying for an exclusive?
I think it's definitely fair to say that you PS3 fanboys can STFU about exclusive DLC on the 360 when you guys get WHOLE GAMES cause Sony wants to shell out the cash for them.
Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 10:04AM (Unverified) said
I personally never said Sony doesn't pay for exclusives, but I do think the main difference between them is; What Sony pays for is quality, and encourages new game designs/ideas.
Compared to Microsoft just chucking cash at anything to try and say it has more stuff.
Reply
Compared to Microsoft just chucking cash at anything to try and say it has more stuff.
Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 1:13AM Angry Frank said
No, they're putting donation cups in pubs to help them make up for last year's operating losses.
Reply
Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 7:32AM PoisonedAl said
Okay, it was a crap joke, but surely you could see it was A FUCKING JOKE? Jesus.
Reply
Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 6:02PM ottoman673 said
So exclusive DLC for GTA IV isn't considered quality?
How about Braid? That was a 360/PC exclusive and it was a new idea.
I will admit, i'm jealous of Burn Zombie Burn and Warhawk, but really, what else is there?
Noby Noby Boy is an abstract idea more than it is a game.. so are Flower, PixelJunk Eden, and a couple others...
Reply
How about Braid? That was a 360/PC exclusive and it was a new idea.
I will admit, i'm jealous of Burn Zombie Burn and Warhawk, but really, what else is there?
Noby Noby Boy is an abstract idea more than it is a game.. so are Flower, PixelJunk Eden, and a couple others...
Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 8:06PM (Unverified) said
The difference - at least to me - is between putting your exclusivity money to work promoting unique and interesting games like BZB, Warhawk, LBP, Pixeljunk (all of them), etc. versus spending your money on trying to buy exclusivity for big name titles, or even worse DLC.
I don't know if MS paid for Braid exclusivity. If they did - then good for them, because that's exactly the kind of games you should help promote on your console. But buying 1 year exclusivity deals on eg Bioshock, or buying exclusive DLC for a game (like Fallout 3), is just pissing on the face of gamers waiting to play those games. I'm frankly most surprised that any company are dumb enough to take such a deal. It certainly assures my money isn't spent on their products - now or ever in the future.
But developing new and exiting titles and ideas - now that's an idea I can get behind no matter who does it. Then the money is actually well spent on giving the gaming community brilliant games we might not otherwise have gotten. Exclusivity is a fair return on that.
Reply
I don't know if MS paid for Braid exclusivity. If they did - then good for them, because that's exactly the kind of games you should help promote on your console. But buying 1 year exclusivity deals on eg Bioshock, or buying exclusive DLC for a game (like Fallout 3), is just pissing on the face of gamers waiting to play those games. I'm frankly most surprised that any company are dumb enough to take such a deal. It certainly assures my money isn't spent on their products - now or ever in the future.
But developing new and exiting titles and ideas - now that's an idea I can get behind no matter who does it. Then the money is actually well spent on giving the gaming community brilliant games we might not otherwise have gotten. Exclusivity is a fair return on that.
Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 10:32PM (Unverified) said
PlayStation is to QUALITY as XBox is to QUANTITY
tomo
Reply
tomo
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments











