| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (31)

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:06PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i would like to see console versions of spore. and the sims 3. pwease?
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:08PM Jerkamie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your nuts if you wanna play these games with your game pad.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:13PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ps3 has keyboard and mouse support, actually.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio

Or you can play it in your PC or Mac.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:32PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nah my specs aren't good enough... well, they might be cause i bought a brand new lappy but still. call me crazy, but i prefer console gaming. and when i did try games, my computer slowed down BAD haha.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:32PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
my old one, that is.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 12:43AM Averna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think that one of the requirements for games is to use the lowest common denominator. Not everyone has a keyboard/mouse (I'm sure they do, but not on the PS3).

I remember this discussion with Unreal3. They said they didn't want to give anyone an advantage. I dunno, I think games should at least have the option there, but I wouldn't expect this to happen anytime soon.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 1:52AM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Spore and The Sims 3 were made to support slow computers. Your computer must be as old as the PS2 if it can't handle those games.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 1:52AM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Er, meant The Sims 2. The Sims 3 will be more system intensive as it's an open world game.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 10:10AM AntiVillian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
keyboards and mice can be bout for any console, who would do it though?

The wii's pointer could make a sims game possible.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:07PM Jerkamie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why bother? Spore was a huge disappointment.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He's sharing the same look of disappointment as well.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Spore was awful, so don't bother please.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
off with his fucking head!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Do Not Want

Reinstalled it when I got my new rig last month and I played for like twenty minutes and haven't touched it since. Biggest gaming letdown so far of the 21st century.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. I'm not even sure if you can even call it a game it was so pointless. If it is one, then it's by far the most shallow and pointless game I've ever played. I'm just glad I didn't buy it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:45PM BananaBoat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I agree wholeheartedly. I was so disappointed, and so glad that I elected to play it at a friends house instead of buying it. Thank you Securom, for helping me avoid a terrible game.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 5:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Apparently you haven't played Empire: Total War then.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:33PM Deezul AwT said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I didn't play Spore, so I can't comment on the gameplay. But when you have a game that's in devolopment for several years, gets lots of press about how it will be great, due to previous work, and then it comes out and it doesn't impress? People start wondering what the hype was and why the delay.

Any old PC gamers remember Chris Roberts and the Wing Commander games? They were great. So he tried Strike Commander - similar game style, but a different "take" on the genre. It had several delays, and when it came out, it also didn't impress. Duke Nukem Forever is going to have to give everyone an orgasm every time the play, or people will slam it.

I for one am not interested in Spore. The game came out last year, and it was not a big hit. Three or four months after its release, and it was dead.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Spore was a technical masterpiece and a gameplay flop.

Honestly, I'm not sure I'm still interested in what Will Wright is doing anymore.

He seems far more interested in building virtual worlds; or rather, creating the tools that let people build their virtual worlds-- but not actually putting a ton of thought into gameplay.

There's nothing wrong with giving people creative toys-- I love me some legos-- but they're not games.

If he were working on the creative tools behind map-maker programs, that would be incredible. If he were working on the design tools for a "[Genre] Maker" game, that would be stupendous. As a game designer, though, he's not very good at making experiences that are consistently fun.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 12:49AM Averna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I kind of got the impression, at least with some of the earlier interviews with Will, that Spore was an experiment with procedural programming. I was excited with the concept and less excited about the game that it was connected to.

With any luck he will move the lessons learned into something else, even The Sims4 would work well and give the user a lot more control without having to bust out the content creation tools.

I think the Sims 2 had the first touch of his concept when two sims had a baby, it was meant to combine the 'dna' of those sims and spit out a kid with features from parents.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:48PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Still-EA shill and enormously disappointing wuss developer Will Wright."
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
:D Yay for Willy! "WE FREED HIM!"
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2009 11:58PM rTwelve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just want a realistic SimCity. Like, intensely realistic. The opposite of casual—I might almost need a degree to play. I already learned way too much about budgeting and taxes from those games as it is.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 4:28AM Birth Canal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Isn't the point of the Sims games is to escape reality? Isn't that the reason we play video games in general? So no, leave the virtual world and the real world separate.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 6:30AM AntiVillian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What? you are saying he is not allowed to like what he likes? thats awful.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 12:27PM rTwelve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sims != SimCity
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 1:29AM mario83 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
arrg im so sick of will wrights crap, why cant we take him into a small room and remove the door (ie what i do to my sims when i get bored with them or they dont do what i want to do!)
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 1:37AM wshwe said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Spore is a failure. Next game.
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 8:35AM Skytwin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Spore was pants imo. It had potential but the flow of the game was completely wrong and fragmented that the fun was sucked away.

Releasing on consoles would be a mistake if you ask me. A majority of people who wanted to play it played the PC version. Many didn't like what they saw. What's the chances of them buying it?

Now, Sim 3. I'd like to see that on a console (or Fantasy World Dizzy for that matter but thats a different story).
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2009 9:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no thanks dont want Bore *Eh hem* i mean spore on my ps3
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW