| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (37)

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:17PM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Who shot who in the what now?
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:27PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BLAST!!!

You beat me to it...

I was SOOOOO gonna say that
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 8:34PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good god! Everytime I make that exact reference no one knows what I'm talking about. I was beginning to think I was alone...all alone.

Thank you sir, you've renewed my faith in humanity.

[+]
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:22PM AsherR said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Okay. I'm not going to be able to get that picture out of my head now, Justin. That picture being one of a pantsless Matlock....

Duck feathers!


So many of these lawsuits are frivolous, but some seem to have merit. No idea where this one falls right now. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:24PM Giroro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lol @ Matlock
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:25PM Giroro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When did the Dualshock come out? Patents only last for 14 years . . .
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 7:09PM floating coffins said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Twenty not fourteen.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Matlock twice in one day is epic.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:30PM Swizzler said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wait... didn't nintendo invent rumble response? i'm so confused...
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Different kind of rumble technology.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 9:04PM Extinction said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo didnt invent any of the thinhs ppl tend to credit them with
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 9:36PM Swizzler said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
fanboy alert, fanboy alert!!! oh noes! Nintendo is a copycat! YES! it was NINTENDO that betrayed Sony with their contract to co-author a CD-run consloe, because Nintendo came out with the first CD-run console, not Sony, no, Nintendo totally stole it and called it the playstation, while sony was stuck with the N64 :(

and then when Nintendo went to Sony to ask for help making a controller, Nintendo totally stole the plans and the credit and named it the DualShock, and they haven't changed the controller since. Totally, Nintendo never made ANYTHING.
Reply

Posted: Apr 24th 2009 2:50AM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pretty sure the Sega CD came out before sony even thunk the word "playstation"
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:35PM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...so the whole point of this guy complaining is that he didn't make as much money off of a multi-billion dollar company than he could have?

Sorry buddy, but that's just a simple case of wrong place and wrong time. Stop whining.
Reply

Posted: Apr 24th 2009 3:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yep and we can only hope Sony will counter sue and take him down for price fixing and biased licensing practices.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:35PM Rhamsey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Objection!!!!
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:36PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I only ever watched one episode of Matlock. I had woken up early to watch Batman TAS, but it was too early, and Matlock was on. I had no idea what was going on, I couldnt only watch in confusion as I tried to figure out what this gray suited gentleman had done to Batman
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:36PM skrutop said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hate it when it gets into summer months...just not a lot to report on.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:44PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it's April, and May isn't summer either
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:48PM Dirty said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yea dude, if your bored in april your kinda fucked.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:44PM Pure Black World Tendency said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
EVER WANTED TO KNOW THE HISTORY OF THE VIBRATOR?

The first mechanical vibrator was invented in the 1880's by a British
physician as a way to more quickly and effectively perform a "therapeutic
massage." Starting in the first century A.D., doctors manually massaged
women to orgasm in hopes of purging them of a mysterious illness. The
vibrator was invented as a way to get the job done more quickly and therefore
allowing the doctor time to see more patients.

What, you must ask, were esteemed physicians doing with their vibrators?
They were treating hysteria, the most common health complaint among women
of the day. While the existence of hysteria as a disease was debunked in
the 1950¹s, medical experts from the time of Hippocrates up to the 20th
century believed that hysteria expressed the womb¹s revolt against sexual
deprivation. A woman's display of mental or emotional distress was a clear
indication of her need for sexual release. Genital massage was a standard
treatment for hysteria; its objective was to induce "hysterical paroxysm"
(better known as orgasm) in the patient. Obviously such treatment demanded
both manual dexterity and a fair amount of time, so turn of the century
physicians were delighted with the efficiency, convenience and reliability
of portable vibrators.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 7:32PM Knight Marquise said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While it's interesting, to say the least, what the hell does that have to do with this story????
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 8:55PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The internet knows all!
Reply

Posted: Apr 24th 2009 2:51AM Courtney said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Perhaps the point is that rumble "technology" has been around since the 1880s.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 6:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dealing with corporations without an attorney for protection is just asking for trouble.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 7:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. People are too busy hating lawyers to remember about the other 50% of lawyers that are trying to protect people like this.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 7:10PM exaltedbladder said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
its his own damn fault.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 8:00PM DigitalTwisted said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No sympathy for the guy at all, Sony don't have to announce to the world if they team up with someone.

For example my friend HATES Pepsi and has proclaimed for years that anything made by Pepsico is evil and he will never purchase that product.....

He eats Quaker Oats every day for breakfast.....any idea who owns Quaker Oats?.....
Reply

Posted: Apr 24th 2009 7:37AM Morisato said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lolz, wonder what he will do when he finds out the truth? XD
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 8:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MBO hit the nail on the head.

Assuming this information is entirely correct, PDP/Electro Source is under no obligation to inform him of their other business proceedings (in fact, there are many instances where this actually is illegal).

This case has no ground, unless somewhere in his licensing agreement with PDP/ES he is given specific rights to approve/disprove of business proceedings dealing with his patent.

I usually like David v. Golaith law stories (Scratch, LLC v. Activision made me cry I was so over-joyed), here though this looks like a guy who is just being a dick because he didn't get all the money he could have.

Welcome to the world of business Mr. Thorner, you have to live with the deals you make, and make those deals with the information you have.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 8:07PM warmonk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmm. It really depends on what's going on in their licensing agreement. If he's lucky he'll have a clause about the license being renegotiated in cases of merger.
Reply

Posted: Apr 24th 2009 10:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I CALL SHENANIGANS!!
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 8:36PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're lucky your spamming was about making chicks orgasm with vibrators, otherwise your (confusing) upvotes would be down.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 8:38PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Son of a bitch! Joystiq, still with quote issues? This was a reply to Great Golem+'s unusual post.
Reply

Posted: Apr 23rd 2009 9:33PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The sap went ahead without any legal advice? There's a reason people are paid good money in the legal field. I'm sure he's butt-hurt, but it's his own fault.
Reply

Posted: Apr 24th 2009 4:06AM lookhappy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like he shoulda done some research on the companies he was dealing with before agreeing anything.
Reply

Posted: Apr 24th 2009 8:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MAAAAATTTLOCCK! xD
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW