Earlier this month, Activision and Gibson Guitar Corporation (the guitar manufacturer) settled the year-old litigation over a patent dispute, according to court documents obtained by Gamastura. With all the lawsuits we've been writing about recently, you'd think we'd see more posts like this every once in a while, right?
The terms of the settlement haven't been released as of yet and we've requested comment from both companies. Confusing the situation even more is Gibson's recent loss in ... umm ... another case with the publisher, we suppose? Perhaps the two companies will explain.
Activision remains engaged on another music/rhythm game front with Genius Products ... via 7 Studios, its development studio, over Scratch: The Ultimate DJ. Like us, you'll just have to wait patiently until the tantalizing results of that lawsuit come to light.
Reader Comments (17)
Posted: Apr 25th 2009 9:39PM (Unverified) said
Does this mean we're back to real Gibson guitars in Guitar Hero games? Not that the create-a-guitar mode isn't cool, but maybe they could just implement it with real Gibson equipment and stuff now.
Ironically, my World Tour guitar was a replica Telecaster. >_>
Reply
Ironically, my World Tour guitar was a replica Telecaster. >_>
Posted: Apr 25th 2009 10:28PM (Unverified) said
Getting kinda tired of the law/lawsuit updates lately...
Reply
Posted: Apr 26th 2009 1:24AM (Unverified) said
I really detest Guitar Hero; though I feel that I'm the only gamer that does.
Anyone else out there annoyed by it?
Also, fucking Americans. Sue over everything.
http://videogamejunkies1.blogspot.com/
Reply
Anyone else out there annoyed by it?
Also, fucking Americans. Sue over everything.
http://videogamejunkies1.blogspot.com/
Posted: Apr 26th 2009 4:46AM (Unverified) said
Hate's a touch strong.
I just don't like it, don't hate it.
And Americans do sue over everything; we have something like twice the lawsuits per capita of an average European country.
Reply
I just don't like it, don't hate it.
And Americans do sue over everything; we have something like twice the lawsuits per capita of an average European country.
Posted: Apr 26th 2009 5:43AM Bowser Rogozhin said
Form 696 is used by the London Metropolitan Police to monitor which artists perform at which establishments. If the venue owner doesn't fill in the form a fortnight before the scheduled event they could face a substantial fine, suspension of their license, or even, in the most extreme cases, be shut down.
Many believe this is merely the state intruding on personal freedoms, especially due to the fact that scrupulous information is often required: name, age, type of music, ethnicity of expected fans. It is not known what the Met does with this base information once the event has passed.
Many other European police forces are also looking into applying this level of surveillance in their own cities.
Jeffery, I think we have bigger problems to deal with than a bunch of Americans suing each other. Our police are murdering the innocent and you're worried about laws half way across the world. Where's your sense of location, man? Your priorities? We're dying out here.
Reply
Many believe this is merely the state intruding on personal freedoms, especially due to the fact that scrupulous information is often required: name, age, type of music, ethnicity of expected fans. It is not known what the Met does with this base information once the event has passed.
Many other European police forces are also looking into applying this level of surveillance in their own cities.
Jeffery, I think we have bigger problems to deal with than a bunch of Americans suing each other. Our police are murdering the innocent and you're worried about laws half way across the world. Where's your sense of location, man? Your priorities? We're dying out here.
Posted: Apr 26th 2009 5:46AM Bowser Rogozhin said
Oh, putting Mario RPG in your top ten Mario games instantly makes your blog the scuff of the wind.
Reply
Posted: Apr 26th 2009 6:06AM (Unverified) said
I'm not actually worried, more a failed attempt at humor.
I'm surprised at your zeal about the artist thing, but respect it.
I'm not sure if I'd put it in my top ten worries for the future.
Best,
Jeff
Reply
I'm surprised at your zeal about the artist thing, but respect it.
I'm not sure if I'd put it in my top ten worries for the future.
Best,
Jeff
Posted: Apr 26th 2009 6:25AM (Unverified) said
Know the feeling.
No worries.
And I think anger is good; higher state of conciousness than apathy.
Reply
No worries.
And I think anger is good; higher state of conciousness than apathy.
Posted: Apr 26th 2009 4:17PM (Unverified) said
I'm not going to keep expounding on this, because I hate arguing over everything.
A legitimate claim over intellectual property I'm all for.
But, in America, at least, there are plenty of illegitimate ones that are complete bullshit, and obviously such.
Further, American judges are very hesitant to award attorney's fees to those who bring these BS charges, which would ease the problem. (For instance, when the original George Kostanza sued Seinfeld the judge forced him to pay for Seinfeld's attorneys).
Since this is in the judge's power, he should do so for things that are obviously bogus, in my opinion.
It would save bogus lawsuits like this.
And there are plenty of Americans who don't sue over every little thing; in fact, I think it's more a problem with the American legal system than with Americans themselves.
But, yes, a legitimate claim to intellectual property should be taken to court. I don't think this is legitimate.
Maybe others disagree.
Best,
Jeff
Reply
A legitimate claim over intellectual property I'm all for.
But, in America, at least, there are plenty of illegitimate ones that are complete bullshit, and obviously such.
Further, American judges are very hesitant to award attorney's fees to those who bring these BS charges, which would ease the problem. (For instance, when the original George Kostanza sued Seinfeld the judge forced him to pay for Seinfeld's attorneys).
Since this is in the judge's power, he should do so for things that are obviously bogus, in my opinion.
It would save bogus lawsuits like this.
And there are plenty of Americans who don't sue over every little thing; in fact, I think it's more a problem with the American legal system than with Americans themselves.
But, yes, a legitimate claim to intellectual property should be taken to court. I don't think this is legitimate.
Maybe others disagree.
Best,
Jeff
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments









