| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (68)

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 10:43PM smcn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
640k should be enough for anybody.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 10:58PM The Blank Mage Returns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, I hadn't thought of that. It'd still work for collections, though. Having the entirety of a series on a single disc sounds pretty good to me.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 11:24PM jhowlett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
having an entire collection on on disc seems great till you go to play disc 2 of arrested development and it won't work. i'm hoping for more durability as well as capacity
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 11:29PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
back in the days of the PSX we said
"theres no way we will fill an entire CD" then SE did it with FFVII

when i was just a kid i was pretty badass when i put a 6.7 GB HDD into my computer as a slave for saving extra files.

i remember when 64 ram was huge.

trust me guys, we will fill that shit up in a few years.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 11:44PM WhiteTreeWolf said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The entire space won't be used for linear data. Even Blu-Ray uses redundant data to speed up load times. Even then this won't be used for games for a VERY long time.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2009 9:07AM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"there's no way anyone's going to use all of it in a game"

What a shortsighted statement. smcn's comment is very apt. It's ridiculous to say, "oh, they'll never use x." The only thing that will save games from growing that big is better compression schemes, but as the discs get cheaper there will be less incentive to compress. Just look at games that get close to filling BluRay. They could probably be compressed to ~15GBs, but why worry about it?

"making 500 gbs of gameplay is not cost-effective"

Making a game that was 1GB was not cost effective 15 years ago. Making a game that was more than 5GB was not cost effective 5 years ago.

Someday in the future, there will be games that big. They'll be flash drives with 500GB. They'll be harddrives with 10 terabytes. It will happen.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 10:32PM OremLK said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$0.10/gb is pretty good--that's about what platter-based hard drives are going for these days.

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 10:43PM ChrisAre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think SOMEONE hit the "Joystiq" button when he meant to hit the "Engadget" button... Griffin, I'm lookin' at you buddy.

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 10:57PM The Blank Mage Returns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One step closer to Ghost in the Shell, baby, YEAH!

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 11:07PM s ls said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes!!! my future wifey!

My avatar switches between Sackboy and Hayley Williams. i have no idea why? I tried to permanently change it to my Hayley Williams but Joystiq is silly like that.

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 11:08PM s ls said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
response to my original comment and to dark_inchworm (on Steam!) dark inchworm (on XBL!)
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 11:31PM ColorblindMonk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One step closer to building a Death Star... yes... yes... *evil plotting*

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 11:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't care if they stuck 500 EXABYTES on a chip the size of my pinky nail that works in every electronic storage device known to man.

GE can fuck themselves, until they decide to get out of governmental affairs, and quit taking over American media companies.

Posted: Apr 28th 2009 12:07AM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Am I the only one in this world tired of loud disk drives and fragile disks that can be rendered worthless by dropping them at the wrong time?

Flash media is where its at...

Posted: Apr 28th 2009 9:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly...I really expect to see a switch back to cartridge gaming with the cheapness and storage capacity of flash memory. Right now, a 32 GB CF card runs around $80 or so. In 3-4 years, that will drop considerably. Add to it a custom form factor would help prevent piracy, and you've got something pretty close to Blu-Ray capacity with much higher transfer speeds and no moving parts.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2009 12:39AM Lekko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"about 100 times the size of a standard DVD -- and still be readable"

Yeah, would be kinda pointless if you could write all that data to the disc and not read any of it.

Posted: Apr 28th 2009 7:52AM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Blu-ray is dead (seriously, maybe).

Posted: Apr 28th 2009 2:07PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks like I'm gonna have to buy the White Album again...

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW