| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (72)

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:08PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Co-op...the ONE thing that people kept saying Uncharted to could have had. Looks like they have pulled it off nicely. Can't wait to get my hands on this come Fall....
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:29PM Birth Canal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Weren't you one of those people ready to boycott the game because it has co-op and multiplayer? Eating your words now I see...
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 5:28PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ummmmmmm never said anything about boycotting dude.....

Just said I hope they dont fuck it up......
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:09PM Marius said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So is this split-screen or online co-op?
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:44PM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Apparently online only. =(
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Crap! No splitscreen? My fiancee and I play games all the time, but there just isn't enough local multiplayer games that suit both our tastes. Uncharted would have been one of those games we played together, but I guess it's going to be a controller passing affair once again (She takes care of platforming and I do the combat).
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:18PM Hyams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah. More games need splitscreen. Online seems to have largely replaced it this gen, though. =(
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:29PM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Online only co-op is bullshit. Unless it's a game like GTA, Halo, CoD4 that everyone owns, it's rare that anyone on my friends list is ever playing the game that I am at the same time.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:36PM Troy Powers said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
True. I SO miss split-screen play. But, if there's a price drop this summer, I would be seriously tempted to buy a second PS3.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:03PM Wozamil said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I have the second PS3, it's the second game copy that kills me.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:07PM Troy Powers said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hadn't thought of that. DOH!!!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 3:35PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I too wish this had split screen coop. I like to play video games with my wife, but hate the idea of having to get a second copy of the game and another PS3 to do it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 5:17PM Hedgeson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you have 2 PS3s, rent one copy to try the coop.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 11:54PM SoCoolCurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yea i hate that games don't have split screen anymore. i used to go over to my friends house and we would play co-op games (actually got me into the FPS genre) but now i have to lug my PS3 or 360 over to his house and play on his crappy old second TV in order to play co-op in most cases. every now and then, a game like Gears or Army of Two comes along where co-op is the focus or at least a main part and we have TONS of fun with those (we just recently tackled the RE5 co-op).
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow that all sounds great. I hope I can play split screen with two players.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
MIND = Blown
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:25PM Blkant said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Call me a PS3 fanboy and I'll take pride in that now. But I simply must ask, what excuse is there not to own a PS3 now?
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
true... GOTY i think, if not god of war 3 or killzone 2 /which is also PS3 exclusives!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:34PM shadowhowl1900 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
GOTY? dude we arent we done the year, so how can there be a GOTY nominee yet. plus GoW3 is prob coming next year. they (Sony rep.) said by 2010 Q1.
Also there are a lot more games coming like bioshock 2.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:35PM JuanLovesHorror said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Fanboyism pride;)
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:42PM Anticrawl said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
The price? Doesn't matter though because I own one. Game looks good, may buy.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
yea, i wrote IF NOT god of war 3.. because it may not be out this year..
and who cares if it not actually gets to be GOTY, it may be, dont ruin this awesome moment!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:34PM Troy Powers said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sweet bejeebus! If you don't own a playstation at this point...I feel sorry for you. I'm with you, Blkant. I'm not trying to unleash the fanboyism here, but...PS3's exclusives are looking fucking awesome!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 4:31PM ummhello said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
actually, I think everyone should have all 3 systems--all of them have their merits and excellent exclusive titles....
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:31PM shadowhowl1900 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
is it only online co-op or can i have friend beside me playing at the same. Also can it also be a combination. 2 people with me and 1 online.
Also for this to be fully successful, i hope they implement some sort of profile system. I mean i dont want to keep repeating the same mission with offline coop.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:32PM unboring said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
game of the year
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Rather than shoehorn a second player into an experience already crafted for solo adventure, it's creating a separate side mission designed specifically with two to three players in mind."

Just the way it should be done imo. Co-op won't affect the single player experience and vice-versa.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:50PM hobbykitjr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ala shitstorm RE5.
Resistance 1 worked because there was no partner AI if you played alone. RE5 does not work if you want to play alone. R2 doesn't really have co-op in the traditional sense. You can't even really play it offline.
If its possible (w/o screwing the story which is a big part of uncharted thankfully) I prefer R1 co-op.
If not this Uncharted 2/Resistance 2 co-op is better
RE5 should never be used, as Yahtzee said "its really bad when you're running away and more afraid of your AI Partner then the zombies"
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:08PM Professor Lario said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gears 1 and 2, Crackdown, Saint's Row 2, Rainbow Six: Vegas 1 and 2, etc were better because of the inclusion of co-op in the main campaign. I am not saying all games that do campaign co-op are better, but imo the games listed above were better for it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:48PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The way they're doing coop for Uncharted seems like another good solution. On the other hand, I'm pretty tired of designers not wanting to include coop because they can't fit it into the storyline. Some of the most fun we've had in coop was with Halo 1, remember? They didn't bother changing the story or explaining why there's two Spartans. It didn't make sense and no one cared because it was so much fun.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Still don't think this was necessary at all, and I'll definitely be skipping it should I choose to buy Uncharted 2. I just hope they don't put online trophies in.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:29PM mahouneko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They will probably activate the trophies set once the game ships. I mean, they waited this long just to drop the bomb that Uncharted 2 has multiplayer, and multiplayer that is apparently very good from Joystiq's impression, so I don't see a reason why they wouldn't have implemented trophies, especially online trophies.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:35PM Birth Canal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why are you complaining. The game will cost $60 and I don't understand why you don't want more content. You are either bluffing about wanting the game or you are just weird. How can you not want the most bang for your buck? Joystiq said the single player and the co-op are both high quality work. Please explain...

And oh, if you think I'm a fanboy, I also own an Xbox360. If you need proof, I'll give you my gamertag.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Because I don't need another freakin game with deathmatch and co-op. Why do people need to play deathmatch in every single game?
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 3:06PM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you don't want to play a deathmatch, then don't play it. It WILL have online trophies, of course, but if you don't like playing it, then don't, so stop complaining.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2009 3:02AM Birth Canal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why do you care? No one is forcing you to play death match or co-op. It's there for those who do care and if you don't then don play. Simple as that. Some people will complain about nothing.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:39PM JuanLovesHorror said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Dam those screens look crazy sick; I can't believe we have a automatic GOTY so early into the year.I will step up and say that Naughty Dog are one of the best developers of all time.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:37PM Birth Canal said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So say we all!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:42PM Inspace2020 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm very very very siked for this game...Loved UC:Drakes Fortune, pretty sure I'm going to love this one as well!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:43PM Jake5678 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I really hope this is split-screen as well...! There's nothing like killing virtual bad guys with your friend sitting in the same couch.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 12:46PM jhowlett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so far it seems good. i like the way they separated the co-op like resistance 2.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:40PM Birth Canal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Except Resistance 2 had a sucky single player but an amazing multiplayer. Both modes in Uncharted 3 seem like they be equally good.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:40PM Birth Canal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Woops! *2*
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This takes Uncharted even more on the shooter path, witch for those of you o want another shooter is not a bad thing and it could be another great shooter but for me just have to keep relying on Lara Croft for the only action adventure explore game, witch I love, but which more games would follow.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:50PM Birth Canal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The first Lara Croft game on next-gen console was good. Then the latest one wasn't as good. Personally, I think Lara Croft is past her prime. The game looks good but there are so many problems with the gameplay that I couldn't play it more than 30 minutes.

About Uncharted 2 becoming more of a shooter, how so? Elements from the single player mode like platforming, melaing, and cover are incorporated into the multiplayer mode. Basically, it's like fighting bad guys from the single player mode except the baddies are being controlled by real humans. Does make sense.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 2:52PM Birth Canal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Man, I can't type today! :0 *meleeing*
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They truly are Naughty Gods!
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:16PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damnit, I was so happy when I heard co-op, but so disappointed to read that it's one of those silly "side-story" things.

I don't know why developers feel like the co-op part of a game has to be explained in the story to include it. If you want, just leave the story and cutscenes exactly the way they were and when it flips back to the game have two characters there instead of one, no biggie.

A campaign doesn't have to be designed specifically for co-op to have co-op, just give us the option.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:22PM Hyams said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's fine for out and out shooters, but not so much for games with more of a focus on platforming and exploration and puzzle solving.

The co-op levels are basically all the sections from the single player game that ND think would work with co-op play (with a few tweeks, of course). It's not hard to extrapolate that the parts not included wouldn't work with two or three players, for whatever reason.
Reply

Posted: Apr 27th 2009 1:33PM NightElve said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I completely disagree with you and I'm very pleased Naughty Dog went this way. You see first Uncharted was a unique solo experience, gladly they didn't take the RE5 route.

As Fernando said in a previous post there's people that likes to play a solo game and they are not so much into multiplayer stuff, well I'm one of those persons I rather have a unique solo experience than a game that I need to play with someone else to fully enjoy.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW