| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (117)

Posted: May 5th 2009 8:14AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While I thought the video looked cool, there's absolutely no way you could move the sword like that. Here's hoping that this isn't the first game all over again where the trailer is impressive but the actual gameplay isn't.

Posted: May 5th 2009 8:23AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
However if motion plus controls do allow you to do all the things in that promo, then it's a definite buy.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2009 8:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Wii's hardware frame buffer is the limitation to going higher than 480p.
For it's size, it can hold a 1024x768 image in 16bit color. I believe the Wii's Opera browser renders in 1024x600 then downscales to the final 16x9 480p ratio.

What I think this video is using is full-screen anti-aliasing. It bleeds the color on edges where 2 different colors exist. It used cell-shading and FSAA so it looks better than 480p... Movies use full-screen anti-aliasing and that's why movies (DVD's) look great for 480p. Color-bleeding happens naturally with video cameras. With games it has to be programmed in.

Posted: May 5th 2009 9:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also, the Wii's gpu is internall 3x faster than the GC's.
You rarely have framerate issues with the Wii.
Infact, playing a game with framerate issues on the GC on Wii hardware (such as running up the middle in Madden '05 on the GC) is perfectly smoothe on the Wii in GC mode because they don't slow down the gpu, only the cpu to go to GC mode.

Posted: May 5th 2009 9:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Like everyone else has said, it looks really good, but we've been lied to before by ubisoft with things like this. Bring on E3 and some gameplay footage!

Also if this game does look close to what we are seeing, then we may have a developer besides Factor 5 and High Voltage Software that knows how to deal with TEV pipelining http://revoeyes.blogspot.com/2007/07/wii-has-more-power-than-you-think.html

And the fact that it looks like trigun just makes me want it more.

Posted: May 5th 2009 9:21AM Mr Fister said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't seen the video yet, but that "Destination Playstation" line has me worried. Surely they wouldn't port this game over to other systems, would they? The Wii needs all the third-party exclusives it can get right now, especially considering the effort Ubisoft appears to be putting into this title.

Posted: May 5th 2009 9:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Urgh, I hate Wii commercials/trailers like this. When was it filmed, 2006? They're just so cringey and fake. Though no doubt everyone will be fooled into thinking it looks "immersive". Does anyone actually play Wii games like this? Not in my experience, yet they're still trying to push this sort of image. So he's going to play a 20-30 hour adventure like that? Flailing around his living room like an idiot? He looks like he's playing along to some stupid exercise/aerobics DVD or something, not enjoying playing a video game.

Posted: May 5th 2009 11:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Any and every time I play Wii Sports Tennis I always play standing up. And in other games, like FPS, I find myself leaning forward on the edge of my chair while playing, leaning as I look around corners, etc. For a lot of the people that ENJOY the Wii, there is much more of an immersion factor than in games with just a button.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2009 11:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I find button controls (ie. those of a traditional SNES-style controller) far more immersive as they're fun, comfortable, relaxing and actually work and I imagine you probably thought that too before Wii marketing told you otherwise. The feeling of any extra "immersion" from motion controls is mostly superficial and imagined. In fact having to do a motion in a game about five times before it actually works or having to shake the controller (annoying in itself) to perform an action on screen that has nothing to do with shaking (as seems to be often the case) is incredibly un-immersive.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2009 12:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So it basically has nothing whatsoever to do with the first game other than the fact that they're calling Red Steel and there's swords and guns?

This is exactly what this game needed to be.

Posted: May 5th 2009 12:48PM cactus4million said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Has the wii myth become fact?

Posted: May 5th 2009 1:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And what might the Wii myth be, exactly?
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2009 1:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To paraphrase: It's all in your head

Well, that's what makes it a game. Kind of a "well, duh" moment, don't you think? If properly done motion control helps fool your mind into thinking the experience is better then it's done its job.

But no... it certainly hasn't *really* put you in control of something suddenly turned real. *palm on face*

Bill

Posted: May 5th 2009 2:22PM GoNinjaGo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At the end, when the guy is falling of the ledge his mask is breaking into pieces. That means he got SHOT IN THE FACE!!!

Posted: May 5th 2009 5:53PM BipolarMike said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this had BETTER be as good as it looks.

Posted: May 5th 2009 8:01PM Hiro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cowboys? Masked men? Cel-shaded graphics?
I mean that looked damned awesome, but are we sure this is Red Steel?

Posted: May 5th 2009 8:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Red steel is awesome and I play split screen a lot, excite truck is awesome and you can listen to music while playing. The launch games were more serious and less family oriented, don't ever let me hear any of you diss the good old days.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW