| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (11)

Posted: May 8th 2009 7:23PM FraGNeM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Duke Nukem Forever tried the infinity budget, and look where it got them.
Reply

Posted: May 8th 2009 7:33PM RudyHuxtable said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You beat me to it, and for that: +2
Reply

Posted: May 8th 2009 7:38PM Mike Knew said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It seems like Ken's always been a really clever developer, but Bioshock was the first time he was given the funding to fulfil his vision. I have no doubt that with similar backing he can do something just as incredible.
Reply

Posted: May 11th 2009 10:48PM MarioGreat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ken Levine has always been a notable developer. I still remember the first time I became aware of him: when, during an interview, he says unskippable cutscenes in games were akin to date rape. From then on, I was in love.

It's too bad the PC industry doesn't have developer relationships like Japanese gaming companies do. You hear of all the Japanese game companies and their great visionaries (Hironobu Sakaguchi, Shinji Mikami, Hideo Kojima, and etc), but you don't see that in the PC games industry. All of the well known people (Cliffy B, Peter Molyneux, Will Wright, etc) became well known because they were active in gaming events and opinionated to the point where they became controversial.

It's really a shame, in my opinion. If Ken Levine had the same status in Take-Two as Shigeru Miyamoto in Nintendo, I would bet we would see amazing games.
Reply

Posted: May 8th 2009 7:59PM Crusty Magic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ken is the man.

This video proves it: http://gamevideos.1up.com/video/id/21378
Reply

Posted: May 8th 2009 10:06PM chargen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So...

For what Bioshock, the graphically superior, otherwise inferior, "spiritual successor" to System Shock 2, cost

We could have had 25 System Shock 2's
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2009 3:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Minus inflation, hardware costs, increased pricing for the writing. Also, royalties. That's like saying we could have had 10 thousand Tetris's...
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2009 8:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"teris's" isn't a word... It would be Tetri. Learn Grammar.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2009 10:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is there any source out there that lists development costs for games that have come out? and i don't just mean big AAA games cuz those end up ballooning.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2009 6:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd have to say that's not a high number for game development (well, at least a blockbuster-type game). I don't know what the exact sales figures for the game, but even if it sold 5 million copies (a conservative estimate) at $60 that equals $300 million. But obviously you take out the budget, marketing and revenue sharing with retailers and misc. costs, that still would at least equal $200 million in profit. That's astounding.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2009 11:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also taxes to i think its 30-35% corporate tax on profits damn FICA,but yea it doesn't really sound like alot but yet it looked amazing. Even if games cost say 40-50 million to make and another 25mill for advertising they still have nuthing on films bcuz even sum smaller films could cost more then that. just sayin
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW