| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (87)

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:45AM floating coffins said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Should it be: Modern Warfare 2, Part 2?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 2:46PM ILL Thief said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
no...some people are saying it might be in Vietnam. I really don't know how that would be cause it'd still be close to modern warfare with a few of the same guns i think.

Treyarch should just make a zombie game based off WaW zombie mode. that'd be the great...they could make the campaign a lil l4d-ish but with perks an multiple guns an all that but the same type of running through locales like trying to get back to america or some crap lol btw..i thought WaW was a good game..all around
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At least each game has a 2 year production time.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:30PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So did W@W.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think I speak for everyone when I say that we're shocked by this revelation. We truly did not see this coming at all.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 4:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At least that cancerous company named Treyarch isn't developing it - OH WAIT.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:50AM MrVee PSN Vampah said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
20 years down the line:

Call of duty 25
&
Modern warfare 18

Featured on the
PS5
&
Xbox 9000
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:23PM Rhamsey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
damn, I'll still be waiting for the ps9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdh4TqWFfX4
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:38PM cbarrentos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
personally, i can't wait for "Call of Guitar Hero: THE MOVIE" Starring Tony Hawk and Weena Mercator as "The Hopping Woman"
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:46PM Ignatius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't forget Final Fantasy CDXLV
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:57PM Chris Smack said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think they'll call it the Xbox 9001 for instant free meme advertising
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 1:01PM Skruff said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Ignatius: "Don't forget Final Fantasy CDXLV"

That would require Square-Enix to have a production schedule they actually stick to, instead of bumping out their games by years at a time. In twenty years, we'll be lucky to be up to Final Fantasy XV at this point ;)
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait...Treyarch follow up as in they're making Modern Warfare 3, or just the next ACTUAL COD? Cause I thought they were different now.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:05PM Wickerman22 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
No, I'm sure that's one of the reasons for the Call of Duty drop from the IW developed games. I'm sure Treyarch will continue with the Call of Duty franchise while Infinity Ward continues with the Modern Warfare franchise. I think this a good move by Activision to better separate the developers and the franchises.


Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:52PM Cap Morgan said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Yes it is a smart move because Treyarch was smearing IW's good name.

Only Treyarch could make a tank level that bad.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 1:01PM Troy Powers said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So confusing. Are they going back to the numbered titles? The last one to be numbered was CoD4:MW. So, if the next one is 7, that must make W@W 5, and MW2 6. Makes sense, but it's still confusing. Hopefully this is just a working title until they decide officially on Call of Duty: Die, Nazi Scum.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 1:43PM Haggard said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
On the other hand, the gameplay of the two 'franchises' and core concepts are likely going to remain the same.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 2:16PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@tenor77

Aww you poor sheep, quit bahhing so loud and just keep following the rest of the herd.

Treyarch is a first rate developer, anyone who can pump out a new game in 6 months that is of the same quality as the other developer doing the exact same thing who takes 3 and a half years is truly a great developer. I'd like to see you work on the level Treyarch is forced too only to be mocked and overshadowed by the lazy self absorbed IW.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 4:43PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anticrawl

W@W had a two year development period, same as CoD4. so unless you are trying to compare CoD3 to CoD2, you are wrong.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The only CoD I've played is 4. I think it's better than halo 3. But MW2 I pushing it for me. Do we really need 7? So much for ingenuity.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:57AM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The only one you've played was CoD4 and you thought it was better than Halo 3. But you don't want to play a sequal to the game that you liked and thought was better than one of the top games on the 360 because you think it's 'pushing it'?

I don't understand you.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 7:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No you didn't understand me, I very much want MW2. I'm very happy about it, in fact. But how many iterations of WWII games can there be? Or is Treyarch just going to cheese off of more of Infinity Wards hard work? I've played limited amounts of 2 and 5. 2 was good, 5 didn't appeal to me. It just seems like Treyarch is sucking the life out of the series. I just don't want to get bored with CoD. I didn't mean to contradict myself earlier. I just meant that I'll only stick with the MW series, and more WWII games is just reaching. Even if it isn't WWII, then Treyarchs going to kill MW. It is about Price, afterall.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
come on how long are they going to continue milking this dry cow? WW2 is finished no1 needs to have every single bit ironed out of the story. MW 2 FTW nuff said.

@Orex probably thats how its going to end. for the game, in malta every maltese plays this game apart from pro evolution soccer and tekken so treyarch and activision will still get money from us
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Who said it was WWII? No-one.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
treyarch have always released WW2, even after COD4 so thats what it is gna be most probably
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Said a while ago they were gonna leave the WWII setting.

http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2008/10/20/call-of-duty-to-leave-wwii-settings-behind/
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:57AM RyanS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Call of Duty 2011
Call of Duty 2012
etc etc
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Call of Duty 2012"- Survive the Mayan Apocalypse!
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 2:20PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Call of Duty 9: The Legend of Curly's Gold
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 11:59AM The Blank Mage Returns said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Call of Duty 27: Screw It, Let's Bomb Poland."
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
what about australia? WTF M8 (taken from the flash video end of the world)
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:01PM butaneko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nom nom nom
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:03PM ExMcCloud said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow? I'm so surprised.....But at least they are moving on to Vietnam......More modern weapons and new environments!
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
M16 jams ftl
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 1:21PM Dr Stabbingworth said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I can't wait for the "dig your foxhole" and "sit in your foxhole all night in the darkness while guns go off all around you and you try not to go batshit insane" minigames.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:03PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
good grief...
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Those guys are funking relentless, they just don't learn from their mistakes... like lemmings!
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:27PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think they need to release a game very 2 years not every year....its overkill...hell CoD4 still has a STRONG online community and they are talking about the next one??
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know, the system is getting redundant.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 2:37PM bmill3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well I guess it could be worse, like with Guitar hero, pumping out 6+ games per year....
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the fuck!

If this is a joke, it ain't fucking hilarious!

And what the hell is a "follow up" to MW2? Are they going to ruin Modern Warfare now?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 1:07PM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
W@W is actually very good. I don't know why people still insist on bashing TreyArch.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:04PM StormEagle said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That logo doesn't have enough room for seven stars! Where's plan b??
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If MW2 isn't a CoD, wouldn't that make this CoD6? Does Treyarch know how to count?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Everyone knows that MW2 is the 6th game in the COD franchise whether it puts the number in the title or not. Stop being an idiot.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:36PM Mr Khan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
by that logic, GTAIV isn't really GTAIV, is it?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmmm, I guess I thought that people understood the difference between an internal title and an official title. My mistake.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hold on,
If IW are making Modern Warfare 2 (without the COD name),
then shouldn't this be COD 6?
I thought there was a big problem with calling COD: WAW number 5 due to all of the spin-offs and other platform specific games.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:14PM TangoEchoXray said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Am I the only one that hopes it would actually be "The Search for Captain Price"

I mean, if they're gonna do it, it might as well be about one of the best supporting characters since luigi.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 12:14PM Wickerman22 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, this is not a surprise at all. I think we can all pretty much expect the following:

Call of Duty 7: November 9, 2010
Modern Warfare 3: November 8, 2011
Call of Duty 8: November 13, 2012
etc..

The people that hate on Treyarch should be happy about this. This is one of the reasons the "Call of Duty" name was dropped. Activision wanted to better separate the developers and the franchises. I feel confident in assuming that IW will pretty much handle the modern stuff while Treyarch will continue with WWII and hopefully other historical conflicts.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW