| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (27)

Posted: May 13th 2009 6:10PM David Black said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
We really need some Risk or Axis and Allies pronto. I'd even settle for Stratego
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 6:11PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Potato Wave
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 7:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 9:47PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Make me fries...
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 6:21PM AnthonyGalindo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What's up with the suggestion for stand alone XBLA titles? Who wants that? I hope that they just continue to expand by adding more games to the collection of titles in Hasbro Family Game Night. Besides if we had stand alone XBLA games then we might not have Mr. Potato Head standing around in the middle of the game, and really that's half the joy of playing these on XBLA rather than in real life.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 9:28PM Regault said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd just want much less of Connect 4 and Monopoly and much more of Heroscape, Battle Cry, Samurai Swords, and Robo Rally.

Or at the very least include some boardgames the Hasbro subsidiaries haven't made in years like Survive!, Clue: Great Museum Caper, or The Omega Virus.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 10:35AM Burritoclock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, I just played Omega Virus the other day.

Unfortunately after we set it all up we realized the damn voice thing was broken, when you turned it on it would just go through everything in its memory until it was done.

So one of my friends had to design the map and be the Omega Virus, kinda like a poor man's Dungeon Master...

Good times!
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 6:41PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Trivial Pursuit bricks are the most common items found in thrift stores. Why would you pay 1000% more to have it on a console?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 6:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wizards of the Coast? Does that mean EA is publishing/developing the Magic the Gathering arcade game?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 6:51PM GewurztraminerX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$10 for RISK on the Family Game Night would be a good deal, but I have a feeling they'd rather make money than than on a game more complex like RISK (or Monopoly).
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 6:56PM chrisrackley said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I usually hate haters; but I've seen nothing redeeming in this. The entire model is broken built by people who've spent too much time in business school and not enough time with gamers.

They're essentially asking you to spend $30-50 to fully enjoy the experience they've created - plus no multiplayer.

The truth - the REAL truth - is that they know a full retail collection of these games would bomb and become bargain bin fodder in only a couple months. So releasing it this way helps them to stand behind the ideology of "choice for consumers" but really stands, statistically, to drive their profits.

The flipside? I highly doubt gamers are buying it and I highly doubt these games are selling well.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 6:57PM murph17 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Was Steve able to actually keep a straight face while explaining the virtues of $10 Connect Four?
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 7:00PM RudyHuxtable said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously? no one bothered to photoshop the scrabble letters?

No "I LUV YOU"?
No "U R SWEET"?
No "I ARE COO"?

I'm really disappointed.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 7:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So a Monopoly owns Monopoly? Sad.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 7:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't care what he says. $10 a piece is still about 500 points overpriced. Sure, the games retail for more than that in stores, but they are dumb games. Dumb meaning there is not much to them. Is it really that hard to program connect 4 and make it look nice? I doubt it. In that sense, they are not nearly worth the price tag.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 7:04PM matt247 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They are making a Risk: Halo Wars, I wish they put it on xbla
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 7:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Such a shame Atari never really did anything when they had the Hasbro rights.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 7:11PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll only buy these if I can show off my junk to other players.
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 7:36PM C1ph3rDivyne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
:: sighs::

Oh great. Just what the Wii/DS needs: more casual crap. Nintendo, when will the madness stop! Oh, how I miss the days of NES/SNES/N64, even GameCube. At least gamers were the focus of those consoles. No diss to casual players but I'm really sick to death of all the minigame/babysitting/Imagine this-that/personal whatever trainer stuff clogging up the aisles at game stores!!!
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 8:16PM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What about *actually* playing the *actual* board games?

I haven't played one in a while but I remember the thrill of playing one with my friends. Holding the pieces.. Throwing the dices.. I'm 19, I love videogames and I know I'm sounding like a 100 year old person, but this is really what I feel regarding digital versions of board games.

To me, they'll never surpass the original ones.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 1:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah there is nothing like playing the real deal.

But I must say... HFGN has seriously given me and my sister a chance to play scrabble together fairly regularly. She lives a good 500 miles away and it's nice to be able to play one of our favorite past times not just at Christmas. :)
Reply

Posted: May 13th 2009 9:39PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gator! DO GATOR!
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 12:39AM Ruk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's a shame proper names aren't allowed in Scrabble, or else "Garriot" would be a perfect word.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 6:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wish that the interviewers would push a bit harder in interviews like this. The 'is there much demand for connect 4 at $10' was a step in the right direction but it is all just a bit too pandering. I want to read interviews that answer the questions that readers of Joystiq want to hear, not just a marketing opportunity for Hasbro and EA.

I don't know about anyone else but I would have liked to see answers to:

"How can you justify charging 800 points ($10) for such basic games, especially as in most cases you can buy the physical game for less."

"If it is all about the social experience what is the point of making console versions of the games. If all of the players are in the same living room why not just play the actual game. "

I am all for porting board games to consoles if it actually adds to the experience, being able to play Settlers of Catan against the AI or online is great as it isn't that easy to get 4 people together whenever you want to play. But adding a few gimick game modes isn't going to make me shell out 800 points for Connect 4.

It is hard to see who games like this are for, they are marketed to families but I really find it hard to imagine mum, dad and the kids crowding round the tv to play Sorry! with a joypad.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 8:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hasbro owns Wizards of the Coast. Wizards of the Coast owns D&D. 1+1=?
Reply

Posted: May 15th 2009 3:59AM SisypheanLife said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want a online capable version of Fortress America.
Reply

Posted: May 17th 2009 7:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Risk is probably the only board game I'd get on a game system. I hope it comes with the different rule sets liek castle risk also.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW