| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (33)

Posted: May 14th 2009 12:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Cool. Maybe I can now finally put my science degree to good use.

Posted: May 14th 2009 12:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
How'd they manage to cook up an idea like that?

Posted: May 14th 2009 12:50PM thecannonater said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What you did there: I see it.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 12:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This sucks.

Posted: May 14th 2009 12:32PM riptatermen said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh, I get it! Boys are good at math, and girls should learn to cook so they can land a rich scientist husband. Thanks, Activision and Nintendo!

Posted: May 14th 2009 12:45PM Ethan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn Activision, reinforcing that prevailing male gender role of the crackpot scientist. I was always pressganged into trying out for the science teams when I was a kid.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 12:50PM cbarrentos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it's nice to see that Nintendo understands real American family values!
thank you, Nintendo, for making me understand that i can be anything i want within the realm of gender specifics!
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 1:06PM MatisyahuSerious said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"it's nice to see that Nintendo understands real American family values!"

yes, nintendo...well accused.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:33PM Haohmaru said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If either game were Nintendo-published titles, Rip's comment may.. MAY!! ..have been funny. But since they aren't, it's not just funny - it's frackin' hilarious.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:52PM riptatermen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I believe I covered the publisher with the "Activision" part, but regardless, I lumped Nintendo in because the Mama games are well-known, iconic Nintendo games oft-cited in their overarching attempts to appeal to female gamers.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 3:09PM MatisyahuSerious said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I lumped Nintendo in because the Mama games are well-known, iconic Nintendo games ..."

majesco, rather - and the hits keep coming!
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 3:29PM riptatermen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
By Nintendo games I mean games that one plays on a Nintendo system, in much the same way that I would casually refer to, say, Goldeneye as a Nintendo game.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 4:07PM STiger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So...would you say Final Fantasy is a Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft game? (This covers the PC and Xbox versions of FFXI)
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 4:25PM riptatermen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, Ralph, I'm going to marry a carrot. Are you seriously saying that you would, for example, refer to Gran Turismo as a Polyphony game instead of a Playstation game? Look, all I'm saying is that, fair or not, this is bound to reflect poorly on Nintendo in the eyes of the casual observer, even though most of the blame lies with Activision. Please try to pick up the shattered pieces of your lives and move on.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 4:41PM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"this is bound to reflect poorly on Nintendo in the eyes of the casual observer"

The "casual observer" is probably too dumb to care.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 6:00PM MatisyahuSerious said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sheesh rip, just takin' the piss...if we cant lovingly mock strangers on a website, we may as well just shutter the entire netterwebs.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 6:10PM cbarrentos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"it's nice to see that Nintendo understands real American family values!
thank you, Nintendo, for making me understand that i can be anything i want within the realm of gender specifics!"

seeing as you are unfamiliar with the concept of sarcasm, i will close the cash register at this point.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 6:28PM MatisyahuSerious said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow, take a gander at charlie ripping himself a new one.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 7:34PM riptatermen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Umm, I replied, but I didn't hit the reply button, so it's, um, down the page a bit. 'Cause I'm dumb. Also, I laughed the first time I read 'Matisyahu Serious', and then immediately felt guilty, and a little dirty, for having done so. So if that's reaction you were aiming for, congratulations!
OK, I'm done now.
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 12:39PM Ethan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
To be honest I think they just keep busy because the marriage isn't working.

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:04PM Roto13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I'm definitely more amused by the fact that Papa gets to be a scientist while Mama is stuck in the kitchen, occasionally going down on her knees... to do some gardening.

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I see what you did there, and surprisingly, find nothing wrong with it :)
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:08PM OMGitsaLisa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know I should be offended by the gender stereotypes or the blatant milking of a previous winning concept, but I still want to play it. :/

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know why cooking mama's feet are smaller that science papa's?
So she can get closer to the oven.
/s
Reply

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:19PM RobS the 3rd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Activision is just reinforcing the white male reality, as I have come to understand from going to college.

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:21PM KaBob799 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dumb name

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:25PM Stix Remix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But does he have flaming eyes when you fail?!

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:30PM KaBob799 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also, can people settle down about gender stereotypes. What if it was Cooking Papa and Scientist Mama, would that make any difference at all? Then they would be using women to sell science and saying that men are better chefs...

Posted: May 14th 2009 2:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The science and cooking mini-game-based games wouldn't be a bad idea at all, if they didn't try to give the games main characters that imply offensive sexism!!!

Do they really not see what they're doing and how bad of an example it is for the young kids they're targeting? The sexism implied in Cooking Mama was iffy, but this is blatant with Science Papa.

It's also just sad that they are doing all of this simply for brand recognition.

Posted: May 14th 2009 7:15PM riptatermen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sorry, Matisyahu Serious! I don't know what I was thinking, taking The Internets seriously. Just say you'll take me back, Internets, and I promise it'll be all poop jokes and cats with poor diction from now on!

Posted: May 15th 2009 1:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why didn't they just come out with Science Mama? She's already left the kitchen a few times.
I mean, it's like - blam, nothing offensive, you keep the brand name, you continue to reinforce the character, and people who see the box will say "Oh I enjoyed Cooking/Gardening/Sewing/Ironing Mama! I want to see her do REAL PERSON stuff now!"

Posted: May 16th 2009 10:31PM emichan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For all those a bit concerned about the gender stereotyping, there's an upcoming RPG called "Science Girls" you might want to check out. :)

Posted: May 28th 2009 5:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
from the provided screen shots, this just looks like a crap attempt to capitalise on the success of the mama series!
I think majesco should bring out a similarly themed game to show them how it should be done.
despite that, I believe the competition aspect they mention for science papa is a nice twist/addition.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW