| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (40)

Posted: May 20th 2009 7:46PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I started reading the post, and upon seeing the bountiful italics and well, the entire second paragraph I knew this had to be a McElroy's work
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 8:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're on joystiq waaaaaaay too much, bro.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 9:00PM nightmare452 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And I say the rest of us aren't on Joystiq enough.

LOL
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 9:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He just happens to express himself more than us, lol.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 7:50PM gonintendo said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The guy on the right will remain in my nightmares forever. and ever.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 7:52PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
he looks some some sort of demonically possessed james caan
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 7:52PM DWells55 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He looks like Jack Thompson ten years from now. That and he looks like he wants to devour your soul.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 7:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The guy on the left will remain in my nightmares forever.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 7:56PM Sinister Rouge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey now... constipation is no joke.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 1:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought James Caan WAS the demonically possessed James Caan...
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 1:12AM PARANOID365 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If this picture alone doesn't prove that we need to euthanize seniors, I don't know what does.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 10:06AM Uncle Jesse said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That babe on the left will be in my dreams
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 7:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tons of people played games without purchasing games, whereas going out to the movie means you are spending money(stealing discounted). If they add in watching dvds or movies on tv , or specify purchasing games this changes a lot.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 8:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so, Im not spending money when I rent a game?
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 8:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, semantics troll, that is clearly exactly what I said.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 12:28AM Courtney said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ryan, you rather missed the point of the study. It wasn't specifically about whether or not people are paying for content, but how people choose to spend their free time (though there are some sales stats in the study too). Taking a look at the types of entertainment people seek out, regardless of cost, is valuable data to a variety of industries.

Try taking a look at the source data before jumping to conclusions.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 5:35AM Dummy00001 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Courtney. So essentially the study did find that we are more couch potatoes than outgoers? ... Is that still considered news???
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 4:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, I completely understood that this is typical PR spin.It is comparing two things which could be comparable but ignoring a HUUGE variable that changes everything. Gaming isn't beating watching movies, gaming is beating specifically going out to theaters, which is only a small chunk of movie watching.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 7:56PM Sinister Rouge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well that is the best news I have heard all day. Take that, Movie snobs!
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 7:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's because movies can get expensive. A family of 4 for a 2 hr movie can run you up to $40. That's a lot of money, whereas, you can buy a game console and a few games and then play them over and over again every day and weekend with your family. In the end, you end up saving money and time by gaming. If you are a Wii owner, Mario Kart costs you $50 and everyone can play for HOURS. it's a much better deal for your money than 2 hrs sitting in a movie theater.

No need to find parking, wait in hr long lines to see popular movies, pay $40 for a family of 4 and more if you want food, no hassle.....
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 9:11PM yakapo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you fandango and get popcorn, soda, and 1 bag of candy you'll easily break $60 for family of 4.



Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 10:59PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You sure make some good points chamelean.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 8:02PM D3m0sthenes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just look at it from a value standpoint.

Summer blockbuster movie
- $9 per ticket, and who goes to the movies alone?
- 2 hours
- Replayability add $20 for the DVD or $9 to see it again.

Fall block buster video game
- $60
- I'd be pretty conservative saying the average game is 6 hours
- Replayability add $50 for XBL, and in the case of the typical "blockbuster" Halo 3 CoD 4 etc. add 100 hours of gameplay (I think that's about right no?)
- Social aspect of gaming
- Etc. Etc.

The choice is more than clear.


Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 8:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It always warms my heart to hear about video games becoming a more accepted thing. It's great to see gaming taking its rightful place in society amongst other forms of entertainment.

However, it will from now on always freak me out when I recall seeing that old guy's face in this post's picture... it's been seared into my memory. o_0
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 8:34PM RobS the 3rd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Granddad: Don't make me get the belt!
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 8:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be fair to movies they'd have to include statistics about movies watched at home (rentals, purchased discs, on TV...), too, right?
Going to a cinema is not the only form of watching. Movie studios probably earn more with the DVDs and Blu-Rays.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 9:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah video games have long surpassed movie theater watching, but I believe they continue to lag behind the movie industry as a whole.

Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 9:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Satoru Iwata's strategy was right. They wanted people to play a videogame as an enjoyable experience instead of say, going to a movie.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 9:22PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Next step is nuking Hollywood, right? Or am i getting this backwards?
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 10:11PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Movies are easier to pirate and even if you do buy your games, you get far more hours of enjoyment for you buck.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 11:00PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, get the belt, put your damn pants back on! : P
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 11:09PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oops I crapped my pants.
Reply

Posted: May 20th 2009 11:20PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Video games *are* great, yes.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 12:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love watching movies but I hate going to the movie theater. It's just so damn inconvenient and expensive. Besides, I like having subtitles along with my movies (sometimes actors tend to mumble their lines.). Yay for Netflix!
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 1:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, what's the percentage for the movies people watch on pay per view since that's all we do anymore or let alone people who rent movies. Movie theater's pricing is going up instead of down with this economy. PPV, still the same price. Gaming compared to going out to the movies, seriously we're lazy as a society lol, and I don't like having to pay for gas and food (theaters are 45 mins away from us). I blame Amazon with their free shipping, haha frequent customer with them I am.
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 1:09AM PARANOID365 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone else notice that it looks like their trying to control us ?? I told ya the Wii was evil; Nintendo and their dam mind control devices, good thing I have my tin foil hat on !!
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 6:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Spielberg... visionary? Oh give me a break!
Anyway, it's not really news the game industry is right now the biggest market in the entertainment industry...
but I'm not sure we're winning anything this way...
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2009 8:57AM profeteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Silly old people and their upside-down controller craziness. Them's some skillz.
Reply

Posted: May 26th 2009 2:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Video games are better than films.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 11:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ha ha. "Keep the fire, brother. Your hour of victory draws near."

You make it sound like movies will die altogether. There's no way! Ha ha. Movies are still a major part of our culture and everybody loves watching movies.

I know what you meant though, and I know what other people would say in response to this, so there's really no need. lol
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW