| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (70)

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Interesting new idea for Nintendo....a hard drive.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:23PM StormEagle said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Here's a few more:

Next gen graphics.
A more solid online interface.
More teen-mature rated games.
A DVD Player.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Storm

I fear if Nintendo did all that, they would sell like crazy, again, leading to Nintendo to ultimately ruling the world.

On second thought, I wouldn't mind having Mario as my lord and savior...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:39PM RobS the 3rd said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And this new world shall be called... Mario world.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:45PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
and the new world would be called super mario world

fixed

A DVD player? thats stupid. that would have been like putting a VCR in my 360. everything should at least have a BR player and im sure sony will be pushing their next media format
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:02PM Mr Khan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
But its obvious that only a small part of the market cares about those features, so there's no real reason to call them "compelling"
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:07PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Is there a particular reason I got downvoted?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 4:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
A Blu-Ray player can play DVDs, so either way you can play DVDs.

@ ArchGamer
It was probably because you said Nintendo will rule the world again. I think other fanboys take objection to that. Other than that, the last thing you said was downright blasphemous.
Reply

Posted: May 23rd 2009 3:14PM matias said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why? because he said Mario?

Not everyone is from a religion, and what he said is a joke, take it easy.

I think is clear that Nintendo's next console will have HD and HDD, plus that unique something that nintendo's consoles always have (hoping for head tracking or some expanded reality stuff, I'd love to see some of that).
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:21PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
lets see....

4 Wii's + 32GB HDD= Wii 2

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:23PM MarkezJM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You need some sort of adhesive somewhere in that equation...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:23PM Istari Spartan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
pssst, you forgot the duct-tape.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:28PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
no no no....do it like they did the PS3...networking millions of PS3s cures cancer......

I wonder how many Wiis that would take
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
TEN TRILLION
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:22PM Istari Spartan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Every game online and voicechat throughout...

Now, if only someone would have the bright idea to think of that, oh wait...

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:26PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
"Every game online and voicechat throughout..."

Unnecessary. Two games right off the top of my head to prove my point: Resident Evil and Final Fantasy (not including Crystal Chronicles). Please tell me why either of those franchises would require online components.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:32PM Istari Spartan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Never played either of those games, but here's a thought:
Online co-op and downloadable... stuff, you know,levels, weapons etc.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 5:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@cody

Resident Evil 5 + Online = Awesome game
4 player FFCC would be much easier to accomplish online rather than meeting up

Horrible examples bro.
Reply

Posted: May 24th 2009 7:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wouldn't that be why he said "not includding FF CC"? Also, echoes of time is online.
I'd be amazed if anyone really thought ALL games should be online...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I predict the singular title that is MH3 will garner more Japanese 3rd party sales and support for Wii than all PS3 and 360 3rd party games combined.

Sony HAS to be kicking themselves for losing the exclusivity (is that a word?) to this game.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:26PM Kyammi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No mistake, MH3 will be huge. If it was 360 exclusive it'd still be huge. Hell, they could release it on Sega Genesis and it'd be huge. That and Dragon Quest.

However, no way in hell it'll reach the levels you're saying... There are many PS3 3rd party games that have sold 100,000's in Japan. Hell, there are 360 3rd party games that have sold 100,000's in Japan...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
How bout some HD, Nintendo?

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:25PM Istari Spartan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What would/should a new Gameboy have?

Or did the DSi effectively kill the Gb range?

Arguments below please.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:45PM KaBob799 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm pretty sure they said that the popularity of the DS meant the gameboy line was over.
Reply

Posted: May 26th 2009 2:43AM AntiVillian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you mean the DS isn't a gameboy?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:27PM Shagittarius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I bet "making a shit-ton" of money constitutes a 'very interesting idea'.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:30PM DonaldMick said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Very interesting idea" run through a corporate BS filter comes out with "When the Wii stops printing money".

So 2014?

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:36PM RobS the 3rd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What happens when you run through the Sony BS about a 10 year life cycle?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:36PM manyquestions said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While "when the Wii stops printing money" is the obvious answer to when we'll see the next Nintendo system, it's not necessarilly the translation of "very interesting idea". Of course, they're not going to release a new system while there's still life in the old system. That's just stupid; the systems would compete with each other and they'd lose money. However, that doesn't meant hey can't also be looking for interesting new hardware ideas for Wii's successor.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 6:57PM Extinction said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ps 1 and 2 lasted 10 years. How is ps3 doing so bs? Quit being a fantroll
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:47PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully with their next system they will take to their third party developers and see what features they would like to see so we can actually have some descent, highly polished games that aren't made by Nintendo.

Or if they don't, they might as well call their next system the "Smash Brothers Adapter".

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:47PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*talk
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:00PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That would be a very ass-backwards way to do it. Nintendo develops hardware around software, they do not listen to the dictates of the industry
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 4:57PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@khan

Ummmm, ass backwards? Why do you think developers love working with the 360? Companies like Epic, Ubisoft, EA and THQ were all inquired about what they would like to see in the next generation Xbox. The biggest thing everyone wanted was more RAM. What did Microsoft do? They gave them more RAM. Why do you think the 360 has the highest third party attachment rate? Because third party companies actually make money off their games on the 360 as opposed to the ones they release on the Wii. Nintendo maybe "winning" at retail with hardware sales and first party software sales, but they have been losing the third party software ground since the Gamecube days.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 5:11PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
No. Wii sells the most 3rd party software, and more 3rd parties make profit off of Wii software than anything else

look it up
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 5:29PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Okay, you obviously don't understand numbers. Console to console, the Wii has the LOWEST third party attachment rate, PERIOD. Example, Guitar Hero World Tour sold 4x as many units on the 360 than it did the Wii. This can be said for other multiplatform games as well. The third party games sold on the Wii is misleading because they are accounting for total units sold, for every third party game released for the Wii, multiplatform AND exclusive. If you break the numbers down, any game that sold on the Wii that was multiplatform, sold 3-4 times more on the 360 and/or the PS3.

Look it up.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 5:46PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
True, but that makes little difference to 3rd parties. Attach Rates only matter to the console manufacturers, and it only really matters to Sony and Microsoft ultimately, because attach rates show if you're making up for the loss on the individual console with appropriate software sales for that console.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 6:42PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Attach rates only concern console manufacturers? Are you mental? If I was a developer and saw that the Wii had the lowest third party software attach ratio, would I really want to make a game for it?

HELL NO.

Capcom, Ubisoft and EA all learned from this which is why they have changed their Wii software forecasts for their next fiscal year. Something a lot of people forget is that yes, the Nintendo moves first party hardware/software but they surely as hell do not move third party ANYTHING. Do you really think the Wii can survive forever with first party titles? *cough* Gamecube *cough*

NPD, GameIndustry.biz and Reuters has all the numbers, I suggest you do some more research.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 7:23PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
And why does attach rate matter in the face of profit? With Wii, you sell more units overall, and rake in a better profit per unit. Not necessarily more of a single game, but when you can break even with 1/4th the sales (or less), when compared to opposing consoles, there's no reason not to.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:48PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*decent

Damn Google Chrome.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:54PM OrionXR said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've always worried about the Wii's life cycle. What's the advantage of a long life cycle when you're already raking in money from the first sale? They can follow Apple's iPhone model where they just upgrade it every year rather than Sony's ten-year model. I wonder if that's keeping third party developers from sinking time/money into it. On the bright side, it shouldn't cost that much more to retain backwards compatibility if they upgrade it.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 2:57PM GewurztraminerX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The GB micro is not such a bad idea anymore in this GBA-less world the DSi is carving out.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I totally agree.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:01PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It'll see a 2011 release, whatever it is. I really think it would be a mistake for Nintendo to go with conventional wisdom (which, thankfully, is something they never do anyway), and hold on to Wii for as long as it will make money.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:10PM manyquestions said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Everybody talking about HD, harddrives, etc: I'm sure a lot of that's being considerd in the plans for any new console they make, but it doesn't necessarily constitute a "very interesting idea". Those are obvious advances that probably will follow, but not enough alone to justify an entirely new console. If that's all they added, the new device should simply be a new version of the old one (i.e. Wii would be to WiiHD as DS is to DSi). What I _think_ they're talking about is something else, something unique to their system that will make it worthwhile for the customer to update from Wii, or buy their console instead of MS or Sony's, basically the same logic behind making the Wii in the first place.

Personally, I think it'll be exciting to see how they do that after motion controls.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 4:11PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Pretty much. They understand that their audience won't buy a new console if they say "Now with a 2.4 Ghz multicore processor instead of that dinky old 729 Mhz single core!" so they have to come up with something more compelling, something more visceral and visible

It should be interesting, anyway.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:12PM Shagittarius said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
By 'Very interesting Idea' they mean gimmick.

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:31PM zero21xxx said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know Shag, I frequent this sight and I think you might be one of like eight people who doesn't get moist at the very mention of Wii or Nintendo. I salute you. It's nice to know someone else shares some of my opinions.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2009 3:47PM Shagittarius said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Zero we sir are true gaming patriots. Be proud.
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW