Acclaimed Hollywood director and self-professed Team ICO fan, Guillermo del Toro, sees a bright future for video games, claiming that the next decade will bring about titles of an "earthshaking Citizen Kane" caliber. Basing his thoughts on the dynamics of narrative in sandbox games, del Toro states that this evolution in storytelling (he coined as "story engine" in his interview with Wired) will turn into something so powerful that it will not only give us better games, but also change Hollywood and "rewrite the rules of fiction."
While this may seem like a bold prediction difficult to live up to, del Toro assures he won't hobbit away from the responsibility of seeing it come true. "I'll be trying to make [such a game]," he told Wired. "But I won't be trying until after The Hobbit." There you have it folks, del Toro "Citizen Kane" game confirmed* for 2019. Mark it down.
*Not actually confirmed
[Via GameDaily]
Reader Comments (79)
Posted: May 27th 2009 10:25AM Saria the Cat said
If he made a game and it was half as good as Pan's Labyrinth the movie was, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. Anything associated with the Del Toro name is an instant feast for my senses.
Oh yeah, and Mexicans FTW!
Reply
Oh yeah, and Mexicans FTW!
Posted: May 26th 2009 11:48PM Michelobius said
I'll do you one better: this game will be made by Jonathan Blow:
http://www.examiner.com/x-3414-Minneapolis-Video-Game-Examiner~y2009m3d16-Jonathan-Blow-Video-game-auteur
Reply
http://www.examiner.com/x-3414-Minneapolis-Video-Game-Examiner~y2009m3d16-Jonathan-Blow-Video-game-auteur
Posted: May 27th 2009 2:39AM (Unverified) said
What will make a game great will be what separates games from other forms of media, it wont be reading a text box, it will be the game play and the experience. Braid was reading a boring book with interesting game play in between.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 3:34AM Michelobius said
Right, which is why Braid wasn't it. He has bigger and better things in his future. The story being so separated from the gameplay was Braid's biggest flaw, except for in the ending, but oh, what an ending.
He showed enough flashes of inspiration in Braid that I can count on him to produce even better stuff in the future.
Reply
He showed enough flashes of inspiration in Braid that I can count on him to produce even better stuff in the future.
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:19AM The Blank Mage Returns said
Nothing important, dude burns his sled and feels bad about it.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:19AM Funkmaster General said
So many things about your question depress me.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 8:27AM (Unverified) said
The most important film in all of film history. Highly regarded as the best movie of all time.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 4:15PM juggalotusmx said
the best movie of all time? that's highly debatable, what about the 7th Seal or even modern stuff like shawshank redemption, oh and let's not forget titanic won all the academy awards (that last one was pure sarcasm)
Reply
Posted: May 26th 2009 11:51PM (Unverified) said
Well... I do believe in del Toro's work. If anything, maybe HE can do pull of a high-caliber game narrative.
Reply
Posted: May 26th 2009 11:58PM TheyDidItFirst said
I love classic movies, but I hated Citizen Kane. Still, I can see why it is an important film.
I don't think gaming will ever have an equivalent to it though. Citizen Kane is remarkable because it tells such an encompassing story that is applicable to nearly everyone, everywhere. The technology of videogames, however, makes the idea of a game that can be played in 70 years and enjoyed just as much as upon its release bogus. Despite advancements in filming technique and color (obviously), a movie made in the 1930s looks just as good as a modern movie - this means that movies will always be judged based on the quality of storytelling, characterization, cinimatography, and other aspects rather than visual quality. This is not true for videogames - until games become utterly visually realistic they will always be judged at least partly by their graphics. A game made in 10 years that may seem to have the same effect on the industry as Citizen Kane had on Hollywood will likely be reduced to a footnote in 20. It may still be played by those who love a "retro" experience, just as many old games are played now, but I imagine it will be lost in the storm of exciting, new games.
Reply
I don't think gaming will ever have an equivalent to it though. Citizen Kane is remarkable because it tells such an encompassing story that is applicable to nearly everyone, everywhere. The technology of videogames, however, makes the idea of a game that can be played in 70 years and enjoyed just as much as upon its release bogus. Despite advancements in filming technique and color (obviously), a movie made in the 1930s looks just as good as a modern movie - this means that movies will always be judged based on the quality of storytelling, characterization, cinimatography, and other aspects rather than visual quality. This is not true for videogames - until games become utterly visually realistic they will always be judged at least partly by their graphics. A game made in 10 years that may seem to have the same effect on the industry as Citizen Kane had on Hollywood will likely be reduced to a footnote in 20. It may still be played by those who love a "retro" experience, just as many old games are played now, but I imagine it will be lost in the storm of exciting, new games.
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:22AM Michelobius said
I don't know about this. Starcraft and Half-Life are still played by many and are masterpieces from 10 years ago, even though we've gone further in the last 10 years than we will in the next ten.
It's easy to get caught up in the new releases of any industry, and it's true that it's more likely for games, but classics still endure. I think you're vastly understating the influence of older games.
Reply
It's easy to get caught up in the new releases of any industry, and it's true that it's more likely for games, but classics still endure. I think you're vastly understating the influence of older games.
Posted: May 27th 2009 1:55AM (Unverified) said
I would venture to say that Shadow of the Colossus surpasses Citizen Kane
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 2:05AM (Unverified) said
I would venture to say that Shadow of the Colossus surpasses Citizen Kane
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 5:33PM (Unverified) said
I believe there are those few games that have come out that are the gaming industries great classics, Think of how many people still play mario, and how many games it has inspired, in 10 years people will still be playing super mario bros and enjoying the experience. Games are different than movies and books, its not about the visuals, or writing, its about how everything comes together to form the experience.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 10:30AM TheDarkWayne said
I have no idea what you're talking about, if you're saying a movie from 1930s really has the same picture quality as a modern HD film you're crazy.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:43PM (Unverified) said
DarkWayne, HD resolution PALES in comparison to film resolution. It looks damn fine, yes, but well shot film stock-no matter how old-will always have more detail.
Have you tried watching an older film on BluRay? The level of detail increase from DVD to BluRay is incredible, and the same is true from HD to film (ie, my Star Trek 2 Blu Ray looks great, but when I saw a pristine film print recently it looked even better)..
Reply
Have you tried watching an older film on BluRay? The level of detail increase from DVD to BluRay is incredible, and the same is true from HD to film (ie, my Star Trek 2 Blu Ray looks great, but when I saw a pristine film print recently it looked even better)..
Posted: May 27th 2009 3:18PM raygungirl said
SuckItTrebek, you must not have a very nice HD screen. Unless I'm seeing a movie on a digital projector, the film version is always a disappointment. I frequently find myself thinking, "I can't wait to see this on BluRay," while I'm sitting in the theatre. Kind of a shame, really. I miss when the theatre was the end-all be-all of movie-watching.
I think the biggest difference is just screen size. Of course you'll "see more detail" when the screen is 80 feet wide, as opposed to 60" diagonal (if you're lucky), no matter what.
Reply
I think the biggest difference is just screen size. Of course you'll "see more detail" when the screen is 80 feet wide, as opposed to 60" diagonal (if you're lucky), no matter what.
Posted: May 28th 2009 7:42PM (Unverified) said
Jess, I don't mean this as a slight (simply a sad fact) but you're probably watching movies that are being run in a suburban bajillion screen multiplex where the "projectionist" is a bored 16 year old kid who is barely trained on the basics of how to do the job-if at all. Find a theatre run by film nuts, who know and care about proper presentation and care for their product. HD resolution is WAY below 35mm film stock, and even the supernice 4K projectors are incredible but don't offer what film does (hence, for instance, why IMAX is shot on FILM and not digitally). If HD were across the board superior, no one would be using film, but it's still the dominant medium in Hollywood. The James Bond movies recently got a 4k scan-which is far beyond the definition offered by HD-for future posterity. A 4k digital scan and it's STILL not the level of detail of the original film stock, not that most users would notice, but that's the kind of scope needed to make a quality presentation even in a lower grade format.
Movies can actually lose even MORE detail and look worse on BluRay due to digital grain reduction. I love a pristine image, but in the quest for crystal clarity studios are simply scrubbing away minor detail, making an image look unnaturally sterile.
I'd suggest checking out www.thedigitalbits.com and learning more about all aspects of the digital video revolution!
Reply
Movies can actually lose even MORE detail and look worse on BluRay due to digital grain reduction. I love a pristine image, but in the quest for crystal clarity studios are simply scrubbing away minor detail, making an image look unnaturally sterile.
I'd suggest checking out www.thedigitalbits.com and learning more about all aspects of the digital video revolution!
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:08AM (Unverified) said
That's right and it's going to be made by ME!!
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:12AM ch3burashka said
THIS JUST IN!!! UNJUSTIFIED STATEMENT MAKES FRONT PAGE NEWS!
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 7:54AM (Unverified) said
This is joystiq... every blog post is front page news because that's how the site is set up...
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 11:27AM Ricky Bango said
In what way is Del Toro's prediction "unjustified?" I don't think you know what that word means.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:12AM SheppyReturns said
Anyone who wants gamings Citizen Kane is a prick. The movie was largely hated by filmgoers and critics alike, it literally destroyed two men, and very nearly detroyed RKO studios.
Fact of the matter is Citizen Kane wasn't even recognized as a great film until decades later. So what we, as moronic little children hoping to legitimize a medium that's been legitimized time and time again, is to destroy so many people and jobs and studios for the sake of a game we'd all fucking hate for 20 years. I feel sorry for the poor bastard who actually DOES create gamings Citizen Kane.
Reply
Fact of the matter is Citizen Kane wasn't even recognized as a great film until decades later. So what we, as moronic little children hoping to legitimize a medium that's been legitimized time and time again, is to destroy so many people and jobs and studios for the sake of a game we'd all fucking hate for 20 years. I feel sorry for the poor bastard who actually DOES create gamings Citizen Kane.
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:20AM The Blank Mage Returns said
Sled burning quicktime events. Sign me up.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:23AM Funkmaster General said
You looked way too much into his statement. I'm sure that he only meant that there will be a game that is as highly regarded as the film, which is indeed highly regarded, whatever the opinion of it was at the time. Many, many things are not appreciated until way after their time, and I'm sure that there are at least a few things that you like that fall into that category. Really, that has nothing to do with it. He wants a highly regarded game that matches a highly regarded film. That's all.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 12:24AM Funkmaster General said
and also, you're a jackass for calling me a prick.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 4:25PM Blaquebeird said
There you are! I was getting worried no one was left who would read way too much into everything and get offended for no reason, but you always deliver, Sheppy.
Reply
Posted: May 27th 2009 8:41AM The Blank Mage Returns said
Peter Jackson? Tim Burton? J.J. Abrams? They all get my personal vote. Del Toro has yet to move past "artsy weird" status.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










