| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (26)

Posted: May 27th 2009 8:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 8:50PM MC Double Def DP said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't laughed so hard at an image in a long time. lol!
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 8:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well its not like they can make money out of shit anyway o.o..
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 8:54PM The Kong said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bionic Commando wasn't shit...
Reply

Posted: May 28th 2009 4:20AM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it wasn't shit, but it wasn't good either. It had the worst dialogue I've heard in recent memory. It also teased you with open world but then kills you with radiation for trying to strafe an enemy or going to the top of a tall building to look around.
Reply

Posted: May 28th 2009 10:19AM Johnny Neat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why was he down voted?

Bionic Commando: Rearmed was all they had as solid work and that was a polish of a classic.

To be frank; The new Bionic Commando is lackluster at best while Terminator blows horribly and Wanted somewhere in between. Sorry but Grin may have some talented designers but their programmers etc are suspect at best.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 8:52PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's because Terminator and Wanted sucked. HARD. I can't believe I'm even playing Terminator all the way through, even as a devoted Terminator fan this doesn't seem worth it, at least it has good achievements
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 8:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It also didn't help that one of the developers for Wanted call the Wii a "fucking Genesis", and the whole 4 hour length thing.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 8:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Of those three games, Bionic is sadly the good one...
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:02PM LegendK1ll3r said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I enjoyed Wanted, who cares if it's 4 hours? CoD4 is 4 hours. Stop complaining. The time it takes you shouldn't matter as long as the gameplay is good, which it is. You can always replay it, and that adds more time to replay value. Getting collectibles also adds more replay value / time, so really, please, shut the hell up about it being 4 hours already.

Thank you.

Either way, kind of sucks, I really enjoy Grin, and I'm sure they don't have all that much staff to begin with, so the release of 100 really sucks. Hopefully they'll still be able to produce some quality games (B.C. is fantastic; as-is B.C.R., and Wanted is enjoyable; haven't touched Terminator yet).
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:05PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
collectibles are not fun. fuck collectibles, it's 2009 that's 20 years ago shit.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, CoD4 had multiplayer, and Wanted did not.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:25PM LegendK1ll3r said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
CoD4 had collectibles (in a way, with the TV's and Intel; WaW had the cards) so it's not 20 years ago, if it's still prevalent in games today.

As for mutliplayer, not everyone plays the multiplayer. I usually play more single player than I do mutliplayer, and I'd rather have no multiplayer, than to have a botched multiplayer mode like The Darkness had.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 10:27PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
just because a modern game has it doesn't mean it's an antiquated idea. Old people still dont believe in evolution or like black people
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 10:27PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
err, rather doesn't mean it's NOT an antiquated idea
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 11:00PM Levi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think collectables are almost too easy of a way for devs to add replayability. They used to be kinda cool, but now they are so standard, it's like they just throw em in because they're expected to be there.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:04PM Levi said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Dude, Bionic Commando came out at such a bad time. It is SUCH a fun game. The review was spot-on, although I think the overall tone was less positive than I would have written.

It does start out a bit slow, but slow didn't translate to "not fun" to me. The game starts out fun and just keeps getting better. Some of the fights in the game are so friggin intense. It's by far my #1 game of the year so far, and I'm about 75% through it.

Whatever you do, don't judge it by the multiplayer demo. The single player is so much fun it's crazy. The multiplayer is actually a lot of fun too, but it's more fun once you blast through some of the story first.

I honestly haven't had this much fun with a game in forever. At 23 years old, I thought the fact that I wasn't getting excited over games anymore was an age thing, but since I got the game and got a couple hours into it, I can't wait to get home to fire it up.

I hope Grin doesn't go under.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed, learning to play bionic commando while getting spammed with bullets and zip kicks doesn't make you want to learn.

The single player really coddles you into learning the mechanic.

Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I feel bad for GRIN you know. It feels like all three of there big hits were ripped out of there hands. People like Rearmed because GRIN had all the time in the world to develop an Xbox Arcade game based an ancient NES game. They hit the big leagues, and they are given three relatively large properties, and tell them "you got six months to make these games." So I'm giving GRIN the benefit of the doubt, just cause I think they have enthusiasm, something a lot studios don't share.
Reply

Posted: May 28th 2009 10:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wanted: almost 2 years
BC: more than 2 years
Terminator: the one with less developing period...
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:20PM Giantenemycrab said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why does it still look like a grin, even upside down?
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:25PM Diezal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't played Terminator yet, but I've enjoyed both Bionic Commando AND Wanted. They weren't the best in quality but they still gave a good gaming experience IMO.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I see that Grin still manages to keep all 5 gold teeth at the expense of the employees that got the pink slip.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:41PM koehler83 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As far as Im aware, this is fairly common upon completing everything you've been working on for several years, which GRIN just has. Why keep paying QA people and all the end of the line people when you have nothing in the pipeline close to needing them? You lay them off until you need them again.

That said, many of them will never be coming back as GRIN has likely lost some investors since releasing their latest projects. I don't think BC will live up to expectations and Terminator is junk. Not many studios can afford a flop these days.
Reply

Posted: May 27th 2009 9:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully those 100+ were the assholes responsible for that crap 'Terminator' game and whatever that garbage with the bending bullet trajectories they called 'Wanted'

Hmmm, 2/3 games suck. 2/3 games were movie licenses.

Maybe GRIN would make some $$ if they stick to making real games like Bionic Commando.

At least terminator has dead easy cheevos... I just feel so unclean for having played it.
Reply

Posted: May 28th 2009 12:46AM Bastard11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess this means Rearmed will definitely not be getting those trophies now. :(
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW