| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (84)

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There are a couple of websites online that host this kind of service... and on a much smaller level, there are threads of trustworthy people who trade games... such as on gamerswithjobs.com

I thought CAG does or did have something similar to that... but a commercial entity doing something like that wouldn't make a dime from doing it... so it's pretty much left up to internet swaps, which I've come to not trust after my dealings with eBay.

But I know what you're saying and having something like that would be ideal for a game I played and loved but don't want to trade in just to get like $4.00 for it.
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There is a place that you can swap games online. It's called say swap. http://www.sayswap.com/
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 12:01PM p07h3ad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You just described Goozex

http://www.goozex.com/referral.asp?idr=6184250553767
much better than Amazon, eBay, or Gamestop
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 9:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is that even legal!?

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:25AM theseventhysmbol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That is not a haiku : (
I counted.
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Thumb Prints required!
How is that even legal?
Good I don't live there
Reply

Posted: May 31st 2009 2:19AM StrikeMan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Is that even legal!?"

FTA: "Broward County Sheriff's Office spokeswoman Kayla Concepcion said the new requirement comes straight from the Florida Legislature, which enacted a law on October 1 of last year that treated video games like second-hand goods sold at pawn shops. Now any store buying used video games has to collect the thumb prints, along with a bunch of other personal info about the seller."

So yes, it at least fits a textboox definition of "legal".
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 10:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reason number 3,785 why I hate living in Florida.

Posted: May 30th 2009 10:39AM BostonJohn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All the more reason to use game trading sites.

Posted: May 30th 2009 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As a former manager of Rhino Video Games and current manager/owner of Level 8 Video Games, I can tell you this is old(er) news.

In 2005 at Rhino, we were required to take a thumb print, brief description (Ht,Wt,etc), and obtain a signature for all trade/cash transactions. Additionally, we were required to mail the documentation for these to the local Sheriff's office (Polk County).

This process is one of the reasons we do not give cash for games at Level 8. We would like to but the process is at the cost of the business (duh) and we would have to pay an additional yearly fee.

The idea, obviously, is to protect citizens by limiting the number of outlets through which criminals can fence stolen merchandise. Of course, since it is government run, there is no efficiency to the system.

Picture your local Gamestop (or one day, local Level 8!). Think of how many finger prints that is per day, per city, per county. In a city with just two or three Gamestops and maybe a half dozen pawn shops, a sheriff's dept would be completely overrun with thousands of prints, signatures, and paperwork from what are largely completely legitimate transactions.

If you can picture this in your mind, you can understand how all government works, why it naturally grows, and why it must constantly be cut and trimmed.

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That is kinda strange...the GameStop stores down here in Arizona don't even ask for an address! Bookman's only has me fill out a bill of sale as a formality, and then only for major hardware. The only place I 'had' to be fingerprinted (apart from my desktop) was Universal Studios last summer, apparantly so I couldn't give my tickets away for the second day (that place was a joke).

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeah...this is old news, we've been doing this since beginning of 2007. it really sucks and it's pointless. i've only had one ticket come up for suspicion....NOBODY records their serial numbers to their systems, so when their stolen there is no way to track them...rediculous. most people don't care though, and it keeps most theives out of the shop selling hot stuff all the time....it is a pain in the ass though.

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:39AM hey buddy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game industry loves this, I'm guessing. The person hocking a stolen game is certainly the minority - far more likely that the person selling the game is simply a gamer who has gotten all he wants out of the game and wants to trade it towards another game - making me think that the game industry likely lobbied for that legislature that added 'used games' to that list, discouraging people from trading in games by making someone fork over their fingerprint - something normally associated with criminals and how you track them.

More and more difficult to casually 'transfer a usage license'/sell a game. No way I'm giving my FINGERPRINT to a private company to get 7 dollars for my Gears of War 2 copy. So the industry wins again as they move towards non-physical downloads anyway.

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:46AM hey buddy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...and yes, I do understand this is currently talking about cash-back transactions, but I'm more talking about the direction this is going - putting people selling used games under a suspicious eye and hence minimizing the sale of used games because it just becomes a 'pain in the ass.'
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 12:21PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No. This has been going on for years in FL and is state mandated as part of the states pawn laws. It's only required for cash trade in's not store credit, also. I've done this process many times and it's not anymore of a hinderance or intrusion than simply trading a game in for store credit. It's simply a layer of security to combat the potential sale of stolen merchandise. I don't think this is the result of any kind of lobbying from the game industry. Like I said this has actually been around for a while in many parts of the state. They have the little thumbprint things in every gamestop and can't take used systems that have the barcode scratched off or unreadable.
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:57AM SpaceFox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All the people saying it's not a very big deal obviously don't live in the Broward area. I do and I gotta say, this really sucks. Giving out my phone number, zip, and address was enough, but now thumbprint? Just one more reason for me to stop selling games to Gamestop.

Posted: May 30th 2009 12:26PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The thing is that it's only when you are getting cash from trade ins. You aren't required to use a pawn shop/game stop and can always use e-bay, amazon or craigslist where it isn't required.
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 11:59AM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I live in FL, and this sucks. It seems you have to give your fingerprints for everything nowadays: Guns, Alcohol, Disney, Video games.
Oh well, I'll just trade my used games in at Amazon, b/c they always fuck up finger print identifications. A friend of mine registered for a concealed weapons license 6 months ago, just last week was he finally told they LOST the fingerprints. Now he has to send them in again.

Posted: May 30th 2009 12:42PM Fokman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Boy am i glad i live in Canada. Asking for fingerprints when trading in games is more than overkill. First off the people comparing Gamestop to a pawn shop seem to have missed out on one specific thing, that being that Gamestop does not offer cash for trade ins, only in store credit. Secondly the reason that Pawn Shops are required to take fingerprints is because if it is found that the items sold to them were stolen they can determine exactly who it is that sold it to them even if they provided fake ID. There is absolutely no way to determine whether or not a game has been stolen seeing as how they don't have any identifying features such as a serial number. There is absolutely no reason for this aside from growing a database and it is simply an inconvenience and an intrusion.

Posted: May 30th 2009 1:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While I'm not sure if GS-Canada has different policies, here in the US you can get cash for a trade. It's generally less than if you took store credit, and in both cases are not worth the time and effort to do so.

At Hastings, a lady told me that they get kids coming in all the time with stolen Walmart games for trade. Still shrinkwrapped and plastered with the Walmart stickers even. So I can understand the reasoning behind such a law.

Of course, it's still a completely incompetent way to try and deter theft. Only some PC games have a serial in the box, and you'd have to open it to get the number. So there's no real way to tell if a game is stolen except through blatantly obvious clues such as intact shrink wraps and price stickers from other retail stores.

If you disagree with it so much, stop trading your games in. It's not like you get anything for them; maybe pennies on the dollar. You can easily play a perfectly good (or bad, in some cases) game for a week or two and save up to buy that shiny new Infamous or Call of Duty 16: More Calls of Duty. I still play games that are 10-15, and even 25+ years old. They're still fun today.
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 12:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually current GameStop policy is very much NOT that. They're now quite strict about stopping illegal trade. A friend of mine said that taking in multiple copies of the same thing (barring things like memory cards for a PS2, where having more than one is logical) is an insta-fire, as is taking something in that is still shrink wrapped.

Posted: May 30th 2009 12:48PM Fokman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cvstos,

Thats kind of interesting to hear. I remember a few years ago one method i used for getting some extra savings on my game purchases was to go to a place like Wal-mart, find their bargain bin, and buy a bunch of copies of a crappy game for like 5 bucks each. I would then go to EBgames and trade em all in for a little bit more (Like 6 or 7 bucks). It didn't save alot of cash but every little bit helps. Kind of disappointing to know that i probably cant do that anymore.
Reply

Posted: May 30th 2009 1:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We just started this bull **** in Sacramento County and due to the lady who processes these forms being a pain in the ass she will now send out officers to stores that make mistakes on the forms(at tax payers expense.)

So rather than solve actual crimes or patrol the streets officers will have to harass Gamestop Associates about a single copy of Madden 2003 even though there is NO WAY to track a single disc.

Posted: May 30th 2009 1:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ummm.. I live in Orlando and as far as I know this has always been required??? Not News to me

Posted: May 30th 2009 2:04PM bestshot9 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Game trading has been treated the same as pawn shop trading in Clark County, WA for as long as I can remember, but at least there you don't have to get thumb printed, you just have to be over 21, which means anyone age 0-20 has to get their parents to trade in games for them, not to bad if you're under 16 or so but anything above that seems kind of... ridiculous.

Posted: May 30th 2009 2:13PM CynicalStrike said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. I just wrote a Criminology essay on something very similar to this. Well, that was to do with preventing credit card fraud by requiring a thumbprint... it's a pointless idea for that, so what's the point for game trade-ins?

Also, if they want to make game stores equal to pawn shops under the law, shouldn't they give the customer the same right... i.e the ability to buy their goods back at the same price?

Posted: May 30th 2009 2:14PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I truly do not understand this.

Posted: May 30th 2009 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dammit I live in Florida.

Not in that area tho, so let's hope this doesn't spread to Orange County.

Posted: May 30th 2009 4:05PM kmcroc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it sounds like a way for the state agency to get your finger prints on to the database of the local & state police & federal. i dont think police of any agency give a damn if gamestop or any company lose a few bucks here & there . thier main concern are your finger prints . .

Posted: May 30th 2009 5:07PM saadskel said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They are just trying to get young people used to this so Big Brother can do more things to spy on ya and they won't think anything of it. ;)

Posted: May 30th 2009 8:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So wait, do you have to give a blood sample to trade in a car?

:P

Posted: May 31st 2009 3:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks for sharing this information. I found it very informative as I have been researching a lot lately on practical matters such as you talk about...

Posted: May 31st 2009 9:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I live in Miami and I've never had to do anything of the sort when trading in games at GS.

Posted: Jun 1st 2009 12:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Any word on if the police have to actually do any work, like say getting a warrant to look at these fingerprints? Or if Gamestop & other pawn shops is required to keep all this stuff secret?

A false positive would cause an individual so much more grief than thousands of thefts from stores. I really can't see how on balance this is good for anyone.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW