| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (849)

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:26PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeah, PSP announcements really dominated this conference.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:26PM Ethan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, do we still think the ps3 slim is real?

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:28PM Firewarrior said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Right now it looks like a no, but E3 isn't over so, I'm so and so.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:27PM MrAhh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
dude your excited to know about Halo reach?? Even tho ODST isn't even out yet? thats like me getting excited for resistance 4 right after they announced 3. Bungie us mass producing Halo titles now.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
That was underwhelming. The only thing that was really new was that lame evolved Eye Toy thing (sorry, but if I wanted all of that I would have purchased a Wii, the same goes for Natal despite the face recognition. If I want to I'll play real tennis/archery/kayaking/painting/whatever. Ugh) and Final Fantasy 14 Online as far as the PS3 goes. PSP had a better listing of new games, but not much was actually shown (and was actually new). Sigh. I was hoping for at least one more big new reveal and FF14 wasn't it for me since I don't care about FF online.

Next year should be a lot more interesting as far as actually new stuff goes since a lot of what was presented will either have dropped or will be old news (this goes for all of the big 3). Here's to hoping.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:31PM Firewarrior said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm pretty sure Sony, MS and Nintendo news still aren't over.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 5:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
True enough. Maybe the devs are going to show cool stuff a bit later on... Hopefully Ubi isn't going to be what the rest of them are like ~__~
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pffft
That's harsh mans

I didnt even watch the Nintendo or Microsoft conferences so don't even know what they're doing. I'm only interested in SONY for the PSP now anyway.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:32PM CaptainProtonX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Overall, nothing tops that cute ass.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:36PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Theres still more to come, I'm sure of it, nothing was mentioned of game rentals, something sony has been interested in.

Price drops will most likely come, but only just before Xmas to push says for the day, makes more sense.

Ps3 slim, well, time can only tell, but if its not finished, why show it? I don't want to see a prototype, I want to see the real thing, with prices and dates.

Posted: Jun 3rd 2009 6:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what your saying is that your a 360 fanboy that wishes he had a ps3, but since you dont. You will come here and moan about crap.

In reality the presentation made you wish you had a ps3, now you will raise a million bullshit points none of which any of us give a shit about..

If you had played any of the games you mentioned you would have loved them :)
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2009 10:28AM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wrong person mate
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:40PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Um... aside from adventure games, news about adventure games, psp information, and SUPPOSEDLY live footage of 20 people on screen in a 250+ capable MMOFPS game... what did we actually see that was good?

Did we see a new FPS announcement? No.

A new MGS? No... just a PSP version, which does nothing for me.

Any exclusive RPG's? No, just more of FFXIII which is multi-platform, and something about an MMO which I don't care about.

Um... so... we saw nothing.

I'm not a fanboy or anything but I expected more... aside from tech demos of cool things, I'd like to actually have a REASON to buy something on the PS3 and so far I have no reason... as the good stuff is on the 360 and the other stuff isn't very good or on the PSP, and the rest of it doesn't exist...

PRess COnferences are for information about things NOT RELEASED yet, not things that are RELEASED already.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:54PM NightElve said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That was a good keynote. A new MGS for my lovely PSP, an exclusive FF and of course GoD
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:58PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Um... aside from adventure games, news about adventure games, psp information, and SUPPOSEDLY live footage of 20 people on screen in a 250+ capable MMOFPS game... what did we actually see that was good?

Did we see a new FPS announcement? No.

"MAG, Killzone 2 DLC, do you really need any more, we want innovation! If you want FPS news that badly, cling onto the hope of a resistance 3"

A new MGS? No... just a PSP version, which does nothing for me

"Rising....its multiplat, just didn't need to be shown again after it was already shown on Xbox, just like AC2 was shown on PS3 and not xbox"

Any exclusive RPG's? No, just more of FFXIII which is multi-platform, and something about an MMO which I don't care about.

"FF14, FF13 Versus, White Knight Chronicles"

Um... so... we saw nothing.

Why show games that don't exist? And none of these games have been released yet, they just don't need to be shown again, whats the point reannouncing Rising or Versus for PS3, we know they exist already, like you said, its the time to show new stuff, and thats what Sony did, just most of the new stuff PS3 related we already know about, no different to Micro or Nintendo, so stop whining.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 5:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No mention of the PS3 slim though quite bummed about that

new logo but no mention of ps3 slim arrggggh
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 5:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
dude,

Assassins Creed 2 was properly demoed, it wasnt shown by MS or ubisoft..
Mod Nation -- First time Ive even heard of it and its really good.
Official trailer for GT5 and its got nascar and world rally ? I wasnt expecting that..
God Of War 3 -- the game looks sick
etc etc..

Its a shame they didnt just release the ps3 slim, that would have been the icing on the cake, I reckon.

I dont like the go its overpriced and its ugly its obsolete hardware.. Does it have a touch screen by any chance ?

Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 5:43PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Did someone just say KZ 2 DLC? KZ 2 had the worst story ever... it was hashed, poor writing at MOST points, had the worst difficulty settings that varied from all points of the game, which was stupid if you knew anything about game design, the testers failed on that part, and since I play games for SP not MP (many people also do so) it doesn't really matter to me...

MAG was announced as an MMO FPS, and no MMO FPS has a story... so no, that really isn't a FPS like Halo, or Resistance, or well very few other good FPS examples (not third person shooters) exist.

White Knight wasn't even TALKED about a tiny trailer I've already seen was inserted into a hash of videos...

A FF MMO is useless as the Online version was poor in my eyes and I don't want an MMO on a console, and the only MMO I'm even looking into is The Old Republic.

So no, new rpg's weren't announced and no exclusives were announced either which makes it unlikely I'll forsake the content, xlive, and achievement systems of the 360 in favor of the PS3, when no exclusivity exists for FFXIII or any other rpg's (though I will buy White Knight, I just wanted more info).

Uncharted and GoW are good sure one's more gorey than the other, one's more story... point taken, but the issue is that what if I don't want more adventure game info, and want info on something else? Adventure games get tiring after all.

No NEW MGS for the PS3, and that means the exclusivity of MGS Lightning Action for the PS3 doesn't exist as it's on the 360 and as such I am more likely to buy it on the 360.

What else...

Sorry but I saw very little to get excited about, aside from the tech demos.

I wanted some new information...

I do still have hopes for Sony in terms of the PS3 games that will be made available, as will be proven by the show floor, hopefully.

But so far it's Microsoft, EA, Nintendo, and Sony.

As the other 3 actually gave new information, announcements, and content.

AC2 yes that was good, but it's not exclusive to the PS3...

Modern Warfare isn't either... and Conviction was shown in Ubisoft again, so why not show a trailer on the particular console instead of just on the others?
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 6:16PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Those are possibly the lamest excuses I have seen all day.

Killzone had the worst story? Name me another shoot em up barring Bioshock this gen that has won awards for story telling? Halo? Are you serious? If it was a Halo you wanted, then why not just say the PS3 lacked a Halo? It has more then enough shooters already.

An FPS is a first person shooter, you are basically saying MAG is not an FPS when it clearly is and you want one, if you want epic story telling, why bother with either of the too you mentioned, neither of them have a story worth mentioning to be quite frank, both basically have the purpose of shooting aliens, might as well not have stories at all, only the dedicated fans pay much attention to the stories to warrant remembering them afterwards. I've played all 3 halos and will play the next and couldn't tell you what the stories were in detail if you asked because for me it was all about shooting what appeared on screen, no different to MAG, except MAG is online based.

Why did they need to talk about white knight? Its already been shown several times before, tiny trailer? You obviously haven't been following it, theres been more then a 'tiny trailer', so that argument fails.

You wanted an RPG? Versus!!!! It just agian doesn't need to be shown, its neither finished nor new. FF14 may be MMO but its still an RPG.

Noone asked you to ditch 360, I haven't ditched mine, I love mine, I just have this profound ability that few people have nowadays to see interesting factors in both consoles for different reasons.

"Adventure games get tiring after all."

Which games don't? FPS'? RPGS? Name one.

"No NEW MGS for the PS3, and that means the exclusivity of MGS Lightning Action for the PS3 doesn't exist as it's on the 360 and as such I am more likely to buy it on the 360".

Its multiplat as far as we know, Kojima did not say it was exclusive to 360 and neither did Microsoft, where did you get that info from, show me proof. It wouldn't have needed to be shown at Sonys if it was already shown at Micros. Thats not new news, PSP MGS is.

"As the other 3 actually gave new information, announcements, and content."

Baffled me here, what information are you talking about? Sony mentioned prices, dates, game info that was relevant, or were you closing your ears to it all?

"AC2 yes that was good, but it's not exclusive to the PS3..."

And yet it wasn't shown at Micros, just like Rising wasn't shown at PS3s and neither was Modern Warfare, how does that make them exclusive but AC2 not?

You changed the argument to suit your personal desires after making a general statement before. Meaning it makes little sense.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 6:35PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
You missed most of my points... but that was probably because you had no idea how to reply...

In any case, AC2 isn't exclusive and as such I am more likely to buy it on the 360, as there is no reason to get it on the PS3, unless they make a reason and with their lack of real content uploads, their online experience, and other issues, it's unlikely...

Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 6:53PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ Velsar: Your point made no sense, which is why I missed it, you said it had nothing to get excited about, I demonstrated, you said no, MMOs don't count and games that are not new and don't have storylines are not worth considering, I said yes they are, because even games with storylines aren't always worth considering, you said Rising was exclusive, I said you're talking nonsense because that wasn't confirmed, you said AC2 wasn't exclusive, I have no idea why, nor do I care which console you prefer to buy it on because to me thats just you pulling the Xbox chain rather then thinking about a resonable argument to back up your claim of rising being exclusive, and some how we went from what E3 PS3 had and didn't have to why you prefer your Xbox. So based on that alone, I have to assume YOU missed the whole point ENTIRELY, your original comment still lacks logic behind it because you are basing it all off your own personal preference now when you were speaking generally before and in turn contradiciting yourself slightly.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 7:08PM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please Velsar, just do yourself a favour and STFU and GTFO.

The more replies you make, the more Maverick owns you
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 7:11PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I never said that Rising was exclusive... look into it again...

I'm simply saying that the PS3, has less going for it in terms of DLC, content, and the online experience, than the 360 has, as proven by the Xbox Live system itself and the reliable achievements... so since PS3 has no real reason to get it over the 360 version, it's more likely to buy it for the 360.

I want to buy things for my PS3, but it gives me no reason to.

Multiplayer games are boring, repetitive, filled with immature idiots by the thousands and more, and essentially are just stupid.

Halo had a story, it was about the Forerunners, and the books, and comics really fleshed it out even more, and yes I'd like more games with SP story, especially FPS's and many FPS's have done well with it, and while you may disagree about Halo, as a Sci-fi writer, having Aliens and shooting them doesn't mean it has no story... sigh.

KillZone 2's story was awful, and I've never seen even a review saying it wasn't, the worst thing is that they still give it good grades just because of the repetitive multiplayer, even when they admit the story is lackluster... which is just stupid but whatever.

In any case, Sony really didn't bring anything new to me, and MANY MANY MANY people don't keep up to date at all the times, so they should flesh out details for lesser known franchises or things which information isn't exactly abundant, such as White Knight and others... because E3 is that time where MANY, a long with the GDC and other conferences, go and listen into so they can get full updates.

In any case, very little was given at Sony that made me want to do anything with my PS3.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 7:12PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Those aren't acronyms, and I don't bother with vulgarities, or immaturity and as such that was worthless post on your part that simply proved yourself of idiocy.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 7:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report

Check out Ratchet and clank a crack in time
Or even Heavy Rain, they didnt even demo them properly in the e3 trailer..
what about uncharted 2: among thieves - I guess that sucked as well

If you want to play halo stick to your 360, dont come bitching about the ps3 because. Of course no game will inspire you to buy stuff for "your ps3" when your a 360 fan.

Dude just do yourself a favour and give up.
Sony has a solid line up, end of..
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 8:03PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
When someone types something and there's many things linked to that statement above it, it's only proper and polite and mature to read all the above, so as not to repeat something that makes no sense.

I never said adventure games suck, and I never said I wanted to play Halo MP or even Halo SP, though I do look forward to the story of ODST and Reach. Nay all I said was that adventure games can get boring if that's all that is constantly produced, for instance Alan Wake will be on the 360 and it will be one adventure game out of few, and no others will be released with it and as such it will not be repetitive, but when you have God of War, inFamous, AND Uncharted it begins to become repetitive.

I'm not a fanboy, I simply like what's good... 360 entices me with good content downloads and dlc, a good selection of demos, and backwards capability... but I still bought the PS3 for Blu-ray, however an issue remains that the DLC for PS3 is quite poor, and the content is less, and it has few exclusives and the control scheme and setup isn't the best for many of their games or ports.

In any case, I just want some reason to actually get it for PS3 rather than the 360 and few reasons exist to influence me to do that... until they do or exclusives exist, I won't be giving them much money.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 8:57PM Ashitaka said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
- Alan Wake will be on the 360 and it will be one adventure game out of few, and no others will be released with it and as such it will not be repetitive, but when you have God of War, inFamous, AND Uncharted it begins to become repetitive. -
LOL. So basically, since the Xbox's line-up is smaller... it's better. Way to go champ. Those 3 games you listed, ALL play out in very, VERY different ways. There's absolutely no chance that playing one would make the other look repetitive/dull/whatever BS you wanna call it.


- I'm not a fanboy, I simply like what's good -
You're certainly not... And you certainly do...


- however an issue remains that the DLC for PS3 is quite poor -
O' RLY? What DLC does Xbox have that PS3 doesn't other than GTA's? But good try though.

- and the content is less, and it has few exclusives and the control scheme and setup isn't the best for many of their games or ports -
Wow! But just.. Wow! Please, stop it, you're upping the bullshit bar too much!

- In any case, I just want some reason to actually get it for PS3 rather than the 360 and few reasons exist to influence me to do that... until they do OR EXCLUSIVES EXIST, I won't be giving them much money. -

Now THIS ONE cracked me up. By no means I intend to start a list wars but.. It's just that there are so many exclusives that I'm bound to start one. For starters, you just listed 3 in your original post - God of War, inFamous, AND Uncharted - if these aren't enough, then you REALLY are out of your mind. Then, there's:

Ratchet & Clank
LBP
MAG
KILLZONE
Resistance
Motorstorm
GT4
Heavy Rain
and the (still) great MGS4 that can still (and will) kick the new Splinter Cell right in the face.

Honestly, you must be out of your mind for thinking that the PS3 has nothing to offer.

Oh, and as a disclaimer.. Yeah, I'm a ps3 fanboy.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 9:08PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
First off, I meant exclusives in regards to rpg's and GOOD FPS's, as KZ2 had an awful story, and Resistance 2 was good but well had some issues, same with R1 though moreso on their SP issues.

Adventure games in general are rare on the 360 and when they come out they don't spray out like a broken pinata with its candy, because if they did it'd become very repetitive and dull.

inFamous is an Adventure Game, and Uncharted is also, oh and MGS4 isn't anything compared to Conviction as it's TWO DIFFERENT GENRES... and thus you don't compare them, oh and God of War is also an adventure, and because they all PLAY like adventure game, it well becomes repetitive.

MAG has no story, it's an MMO (and has been referred to as such by the press) and thus it really isn't that interesting.

So far I just keep getting replies from people who don't read or have no idea what they're typing about.

Sigh.

Oh and the 360 has INFINITELY MORE CONTENT than the PS3 does, and no one can deny that, Xbox Live after all has a massive amount of DLC and patches, while PS3 has few and far between, especially on the patches... and while the Fallout 3 content is coming like 6 months after released to the PS3, massive amounts of additional content exist on the Xbox.

Trophies are few and far between on PS3, while every game has achievements on the 360 and that brings a sense of accomplishment for some games that craft it well.

I like games that are good and I want to play them when they are good and have the best potential, the 360 has that... PS3 has few that act as such... when they have some more, and some exclusives worth buying, then I'll play them, as I do, like the case of inFamous, though many gameplay bugs and glitches have been confirmed...
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2009 8:33AM Ashitaka said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
KILLZONE2 and Resistance2 are awesome. Period. You can keep your Halo and Gears of War.

MAG is an MMO as much as Mass Effect is an RPG. NEWSFLASH: they're both shooters.

Again, besides the GTA4 DLC, PS3 has the same content as the 360.

Trophies and achievements are for whores. Still, as of 2009, ALL PS3 games include trophies, and many of the games released before 2009 were (and still are being) patched to include trophies.

Like I said before, inFAMOUS, Uncharted1/2 and God Of War III have NOTHING to do with each other. They all play out in VERY DIFFERENT WAYS, so STFU. The Halo franchise and Gears are bound to bring more repetitiveness to the 360 than the games you mentioned will ever bring to the PS3. Stop being jealous because they're exclusive and because nothing on the 360 will ever come close to what those 3 games will achieve.

Stupid fanboy, you really couldn't be more dead wrong
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2009 11:16AM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hi, its me again :D

"I never said that Rising was exclusive... look into it again..."

"No NEW MGS for the PS3, and that means the exclusivity of MGS Lightning Action for the PS3 doesn't exist as it's on the 360 and as such I am more likely to buy it on the 360."

"A new MGS? No... just a PSP version, which does nothing for me."

Thats what you said right, or am I just going blind? By 'no' new mgs, that means that you are implying PS3 has no new MGS coming out, which disregards Rising which was demonstrated on Xbox but not PS3 but for good reasoning, it was already on PS3 as far as we know, and they debuted it on Xbox as well. DEBUT does not = EXCLUSIVE, check it out on Wikipedia or dictionary.com

"I'm simply saying that the PS3, has less going for it in terms of DLC, content, and the online experience, than the 360 has, as proven by the Xbox Live system itself and the reliable achievements... so since PS3 has no real reason to get it over the 360 version, it's more likely to buy it for the 360."

Only in your opinion, if you said that to explain why you prefer your 360, then you are entitled to have your own personal preferences, but you're not, again you are speak general, again you are in a PS3 E3 thread stating that Xbox has better stuff and E3 showed nothing, which makes no sense because I and several others here saw something, you just closed your eyes off to them, but I bet you had your eyes open to see Splinter Cell and Left 4 Dead, of course you did, they are both on Xbox, fanboyism allows you to do so, it has the ability to block your mind from seeing anything on other consoles, making your opinions in PS3 related articles as valid as turd.

"I want to buy things for my PS3, but it gives me no reason to."

You don't even give me the idea you have one, nobody is stupid enough to spend that amount of money on a PS3 and not be able to to find anything decent to say about it. I love all three of my consoles, including my PSP which isn't one, and the only one I often slam is the Wii because although I say its mine, its actually only partially mine, it belongs to the family, I can't sell it even if I wanted to. The other 2 are mine and I can think of plenty great things to buy for them and have no issues. If you ACTUALLY spent money on a PS3, you would be showering it with praises at the moment because PS3s are too expensive to own and slam.

"Multiplayer games are boring, repetitive, filled with immature idiots by the thousands and more, and essentially are just stupid."

Yup, I'm sure they are, they do have you in them after all coming up with reasons as to why your Xbox is better, I'm sure you piss most people off in PS3 multiplayer games.

"Halo had a story, it was about the Forerunners, and the books, and comics really fleshed it out even more, and yes I'd like more games with SP story, especially FPS's and many FPS's have done well with it, and while you may disagree about Halo, as a Sci-fi writer, having Aliens and shooting them doesn't mean it has no story... sigh."

It shouldn't need comics or books to fleash it out, only the fanboys go reading the books of the game, I shouldn't have to read a book to get interested in the universe, Bioshock did that perfectly. Halo, did not and neither did Resistance.

"KillZone 2's story was awful, and I've never seen even a review saying it wasn't, the worst thing is that they still give it good grades just because of the repetitive multiplayer, even when they admit the story is lackluster... which is just stupid but whatever."

Hypocrite!!! Its only as awful as Halo and Resistance, elite force of soliders fight against an alien race, the Helghast, exactly like Halo. They too could come up with a comic and book and it still wouldn't make the plot in -game better.

"In any case, Sony really didn't bring anything new to me, and MANY MANY MANY people don't keep up to date at all the times, so they should flesh out details for lesser known franchises or things which information isn't exactly abundant, such as White Knight and others... because E3 is that time where MANY, a long with the GDC and other conferences, go and listen into so they can get full updates."

And Microsoft or Nintendo did? Hypocrite again!

"I never said adventure games suck"

No, you said they get tiring, and still haven't answered my question, "Which games don't?"

"Story of ODST and Reach."

Of course you do, you are a 360 fanboy after all

"Nay all I said was that adventure games can get boring if that's all that is constantly produced,"

Oh no you didn't, you said they get tiring and left it at that without proper explanation.

"For instance Alan Wake will be on the 360 and it will be one adventure game out of few, and no others will be released with it and as such it will not be repetitive"

Whaa? What kind of theory is that? Adventure is adventure, it only gets boring if you ACTUALLY buy all of the adventure games, even then, God of war plays nothing like Uncharted and Uncharted plays nothing like heavenly sword, more proof you haven't played any of them. Alan Wake is more of a clone of Silent hill with new methods of gameplay if you want to get gritty.

"I'm not a fanboy, I simply like what's good..."

Yup, 360 games. Fanboy denial, they all say that.

"360 entices me with good content downloads and dlc, a good selection of demos, and backwards capability... but I still bought the PS3 for Blu-ray, however an issue remains that the DLC for PS3 is quite poor, and the content is less, and it has few exclusives and the control scheme and setup isn't the best for many of their games or ports."

Content is less? Hasn't bothered me. Few exclusives? Are you serious? Have you seen the line up? Control scheme what? What are you going on about, your facts are all jumbled.

"In any case, I just want some reason to actually get it for PS3 rather than the 360 and few reasons exist to influence me to do that"

And you are foolish for doing so, you spent money on something you don't like and still have it to moan about.

"Adventure games in general are rare on the 360 and when they come out they don't spray out like a broken pinata with its candy, because if they did it'd become very repetitive and dull."

Again, irrelevant info

"MAG has no story, it's an MMO (and has been referred to as such by the press) and thus it really isn't that interesting."

To you alone, to me, MAG will kick ass, so while you sit back slamming it, I'll be playing it and forget you even existed, the fact you won't be playing it makes it even better, it won't have you in it moaning and ranting about pointless things and ruining the experience for other MAG gamers.

"So far I just keep getting replies from people who don't read or have no idea what they're typing about."

Dude, you just summed yourself up

"Oh and the 360 has INFINITELY MORE CONTENT than the PS3 does, and no one can deny that, Xbox Live after all has a massive amount of DLC and patches, while PS3 has few and far between, especially on the patches... and while the Fallout 3 content is coming like 6 months after released to the PS3, massive amounts of additional content exist on the Xbox."

And who cares other then you? I too have access to that, or are you forgetting I have the same console, and to me, its all about quality, not all of the content thats on XBL I will even have remote interest in, I don't use Netflix, I use my blu-ray player, I won't be using Facebook app, I have it on my PS3 browser, I play remote play on my PSP to PS3 which I can't do on my 360. So while XBL is better overall, PS3 still has bonuses over 360 for ME, not for anyone else, just me, likewise, 360 beats PS3 hands down for you, and only you (including other 360 fanboys) in this arguement.

"Trophies are few and far between on PS3, while every game has achievements on the 360 and that brings a sense of accomplishment for some games that craft it well."

irrelevant and unproven

"I like games that are good and I want to play them when they are good and have the best potential, the 360 has that... PS3 has few that act as such... when they have some more, and some exclusives worth buying, then I'll play them, as I do, like the case of inFamous, though many gameplay bugs and glitches have been confirmed..."

Again, irrelevant and unproven

Basically your argument fails in all areas because it is easy to see you are 100% xbox fanboy, don't actually own a PS3 because you've given me no inclination that you do, everything you've stated is either irrelevant or unproven, Infamous has glitches? Where? I haven't encountered any yet, tell me and I'll gladly investigate, maybe you have a faulty copy. Can't be the same infamous I played, the one I played was incredible and easily the best superhero/villain game I've ever played. But again, thats MY opinion. You lack facts and thus you lack credibility, best thing to do, stay quiet unless you have something decent to say with proof.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2009 11:19AM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Velsar once again lacks proof and credibility and is in denial about being a fanboy of 360 who does not even own a PS3.

I think that just about sums you up :D
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 4:58PM BiggRapp313 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
agreed

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 5:01PM jhowlett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
woah. i saw a whole lot i'm looking forward to from sony. i loved it. i'll be getting a sexy black psp soon. sorry 360, maybe a holiday sale.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 7:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PSP..Go is a utter massive god-damn shame. See that WIIIIIDE open space above the stick and select/start?....

That is where the select/start should of been, with a SECOND stick replacing it! Since Sony dumped the mechanical gears of the UMB, there should be huge gapping holes even in that smaller frame to accommodate it! What the Fuck, why not go for the Huge prize and screw nintendo one big with a huge TOUCH screen as well?! It'll and would've been the ds / iphone Killer!!! speaking of which the iphone has sold millions at a nutty price to boot, in Japan (maybe europe) Skype can be installed into the PSP and that would be a incredible incentive for most tight waded folks nowadays for buying the PSP at a higher price for not only music and games, but also for phone calls and texting!!!!

Sony.. you all dropped a new huge lump of shit with this new "improved" psp.. Huge...

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 5:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No mention of the PS3 slim though quite bummed about that

new logo but no mention of ps3 slim arrggggh

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 5:50PM ptcamn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Sony Press Conference was good. I enjoyed what they showed. Good games coming out and, more importantly, lots of creativity. Even with the "leaks" there were good demonstrations.

I wasn't impressed by Microsoft's presentation except for the Natal project (but not by the "kid" demo which is probably one of the worst ideas for a possible game). All their presentation was full of the same games coming back for more (how many Halo "side games" can there be?) and mostly the same genres- action or FPS. Conviction looked pretty but the mechanics looked like a mash up of Gears of War, Uncharted, and even some of Infamous on the Splinter Cell story. The rest of the announcements I just didn't care about (Facebook, Twitter, a not very good looking multiplayer Kart game?

Nintendo was, as usual, more of the same. This year we didn't have the Wii Balance board but rather a finger pulse reader apparently. Nintendo is officially the "healthiest" machine. The rest were more Wii games for the same franchises they have been exploiting for decades with the DS receiving more love in terms of originality. Bland presentation.

Sony presentation's didn't have a shocking moment but it was good. There's something to be said for Sony being more open to original games. Yes, there are sequels coming, but if you look at the lineup here, what has come out before, and what will come up soon, we have the most creative and original library of games in the industry (flow, flower, Echochorme, Everyday Shooter, Fat Princess, LBP, PJ:Eden, the new Kart game, etc).

Overall, good presentation. The most interesting of the three.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 7:12PM Ashitaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Couldn't agree more with you.

To me, this is the comment that summarises E3 the best so far.
Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 5:38PM Haohmaru said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, Final Fantasy XIV Online! Wasn't expecting that! Being a huge fan of FFXI, I'm extremely excited about an update. Wonder if it'll still take place in Vana'diel.

Okay, with announcements like Super Mario Galaxy 2, New SMB Wii, and Team Ninja Metroidon Wii, The Last Guardian and FFXIV on PS3, and Metal Gear Solid: Rising and Crackdown 2 on 360, it's hard for me to declare a winner this year. Well done, big three. Well done.

Next stop, TGS. :3

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 5:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. That was quite an amazing showing for Sony this year at E3. I watched all 3 live feeds of the 3 conferences off of Gamespot's E3 page and Sony really went all out to impress. Though most of the new "shocker" announcements were prematurely leaked, it's still quite a LOT of tangible software titles as well as hardware. MGS for the PSP that ISN'T a side story?!? That by itself is incredible news. FF 14?!? I can't wait, it's been LONG overdue for another FF MMORPG. Comparing apples to apples, Sony really packed that show with a LOT of new products and MORE exclusives that MS. The wii had a good showing as well but it doesn't really appeal to the gamers which is fine because it really has it's own demographics. Great showing, I think Sony is well on it's way to gaining pole position over MS this year as well as 2010.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 6:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ssssooo..........no new avatars or in game hat REALLY SONY!

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 6:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
when will the music app come out?????

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 6:26PM mgarc1125 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought Sony pretty much matched Microsoft even though a lot of what they showed has been released throughout the year. Had a lot of it not been shown throughout the year it would have appeared to have blown out the other two. The only thing I wish they had showed would have been stereoscopic 3D.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 7:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yes indeed enrique,

uncharted 2 looked awesome, first day buy right there..
that car racing game first day buy..
god of war 3 first day buy
mag probably first day buy..
Ratchet and clank crack in time - first day buy (im watching it on gamespot right now - it looks awesome)

this is getting ridiculous :)

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 7:58PM Misfit Toy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I own the 3 consoles but I am generally a fan of the 360. But I have to say Sony did a really good job with their conference. Some lul points to be sure, but then again Microsoft had the worlds longest intro with the Beatles Rock Band. Still, I am excited by what both companies have to offer in the future. And I think we all agree...once again this year Nintendo got spanked. If their conference was any more sterile the audience would be wearing scrubs and rubber gloves.

The good news for us is that the competition is heating up and that only means better things to come. Good on Microsoft and Sony.

And thank goodness they're spreading the games and they aren't all dropping in the Fall.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 8:11PM erh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I own a PS3, and I still couldn't care less. How many years have we been waiting for some of these games, like Gran Turismo? I stopped caring.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 9:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Evan:

I agree. I also own all three and the only 2 games I was excited about and I'll get are GoW 3 and GT5, and this is AFTER I play through Forza Motorsport 3!! They just took too damn long with these that the excitement faded and was replaced with when are we finally going to get to play them?

The rest of the conference was solid, but the wow factor has to go to Project Natal with Milo. Known celebrities, good exclusive games as well as a bomb announcement from Microsoft this year. Sonys was good but couldn't beat that.

Posted: Jun 2nd 2009 10:37PM ColorblindMonk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The motion controls really takes a new step into innovation, but I like Natal a bit better. While Natal is just one peripheral, needing something for the other to work just goes a bit over simple, but just annoying. But! I can't deny that it's god damn innovative. I've dreamed of getting into the feel of sword fighting within my living room!

All in all, I'm surprised. it's something interesting to look out for when I get my PS3 sometime this year.

Posted: Jun 3rd 2009 12:56AM davedrastic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, yes, very nice show, but you forgot to mention how big and when the price drop will be for PS3, and PSP3000 for that matter. Nice games, I really would love to go out and buy some as soon as you make the platforms affordable.

Posted: Jun 3rd 2009 10:39AM mahouneko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That reminds me, what happened to Joystiq's Sony Bingo Card?

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW