Mario vs. Donkey Kong Minis March Again in a week

If your curiosity is piqued, you've only got a week to wait.


Editor-in-Chief
Managing Editor
Senior Editor
East Coast Editor
West Coast Editor
Reviews Editor
Contributing Editor
Contributing Editor
Contributing Editor
Contributing Editor
Contributing Editor
Contributing Editor
Contributing Editor
Contributing Editor
Contributing Editor
All contents copyright © 2003-2010, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
Joystiq is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Lustis @ Jun 2nd 2009 1:02PM
Dun dun dun!
DaveMcRae the Haiku Artist @ Jun 2nd 2009 1:01PM
yay, I guess?
MaRRODkez @ Jun 2nd 2009 1:12PM
Yay, I guess, is probably about right. The 1st one was fun, albeit pretty easy. Not something I would've expected a sequel out of. I suppose with a game like this it's pretty easy to just make another.
Aero @ Jun 2nd 2009 1:17PM
Wait, that is literally the same game as March of Minis that I already have on my shelf. This isn't a new game at all it's just an old one released as a downloadable one.
Savage Turtle @ Jun 2nd 2009 1:43PM
And that one had a level creator as well. Unless there is a redone single player mode we haven't heard about, 'Minis March Again' sorta seems like 'Minis Marched Already'
Special K @ Jun 2nd 2009 2:05PM
How about a brand new single player mode with 100 NEW levels, and redone gameplay to be different and more fun. In addition to a level editor that you can share levels WITHOUT friend codes.
Does that sound better?
burgerbat @ Jun 2nd 2009 11:01PM
How do you know this? Or are you just being a stupid piece of shit?
Maulok @ Jun 2nd 2009 2:07PM
I really liked March of the Minis, but not enough to pony up for a DSi (and give up my GBA port!) for its sequel.
Rob Accomando @ Jun 2nd 2009 5:24PM
Yes! More Mario
barc0de @ Jun 2nd 2009 7:31PM
Can they PLEASE just do an effing sequel to Donkey Kong on the gameboy? Please don't tell me March of the Minis is the same thing, or even similar, because it isn't.