| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (116)

Posted: Jun 8th 2009 6:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't understand how this will work without buttons. If I want to shoot a gun, I currently make a VERY small movement that can be recognized by the system virtually instantaneously. Why would I want to have to make some gesture that the sustem may or mayu not recognize?

I just don't understand the excitement unless we're talking about some party games and whatnot. Why anyone would want to use this for an FPS or Gears of War is completely beyond me.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:24PM Namminamm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the ps3 atready has its own natal if you think about it. it has the PlayStarton eye which is baicly the same thing. they are just adding the new controllerst to the eye so you can get natal + super wiimotes = PS eye and motion controllers
Reply

Posted: Jun 8th 2009 4:43PM ll features ll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Man..... American's are a stingey lot, $50 is about £20 -£25 (Economy Permitting), I would realistically expect this to fetch for about as much as Rock band or an extra hard drive £69.99 and thats a good bit more than your poor assed currencies $100.......

You guys should come over to Dublin; the price of a coke would give you a stroke!

Posted: Jun 8th 2009 4:52PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Our economy and pricing is not equal to yours. Just because something is more expensive in your market it does not follow that it should be so here.
Reply

Posted: Jun 8th 2009 9:32PM Beloved Console said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We have to pay for all our own health insurance.
Reply

Posted: Jun 8th 2009 5:25PM Softserve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait, hasn't this guy been saying PS3 would be on top by now...? Which is it? lol

Posted: Jun 8th 2009 6:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The main difference here is that the Natal and PS motion wands are motion-gaming PERIPHERALS while the Wii is a motion-gaming CONSOLE. Until MS and Sony rebrand their consoles to be completely motion-gaming, I doubt they will affect Wii's sales.

Posted: Jun 8th 2009 7:29PM ekon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I sat here and sung the wiimote waggle rap..i dont know why but it lasted for like 2 min...

AINT NO WAGGLE LIKE THA WIIMOTE WAGGLE CUUUUHHZZZZZ
DA WIIMOTE WAGGLE DONT STOP!!! (repeat 15x's)

Posted: Jun 8th 2009 9:32PM Xocolatl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm much more interested in putting a Natal-like gesture recognition on my PC than a 360. I crave the day when I can plug the display onto my TV instead of my tiny monitor, sit back on the couch, and browse the net with an air keyboard. (Too bad Linux will probably never get this).

And I hope they will let me strangle that damn paperclip Office helper.

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 1:34AM Ex14 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I have to agree...I really dun see MS or Sony will overtake th wii for this gen...esp with both of them JUST coming out....Furthurmore, developers take time to make quality games for this kind of controls.

And a very offtopic comment but if i have to say which company's moiton sensing i find more promising, i would have to say it's Natal. Sony's motion sensing looks quite similar to the wii (it requires a controller)

If natal works well, it would probably change the next gen consoles of the future.

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 4:02PM Namminamm said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
you do relise that sony´s new controllers work with the playstation eye (a perfected version of the eyetoy)which CAN TRACK YOUR WHOLE BODY and those little ball controllers. what you most likely meant was: mocrosofts motion sensing looks quite similar to the eyetoy (it cant use a motion controller)
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 1:36AM Ex14 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
so why not do it? IMHO i think sony should have perfected the Eye toy rather than make another wii-estque thing. I mean why do u need a controller?

MS vision of using just ur body is more appealing rather than to have to hold a controller.

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 3:56PM Namminamm said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@ Ex14 : you do relise that sony DID perfect the Eyetoy with its slitly old playstation eye bfor the PS3(its 2 years old) wich is better than natal (it can track YOUR WHOLE BODY and those little ball controllers) while natal can ONLY track your body.

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 4:58PM Ducarta said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All they need is

A. Good marketing

B. A Killer app

and Nintendo will have every cause to be worried.

Seriously, people will pay for perceived value hence why I left out price

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:03AM pulgathagreat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well microsoft practically copied our wii community now they copy the nintendo wii-mote controller. And sony copied the super nintendo controller and added extra shoulder buttons and other things. why cant they be innovators themselves?

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 9:36AM Pookiewood said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Excuse me but your "Wii-nis" is showing. Badass!! LOL!! :p

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW