| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (69)

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:17PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So we are all going to be compelled to buy 2 copies because it will be that amazing?
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:21PM CaptainProtonX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You already have it. Activision found your gamertag and auto charged the game to your account.

Expext enlistment on day one.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 7:01PM fanchax said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bye money
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:18PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I just went to gamestop and when they asked some guy if he wanted to preorder anything the clerk said "Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2" Even if it isn't the title I think it will be a lot more obvious than people think
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:24PM Joeybeast said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I have a feeling that Activision will at least put a sticker on the box saying "From the creators of 'Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare'".

If I was Activision I wouldn't take the risk of not having the 'Call of Duty' brand at all.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:24PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
speaking about preordering modern warfare 2, did any of the clerks in your local gamestops mention a beta for MW2 on all ps3, 360, and PC? because when i went to preorder it, they said to come back later because gamestop is gonna have exclusive beta codes for those consoles. i just want to make sure it's true, since it hasn't been reported on joystiq.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 9:04PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sorry sly, the guy said no so the clerk didnt elaborate.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Considering MAG comes out the same month... I'd rather play MAG.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not a gambling man, but I'd be willing to bet you are in the EXTREME minority there. In fact, thanks for letting me know both are coming out in the same month, because now I know for sure MAG will flop.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:34PM MrAdam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm also leaning towards MAG. I played a crapload of COD 4, and will play it again (I'm too busy playing inFamous and Killzone 2 right now), but MAG is just different enough that it is more enticing to me.

I probably won't make my decision until after I've watched gameplay of the final product of each game, but I prefer large levels and MAG is almost guaranteed to have nothing but large levels. I never enjoyed the small maps on COD 4 - probably because I suck and can't hide from the firefight in a small level.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Goddamnit, tmac! Stop making me agree with you so much today!
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:46PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm GameFly'ing both...

Never been much of a CoD fan but I do like CoD4 better than W@W so I will try MW2 out and I might "Keep it" if I get hooked....already know I will end up Keeping MAG because its made by Zipper and Zipper did good things with SOCOM
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:05PM NaeemTHM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait what! MAG is launching in the same YEAR as Modern Warfare 2? Are they out of their minds?

I've followed both MAG and MW2 closely this E3 and all signs point to MAG being quite ho-hum as a overall FPS.

I mean yes it will allow an insane amount of players to duke it out online, but apparently you won't even see the other 100 or so players. Instead it will just be your team of 8 vs another team of 8. So while there is an epic battle going on, you're basically confined to a small portion of the map.

Someone PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong about this. I really want to have the ability to run across a monstrous map and watch a fucking 200 person war unfold.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:09PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm a little bit worried about MAG. I've heard chatter about how the game was lagging like a mother at E3. I've also heard a lot of people say that it felt very generic while they were playing it. Hopefully being a commander will differentiate the experience from games like Battlefield 2.

Oh, and I may be nuts here, but if you use your tentative title for two E3's in a row, doesn't it become your real title? Could they change it from MAG to something else at this point? I have a hard time imagining the marketing push for the "Massive Action Game" compared to, say, "Modern Warfare 2".
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MAG is looking very rough. Everyone has been reporting that the E3 demo had a lot of lag and, yes there is 256 players but no one actually saw anything more than what looked like 16 vs 16. So if that's the case, what's the point of advertising 256 players? If it's just to give you a feel that you're a small part of a larger battle without actually letting you have a massive battle, then I have to stand up and call bullshit on the hyping of having 256 players.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 7:36PM Morisato said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Do your research. YOU CAN explore the entire map where all 256 players are present, so yes you will be able to see everyone, and no you will NOT be confined to a small area.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 9:49PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do your research. YOU CAN explore the entire map where all 256 players are present, so yes you will be able to see everyone, and no you will NOT be confined to a small area.

The question is, will MAG be practical? Will you actually meet up with another 256 people in a server without having to wait forever until everyone has a stable connection?
This hasn't even been done on PC, to be honest, I would be very surprised if MAG worked like imagined.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 11:04PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@moris - That would completely defeat the purpose of having a commander and objectives to complete. You could run all over the map, but if everyone did that, I don't think winning would be possible.

I can't speak for him, but I think what he's trying to say is that while there may be 256 players, you will never feel like there are 256 players. I'm hoping for the exact opposite, and I think the game absolutely hinges on how well it can make you feel like the things you are doing actually matter.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:25PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
ya know what...I dont doubt that it WILL sell better than W@W as COD 4 is far better than that.....but its getting old...They might as well pull an EA Sports and just Call ot "Call of Duty 2010" and just go from there...
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
But you see, you don't buy the yearly ones....just the IW ones, so once every 2 years.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:39PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea infinity Ward does make the better game...
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2009 12:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So far:

IW > Treyarch

But Activision/IW are making it kind of hard when it announces temporary exclusive map pack DLC for the Xbox 360 when the game won't even release for several months.

Thanks Microsoft. What would we do without you.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I might buy two copies, for the PS3 and 360, its gunna be THAT good.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:32PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ill get it for the PC and the 360... just like CoD2 and CoD4.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:39PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll buy two copies for the PC, because the PC kicks ass and so does this franchise. Well, I can give the copy to my bro. : )
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I guess I got low ranked cuz I have both systems?
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People suck like that, Beast.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 7:07PM Inect said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
No because you showed no sign of fanboyism.

BASTARD!!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh activision. You are so evil that you make me hand my money over to Gamestop without thinking twice. I can patiently wait a week or two for a used copy if it means not giving them my money.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:30PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
im confused, do you not want to give gamestop money or activison?
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:31PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You would rather give fucking gamestop ur money? Activision is the lesser of the two evils in my book and i really dislike activision with their milking of every good franchise.

God i hate you Tmac
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually I have no issue with Gamestop, as I've never had a bad experience at the one near me. I would much rather have a used game retailer than something like full digital distribution, where prices rarely ever go down and when they do it's a special 1 week deal.

But the people running Activision are true scum of the earth, and the thought of my money helping to pay for Bobby's golden chandelier in his mammoth mansion hurts my honor and pride.

@JXC

Why so serious? Do you work for Inifinity Ward? I have nothing against them personally, but unfortunately for them they're under Activision.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:59PM Dirty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Death to ...... eh you know the rest.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:07PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have always thought used games sales have hurt the industry as a whole. Where it be IW or a dev i like less. I dont want only digital distribution either but as someone that uses steam, it is nice to be able to play the game i bought on any computer in my house without having to move disks.

My problem with gamestop is that the devs work hard making their games and the publishers spend time pushing them out to the masses but the used sales retailers made 100% of the difference with little to no effort. If i like a dev, i will ways buy a game new. thats just me tho
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:17PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EA is evil, Activision is evil, what publisher isn't evil at this point?

Both of them are still less evil than GameStop. The first time they denied me the purchase of a game because I didn't pre-order, when it was obvious that they had a million copies, was the last time I ever went there. That they bent EB Games over a table, and did unspeakable things to Babbages, is just icing on the cake (I can't remember exactly what happened).

Actually, that isn't true. I was searching for a used copy of Ico last week because my original copy is getting long in the tooth (and scratched to hell) and I found one with Gamestop's website inventory checker. I got there and it was a mint copy with a box and manual that was probably only played once. It didn't have any stickers on it yet, and it was only 20 bucks (compare with the going price on Ebay: 40+ dollars for one in decent condition). I now love that particular gamestop and want to have its children, but I still hate the company.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:28PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love it because IW wants this to be separated from the work that Treyarch does, rightfully so, and Activision basically says "Yea yea call it what you want, just make us a shitload of money" so IW is like "ok now lets advertise the hell out of this as MW2" but they guys at Activision will call it Call of Duty 6
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Infinity Ward is basically all that has kept me from being able to boast a total Activision boycott for almost two years.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:31PM Mazrael said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Activision: Modern Warfare 2 set to eclipse previous Call of Duty games" especially the Treyarch ones....
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
hour 1 purchase for me
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:42PM Alex R said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Poor Treyarch. I bet they feel pathetic.

PS, Is it pronounced Trey-arch, or Trey-ark?
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:51PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yes...that is how it is pronounced...
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:54PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Probably the latter.... but TreyArch continues to get a bad rap. W@W is a very good game. The 4-player campaign co-op was a blast as is the zombies mode. CoD4 may have better MP, but I can't really comment on that as I don't care about it. I don't play much MP, but when I do I prefer larger scale games.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:04PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i agree vidikron, Treyarch added tons of stuff people were begging for, and a whole lot more too. Now IW wont even gives us co-op! In GI they said it would "break the narrative" Who cares about CoD's story? It's stupid, it's the same faux future military thing we've played in every Tom Clancy game/movie/book ever, just give us fucking co op.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:53PM PXLT said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Loved COD4, buying MW2 on day 1...

but all I know is, I'm really going to miss sniping with an unscoped bolt-action. Treyarch made a pretty great game (even if it was 99% due to IW's work)
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2009 10:28PM Boomzilla said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ pixelate

Just play hardcore and you can snipe with any weapon you want.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:44PM mattprime86 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully the editor finds this topic and fires the writer for spelling and grammar issues..........
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 7:41PM Look At This Suit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So basically, what you're saying is "Fire Justin McElroy!"?

How original!
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 8:57PM mattprime86 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i dont get it?

has this been said before?

but yeah, hes clearly half retarded, all of his posts are riddled with typos
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 5:44PM acme64 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
its gonna keep being referred to as COD until IW leaves activision for another publisher, then the lawyers will step in like a pack of hungry nazi dogs that jump at you and kill you with one bite even if you kill one there's like 4 more waiting for you.....sorry where was I?
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2009 6:06PM yo Naturale said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If Infinity Ward leaves Activision, more than likely they'd have to leave behind both the Call of Duty and the Modern Warfare titles, being that they are Intellectual Properties owned by Activision. That doesn't mean IW couldn't be contracted to make another MW game for Activision. Sort of like Bungie making Halo:Reach for Microsoft (MS owns the Halo IP, not Bungie).

Which sort of goes into my lower-thread point. As long as Activision treats them as single franchise (CoD and MW) by stopping online support of one (No maps for you! Next!) as soon as the new is released the next year, it matters not if Call of Duty is still printed on the box sleeve.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW