| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (42)

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, that's not entirely accurate...
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:01PM Snowblind said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Crystal Chronicles games have all been pretty good, although they've had more of a focus on loot collecting and multiplayer, the universe is great and the different races are among the best in the series.

A more single player focused game is definitely a good thing.. I'm almost looking forward to this more than XIII.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I gave up on the numbered FF's after 8.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because you knew that nothing would top VIII? I feel the same.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:37PM Da Largest said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Then you missed the best one, Cody.

(Of course, I'm speaking of FFIX)
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:59PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IX was far superior to VIII.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 3:03PM Da Largest said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IX was far superior to (insert any other FF game here).
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 3:16PM dreganfyre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"IX was far superior to..."

I was thinking the same thing. :) Easily one of my favorites. I wasn't really that fond of VIII...
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 4:07PM JXCGunrunna said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
My favs in this order are:
VII
IV(NA)
XI
X
II
the rest were really not worth playing

havent played XI but thats cuz im not into MMO's
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 6:21PM zerokku said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ JXCgunrunna

Wait a minute... So you're telling me that VI, the game considered the best in the series by many people, is not worth playing. Despite the fact that VII borrows half of it's plot points from VI?

lolwut?
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 6:31PM Railgun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you didn't play IX Cody, then you're really missing out.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2009 7:08AM Snowblind said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IX is one of the best in the series, assuming you've played the previous games. There's a lot of nods and references to the older ones that will really make you smile.

Personally, the only ones I didn't like were X and XII. But unlike most people I actually enjoyed the story and characters in XII (sans Vann). My only issue was with the battle system, it's just.. not fun.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want to see story details.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I feel grateful, and it almost feels like my duty to stick to Nintendo"

Pretty much how every developer should feel about them. You know, developers that enjoy making money.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:39PM Da Largest said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Some developers enjoy making good games as well as making money, though.

That's kind of difficult on the Wii.

Unless you're Nintendo, of course.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:30PM kevlar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am not much of a fan of traditional JRPGs. I do enjoy them from time to time, and have played parts of some of the other FFs, but Crystal Chronicles for the GC, despite being a pain to get people together and organize, was probably my best FF experience to date. Me and my friends co-oped the sh!t out of that game.
It was fun from start to finish.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:36PM matias said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
SE exists because of nintendo, if it wasn't for the nes and snes FF wouldn't exist, of course they should be grateful to them, all gaming companies and gamers should.

I'm looking forward to this more than FFXIII (even if I'm going to get XIII anyways because I'm desperate to play jrpgs), I don't like numbered FF since VI. They should release another tactics game, but in the original ivalice, with politics, knights, big wars, and all that.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:43PM cyruszuo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game, from seeing it at E3 doesn't play anything like an RPG. It's much closer to Zelda, and in my mind that is a good thing. It was pretty impressive! (except for not being able to skip the cut scene at the beginning which ran like 5 minutes and was all in Japanese!)
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:45PM Da Largest said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game sounds kind of cool, actually. It's not traditional Final Fantasy, sure (at this point, is that even a bad thing?), but it definitely looks interesting.

"That made us change our target audience -- we have to create something that will appeal to casual gamers."

Hopefully this doesn't mean the game is simplified to a point that those of us who like deeper games are turned off by Crystal Bearers.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 2:58PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Present and past tense; learn how to use it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 3:00PM chargen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The protagonist himself does not grow -- he's a superhero from the very beginning. But you can customize his accessories which will supplement his super power. That would give him more strength or defense power. With those accessories, his attacks could reach farther."

That doesn't sound like much of an RPG, then. Even Prototype has more customization and advancement.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 3:19PM Da Largest said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The protagonist himself does not grow -- he's a superhero from the very beginning"

A two dimensional, cardboard cutout protagonist?

In a Final Fantasy game?

WHODA THUNK IT
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 3:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think they meant "grow more powerful"...

But yeah, there's probably no character development either.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 3:57PM Geist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's not an RPG at all. From what I saw at E3, this is just an action-adventure title, more akin to Zelda.

Also it looked like crap. Too many gameplay types mashed into one game, not enough focus on any of them.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 4:05PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I remember reading that this game does not have a level-up system in the strictest sense of the word, so perhaps that's what they meant. Perhaps power-up is entirely based on equipment.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 3:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's very annoying Square. You don't develop any of the mainline Final Fantasies for Nintendo consoles yet you're fine with letting all Nintendo has to become multiplatform. Before you start doing that you should start allowing the mainline series to come to the Wii.

And no one better start anything about core games not selling because a majority of them aren't quality games and the ones that are quality games are usually niche titles (Madworld, Zack and Wiki).
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 3:47PM CJLopez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Final Fantasy II is my second favorite FF (the first being VI). Really, that level up system gave you the ability to custom you characters (or at least, the first 4 ya started with).

I'd had loved for they to keep going that for further games, or a MMORPG that used this same system.

Man, really looking forward to this game.

PS: IX sucked IMO!!!! Blacksheep of the family, with X-2 close to it
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 4:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FF II was awesome precisely because of the leveling system.

Admittedly, the original NES version was kinda clunky, but the PS1/GBA/PSP remakes really smoothed things out. I'm shocked at how many reviewers complain that it [the remake] is too difficult or whine about having to grind to advance. I realize that RPG fans aren't the brightest bulbs around, but the treatment FF II has gotten has been embarrassing.

Hopefully we'll see something else use this system (and in a more organic way than the Elder Scrolls games did).
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 5:03PM vmenge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why did you think IX sucked?
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 6:17PM CJLopez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1.- They were already getting off the chibi appeareance of the character by 8 and bounced back (X is proof they didn't wanted to keep with this image anymore).
2.- Story wise, was boring
3.- They tried way to had to make it more funny and easy for kids
4.- Limit breaks was a big deal by then and I felt they was way to broken
5.- Main character was not of my likeness
6.- They were already on a pretty high tech + magic base and then bounced back to caves and castles
7.- The girl is the most annoying character i had seen in a while
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 10:39PM vmenge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1.- I don't see why it's 'bouncing back', they just changed style, it's a different game after all. And X sucked, it's the only FF I've played that I didn't like (just my opinion though)
2.- I thought the story was pretty good, maybe not the whole plot, but character interactions were the best I've seen so far in any FF game.
3.- I don't really agree, but ok.
4.- FFIX's limit break had one major flaw, but it wasn't that bad.
5.- :)
6.- I don't see why you keep saying bounced back. It's not like FFIX happened in the same world or timeframe as previous FFs.
7.- Eiko? Annoying yes, but not nearly as close as annoying as Tidus.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 4:08PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a direct contradiction to what they said previously (when the first new trailer emerged), they said that actual development was not underway at all when they unveiled the very first trailer 3 years ago, which is why it took so long to go anywhere
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 4:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I actually agree wtih Winterfang here...

Sorry but FF anything except the main series is just stupid in my opinion. No I don't care about the Crystal Bearers or the Chocobo's or any of that garbage.

Just give me Final Fantasy XIII and XIV (if it comes to the 360).
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 4:34PM xxxsam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm a lot more excited about this title since they made clear it was single-player. (Maybe that was known from the beginning and I just didn't notice - but whatever.) Certainly looks like a lot of effort went into it so hopefully it will turn out well!
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2009 3:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm a bit of a purist, so I've lost interest in the main Final Fantasy series due to their abandonment of the ATB and turn based combat, but I've been finding myself interested in this game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 4:56PM Tsubasa1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Final Fantasy, Numbers + CC are only good when they have crystal in them. I hated VII and felt mediocre about VIII. Still considered IX and IV best overall, and wish they would go back to the old style. I want Final Fantasy, not some Final Sci-Fi bs.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 6:30PM Railgun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know if any of the newer crystal chronicle games are better, but the one for GC at least I thought was awful.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 6:37PM 1059 WKYA Radio Mike Lightly said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FF:CC= the meaning of boredom

beautiful visuals. deam mans music. pathetic gameplay. biggest rpg'ish disappointment id had the displeasure of owning. it was so boring i couldn't play it any longer and simply gave up.

as far as FF, my I( go tjacked so i never played it, but squares terrible modern character designs has put me off too many times. got hopes for XIII, but im still offended by the afro/gayish/fancy//bird-in-hair/underpowered black character. As a character designer myself, i want to throw up just by looking at him.

Dont matter how good the game is- if the characters suck, I cant/wont play it. RPGamer fo' lyfez.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2009 9:40PM Hunter Rose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anyone who thought the original Crystal Chronicles sucks never played it on a GBA with three other people on GBAs working their hardest to work together. One of the best CO-OP gameplay experiences ever.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2009 1:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally I HATE turned based games. Strategy and RPG's.
Real time strategy and real time adventure/rpg is my style. For me, I think this is going to be one of the best games on Wii. :)

Most of my friends has the same oppinion. This game is just for another type of gamer. The usual Final Fantasy fan, should just ignore this title instead of whining about the gameplay and style, imo.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2009 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I do like these ideas but I think it is time to drop the Final Fantasy name from the series.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2009 5:05PM Kyogissun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just... can't help but remain unsure this will be good to those who actually enjoyed the original feel of the series.

He says it right there, they've chosen the new style and gameplay because it's popular...

Yes, because that's what the Final Fantasy series has ALWAYS been about, RIGHT?! Being POPULAR.

Man... I just... I'm going to give this game a try of course but...

I believe the celtic origins (You know, FEELING) of the original FF:CC are GONE FOREVER.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW