| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (47)

Posted: Jun 16th 2009 11:57PM imikedaman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
As soon as I saw this story on here and the associated picture, I just knew the place was going to be shady. Needy children don't need a brand new PS3 or Wii Fit. I think I'll stick to charity organizations that aren't ill-conceived and secretive.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 7:20AM HumanNature said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I agree. Children shouldn't be stuck indoors playing games. They need to be outside playing tag, catch, and whatever other kid sports. I'm sorry but flinging a wiimote does not count as exercise.

And these kids needs books not games.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:12PM Know said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Even charities you find reputable give away video games. Sure they could give away books also but just because a kid gets a video game doesn't mean he/she will never go outside again. If these kids are going to a youth center after school then they are most likely engaging in both learning and physical activity. I know when I was a kid I always put dodge ball before Street Fighter 2. The charity could provide more info on their background but the fact that they give away games doesn't make them shady.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 7:04PM mynk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i dont understand one thing though
there are lots and lots of people
who arent getting funding from governemnt or charities
who are not "needy" as one may put it
and go on their own income
and yet the only reason they dont get into gaming
is because its a very expensive hobby
and a normal middle class family
simply cant afford it on their income...

so something like this,
or any charity giving away video games
before giving away anything else
is like saying "these people in third world contries
never get to have a porche collection like jay leno
so we must give them money to build a car showroom in africa"

the only place such a charity would make sense
is if someone in make a wish foundation
made a wish to play video games
because they never got to.
Reply

Posted: Jun 16th 2009 11:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Man these kids need Hanna Montana!
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:00AM Burns11 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This charity is ridiculous, let's worry about the people who are starving or homeless before we worry about kids who can't play with an expensive toy.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:19AM BananaBoat said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The lack of empathy displayed here makes me a sad banana.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:54AM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You make Baby Hannah Montana cry.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 8:30AM MarioGreat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed.

Aside from the questionable merit of the organization, though, I'm also a little curious Joystiq gave a charity center a "Editor's Choice Award and a perfect 10/10 review". This is further made curious by the fact that it is admitted that Joystiq is a bit suspicious of the charity and can't be sure if it's legitimate.

So what, did Joystiq just gave the perfect 10/10 and Editor's Choice Award simply because it presented itself as a charity for children? Glad to know Joystiq gives its own review and award so much weight.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 9:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MarioSpitza - I think you need to read a little more carefully. They did not review this specific charity. The statement is that they reviewed "Being a Good Person" the name of the charity in question is Pixel Equity. Of course the joke ceases to be funny once it needs to be explained but being a good person would of course get favorable reviews.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:18PM MarioGreat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@CSunchanek

Uh, I know to charity is called 'Pixel Equity'; the fact that the website is 'www.pixelequity.com' and the initiative is called 'Pixel Equity: The Community Gaming Intiative' sort of pointed that out well enough. What I'm trying to point out is why did they give the organization credit when they themselves seem to question its legitimacy?

I'm sorry you had to explain the joke to me and it ceased to be funny for you. If I may propose, just don't explain it next time.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:01AM J43 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
L O L Hanna Montana
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:04AM CubeGuy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And you should also donate to the. . . ehhhh. . . "Cube Center For The Unloved Youth Who Need Games And Stuff And Also Gives Puppies And Kitties To The Terminally Ill Kids In Ethiopia Charity. . . Fund".

They're reputable. I checked.

. . .

*holds up picture of crying child in Africa*
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:09AM MrSpaceCowboy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'd rather provide a kid with a good education before I provide him with a gaming console.

Because it's the stupid ones that talk smack online.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 5:30AM Freddie Mercury said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it's ok, they're getting a wii
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 8:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
It's the 360 owners that talk smack online.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:10AM Yatcho said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I knew this loooked shady when they wanted me to donate to people called Roukieta, Oumar and Oswald.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Maybe we should donate to the Derek Zoolander Center For Kids Who Can't Read Good And Wanna Learn To Do Other Stuff Good Too instead....
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:31AM MystileArmor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
But how can we be expected to teach children to learn how to read if they can't even fit inside the building?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Mystile

I read your post and saw your avatar and couldn't help but laugh even harder. +1
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:41AM MystileArmor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Utter has got to be my favourite Simpsons character ever, even though he only appeared like twice, I think.

CHOCOLATE POODING!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i guess i could donate my video game manuals for reading material.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Treehouse of Horror IV
Lisa's Rival
Treehouse of Horror V
Lisa on Ice
The PTA Disbands
22 Short Films About Springfield
Much Apu About Nothing
Bart Star

Dont make me run, Im full of Chocolate
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:28AM MystileArmor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well played sir.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really need to see some classic Simpsons....
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:52AM MystileArmor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I need my XBL back online... btw did anyone notice the whole xbox.com site went down as well? I thought it was just going to be the marketplace.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:28AM MystileArmor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm to poor to drive a Bentley, does anyone want to start a charity for me? (A Ferrari, Lamborghini will do as well....)
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:31AM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I too am in need of a lambo... and a driver's license...
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This seems odd...
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 12:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
assuming they are getting an education, food, shelter, etc.

for entertainment, i think i would rather donate something like a musical instrument.

or i guess wii music... if i had that game *whistles innocently*
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:40AM MrSpaceCowboy said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'll give you an empty bottle. Then you can make music with it!
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 7:25AM HumanNature said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's sad, kids these days don't need to suffer necessity.

Man, when I was a kid, I didn't have a gaming console since my parents wouldn't get me one. Instead, I've end up trying all sorts of crazy experiments in the name of science. I've also build all sorts of things with whatever I had lying around.

Now, I look at my little cousin. He expects everything spoon fed and doesn't even have the patience to learn a game. He expects to be taught. It's just sad.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 11:59AM cbarrentos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MrSpaceCowboy: never EVER stop in the middle of a hoedown!
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:47AM Reaper man said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I tried the game Being a Nice person, and it wasn't nearly as fun as Being an Asshole.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:59AM Sly C said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Being An Asshole is a really fun game until you get to the sequel "Getting Your Ass Kicked"
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 7:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But the sequel is contingent on you playing a "Pussy" class character the whole game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 9:22AM mrmobius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At the end of the day, these 'make decisions to affect your game' type games only ever end up with the decisions making a superficial difference to the story anyway.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 3:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If anyone really wants to donate to a legitimate, gaming-related Charity, Child's Play is a great choice. They raise money for buying video games and consoles like Pixel Equity, but send them to children's hospitals. It's either run by or closely affiliated with the good folks at Penny Arcade.

http://www.childsplaycharity.org/
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 3:34AM pibs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That seems more appropriate.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 2:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mike Krahulik and Jerry Holkins run it. They're the PA guys.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 9:41AM adamhalliwell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Man, you guys are jaded. When I was younger, we bought an Atari (though we had virtually no money growing up), and it sparked an interest for me that's lasted a lifetime. There's plenty of time as a kid to play video games and play outside... I know I did! Yes, people need food, but I bet you're not even donating to any of those charities.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 11:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's interesting to note that the picture accompanying this article doesn't show any Microsoft or Sony product. Is that a tacit admission from Joystiq editors that "hardcore" gamers are selfish, greedy, uncharitable folks? ;-)

--R.J.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 11:10AM zochmenos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The founder of this "charity" is Matthew Badalucco, forming employee of Lehman Brothers.

I guess if you've already done the "not for profit" thing once...
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 11:13AM zochmenos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Charity is local. Give a friend some money. Give a local family a bag of groceries.

This is capitalism. And even if it is legit, your and my inability to know that makes donating foolish.

Kids who are "needy" don't need to be taught but a college grad to covet luxuries.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 11:18AM ducttapeBigSexy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Joystiq, if you've got a feeling a charity is actually a scam, don't give them feel publicity.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2009 1:07PM Deuce said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I could not, in good conscience, give money to anyone with those names listed in the image.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW